ArgyleReptile
Banned
I feel the last statement of the first post sums up my feelings on this.
That's not true. Critics are fans too.
LolYou make it sound like it's Robocop 3..
PayPal?
Dude!Robocop is garbage
I just came back with my brother. We both thought the movie was trash. I wasn't a fan of Man of Steel but Man of Steel is way better than this.
This is not a movie. This is a complete mess. I legitimately feel sorry for the DC fanboys defending this saying it is a good movie. They deserve better but since this is all they have they have to defend it.
What was BvS about? The entire film is premised on the need for two super heroes to fight. There's this thing I refer to as "plot scaffolding". Some movies have a story to tell, and as that story is told things happen and characters conflict and from those conflicts things like action scenes result. (A simple example would be the Thor/Iron Man fight in Avengers. Fan service, but fan service that built out of the story.) BvS works backward: it's premised on a fight, and the entire point of the film is there's a fight between them in the 3rd act. But the movie doesn't know how to get there, so it erects plot scaffolding for the director to scrabble up to reach that point. But the scaffolding is on full display, it's badly built and it's creaky as hell.
Pimp as fuck!!I liked how Robocop 2 had a 12 year old kid as a drug kingpin.
I liked how Robocop 2 had a 12 year old kid as a drug kingpin.
Pimp as fuck!!The entire ordeal was so confusing as a kid lol. Like, damn! I know some shitty kids, and this little fucker was on another level. I'd still call it an odd(?) scared straight moment..
You said it much better than I could have, exactly. And they did it all in a way that flowed directly out of the story, and served an important role in its development - it wasn't the point of the story.The Thor vs Iron Man fight was also necessary not just for the story but for the way it sets up the characters and their capabilities. It showed that Iron Man is the jockular one who sets up his own rules, that Thor is the boisterously serious yet naive one and that Cap is the one who keeps the team glued together. Also shown in terms of what the characters can do - Thor is physically stronger than Iron Man, yet the latter can still put up a fight with his gadgets. Cap's shield is powerful enough to deflect even Thor's hammer. All that stuff comes to play in the final fight in some way.
It's one of the most perfect ways that they staged a cool sequence that's great on the fan service while also being important to the movie and also important to newcomers who might not even have watched any of the previous movies (and funnily enough the joke about Thor inadvertently powering up Iron Man's armor becomes an actual Chekhov's Ability in Age of Ultron).
Can't stand him..if that was the mission, shit was accomplished.They only did it cause the Studio wanted to up the shocking violence with something else for the sequel to make controversy.
Didn't work and I hate that kid.
Agreed, I am shocked at the vehemence with which some people are defending this movie.
I can't think of any good reason for it other than to display loyalty to a comic book company.
Agreed, I am shocked at the vehemence with which some people are defending this movie.
I can't think of any good reason for it other than to display loyalty to a comic book company. I know the fans wanted it to be good, but come on guys. This isn't the movie.
Agreed, I am shocked at the vehemence with which some people are defending this movie.
I can't think of any good reason for it other than to display loyalty to a comic book company. I know the fans wanted it to be good, but come on guys. This isn't the movie.
Warner Bros.'s best move would be to scrap everything and start over. Drop the grimdark, drop the grey filter, cast a better Superman and Lex Luthor, get Snyder and Goyer way the fuck away and don't do crossovers until you've actually established the characters first.
Wonder Woman's battle intro was dope, so much so that I'm actually looking forward to her standalone now. She kicks ass.To me it's on the same level as Man of Steel. What makes it disappointing though is that they learned jack from Man of Steel.
Tacos. We're you a fan of MoS? Was Supes better in this than MoS?
Maybe thor but who the heck doesn't know who iron man isPeople have got to stop comparing IronMan and Thor to Supes and Batman
Pre 2008 or even now If i asked my parents who Iron man or Thor were they would have no clue, but ask them about Bats and Supes and they would know.
So when marvel churns out bad-mediocre thor or ironman films no one cares, but my grandparents know who batman and superman are, so when you mangle them this badly of course critics are going to sound off. There is no conspiracy here.
People have got to stop comparing IronMan and Thor to Supes and Batman
Pre 2008 or even now If i asked my parents who Iron man or Thor were they would have no clue, but ask them about Bats and Supes and they would know.
So when marvel churns out bad-mediocre thor or ironman films no one cares, but my grandparents know