Armature? http://armature.com/ They are in the same city and did the MGS HD port for Vita….That is what I want to know too. The remake was so heavily rumoured it seemed a certain. But if not bluepoint then who?
Sony always bought studios who previously did work on exclusives for them, in all the generations. They won't scale down 2nd and 3rd party exclusives side, the opposite: they are also pushing harder there too.All these Sony acquisitions, and Hulst saying they are not done, sound to me like a preemptive defensive move. Sony has always worked closely with 3rd party studios but only now are they acquiring them.
It isn't a defensive move, PS always did this of acquiring people who successfully worked for them for a long period.With MS buying Bethesda and rumored to be buying another publisher or two it must have sent Sony in an aggressive move. That's smart on Sony's part and Vinciquerra's word on the gaming industry consolidating is foreshadowing on what's happening now.
Awesome!"Our next project, we're working on original content right now. We can't talk about what that is, but that's the next step in the evolution for us"
Ps1 of course, was the game that made me get a ps1, look so awesome back thenPs1 or Ps3?
If you mean Ps1, sir, I salute you. If one game needs a remake it's that (...And Dropship from the Ps2)
So remade :d something like re2 2019 or ffe7rMGS remake please and an actual remake. No more 1:1 stuff. I love DS and SOTC, but they need to bring new ideas to these remakes.
Not exactly sure how credible she is, but I wouldn't be surprised if this were the case.
late to the party on this but, wow, awesome, what an absolute quality studio to pick up, I cant wait to see what they are working on.![]()
I might be in the minority, but I'd like to see them make their own game and not remake a classic.
Ah, Metal Gear Solid 6!Their next game is original content
I would cry legit tears if this happened. This game means so much to meLegend of the dragoon remake when?
When did they "NOT" acquire studios though?
Sony always bought studios who previously did work on exclusives for them, in all the generations. They won't scale down 2nd and 3rd party exclusives side, the opposite: they are also pushing harder there too.
It isn't a defensive move, PS always did this of acquiring people who successfully worked for them for a long period.
And MS even with Bethesda is still way behind Sony, Sony's game division continues making way more revenue (and profit) than the MS one. Zenimax game sales were less than 3% (probably 2%) of PS4 game sales, which are growing.
So Sony won't miss Zenimax and is making way more money than MS, so no defensive moves are needed.
Oh this would be great. I'm really craving a new Jak game but a remake with Ratchet level graphics would fit nicelyJak and Daxter trilogy remake or fuck off
They created Blast Factor for PlayStation 3, which was one of the First downloadable games that was available for that system at its launch.So, Hulst and Ryan still wants to talk that they are not in arms race and they prefer organic growth?
Because if answer is yes I just need to know to believe exact opposite of what they are talking in future...
But congratz to the team. I'm interested what they will do when not making remakes...
OMG I'm dying. Sony scooping up Studios left and right!PARTY ROCKERS IN THE HOUSE TONIGHT
![]()
Sony makes way more revenue than MS with their gaming division, selling consoles, selling games for them, selling 1st party games and selling game subscription services for them. Sony also releases way more exclusives (including 1st, 2nd and 3rd party) for them and their exclusives win a lot of more GOTY awards than the MS ones.I disagree. I think it's a defensive move, or better yet a proactive move, as MS is rumored to be making moves and both Nadella and Spencer have hinted at such. I think MS would buy another publisher or two. Sony's own Vinciquerra has mentioned consolidation is happening in the game space.
Not exactly sure how credible she is, but I wouldn't be surprised if this were the case.
Ore he has a few of the same shirts, bought by his wifeNever saw this coming, I'm shook
In other news... isn't that the shirt Herman was wearing in a past PS5 showcase?!?! Was that filmed months and months ago![]()
The new Steve Jobs of video games... just always rockin that grey button up, his new signature look.Ore he has a few of the same shirts, bought by his wife![]()
Next on the bucket list
Kojima Productions
Ember Labs
Arc System Works
Kadokawa
Low PS5 userbase. Demon Souls will get more salesNot trying to be an ass, I love Sony and Demon's Souls, not starting a war ...
But isn't 1.4 mil over a year a little low when games like MK11 sell like 2mil in the first week or something?
Not trying to be an ass, I love Sony and Demon's Souls, not starting a war ...
But isn't 1.4 mil over a year a little low when games like MK11 sell like 2mil in the first week or something?
I know everyone here is sick of console warring, but these acquistions wouldn't have happened if MS didnt buy Bethesda. After spending an entire generation closing down 4 studios, and buying just one new studio in Insomniac, Sony has bought 4 studios (housemarque, Nixxes, Firesprite and BP) in a matter of months.
Competition is good. I'd argue that MS doesn't go out and acquire Playground Games, Ninja Theory and Obsidian if Sony first party wasnt so goddamn successful last gen. They were pretty much forced to respond, and I feel Sony was forced to act as well.
We don't need all the big companies buying up all the smaller studios, but there is no denying that healthy competition between two industry giants is good for the gaming industry as whole. Studios like BP, Housemarque, Ninja Theory and Obsidian struggle to get big money from third party devs and thats exactly where first party support is needed.
Keep the pressure up on your favorite company. Dont let them get complacent and good things will follow. Taking pot shots at their competition is fun, but criticism of your favorite company can be quite productive.
But you do know the options for 3rd party at that time were limited.
In the PS1 era, they had Sega Saturn (a dead platform) and N64 (with its high costs thanks to cartridge). It was easy to jump on Sony wagon, even more when they were the only who really cared about 3rd party.
In the PS2 era, Sony continued to be the best option for partnership but this didn't stop MS and Nintendo to get some nice deals with 3rd party. That's what competition really means.
So, no. It is not the same thing.
MS started a trend where they are locking devs and publishers to their ecosystem. Sony never did that before,
but they'll have to now cause they can lose some important partners if not.
Sony always bought studios who previously did work on exclusives for them, in all the generations. They won't scale down 2nd and 3rd party exclusives side, the opposite: they are also pushing harder there too.
It isn't a defensive move, PS always did this of acquiring people who successfully worked for them for a long period.
And MS even with Bethesda is still way behind Sony, Sony's game division continues making way more revenue (and profit) than the MS one. Zenimax game sales were less than 3% (probably 2%) of PS4 game sales, which are growing.
So Sony won't miss Zenimax and is making way more money than MS, so no defensive moves are needed.
Interesting... She knew about the Wolverine reveal before it was officially announced.
Sony makes way more revenue than MS with their gaming division, selling consoles, selling games for them, selling 1st party games and selling game subscription services for them. Sony also releases way more exclusives (including 1st, 2nd and 3rd party) for them and their exclusives win a lot of more GOTY awards than the MS ones.
Sony has zero reasons to make a defensive move against a direct competition they are dominating in all areas. And if they would want to make a defensive move they'd buy some big publishers because they have cash to make it. Instead of spending $10B as MS did in the recent years, they could go and spend $30B only with cash they have available and that has been mostly generated by their gaming division, the one who made $25B in revenue this fiscal year.
They bought a small studio that makes PC port, another small one that makes remakes, a mid sized one that made their first AAA game after several small games and a couple of studios who made some VR games but has a lot of staff who previously did work for them. These studios don't have any interesting IP.
These acquisitions that Sony made are nothing compared to the acquisition of Zenimax, they are in a very different scale. They are only a consolidation of the relationship they had with people who did work for them and to secure they'll work in some strategic areas helping to milk better the IPs Sony already has with some PC ports of old games, some remakes, some VR games and maybe some extra AAA sequel or some AAA new IP.
Zenimax instead was a big publisher with a lot of top AAA IPs and top AAA studios because MS needed them because they were way behind Sony in term of active top AAA IPs and top AAA studios. Sony doesn't need to acquire a lot of IPs or big studios.
Sony owns the rights to Cowboy Bebop?Arc systems and Ember labs. But Ember labs also does video/animation for commercials. SO unless they agree to be a game only studio I don't know if that will happen? Arc systems to me is a no brainer. Specifically for the Japanese crowd where Blaze Blue, gran blue sell the most.
Imagine Arc Sytems making a action game in that style but for a license like Cowboy bebop which now Sony owns rights too.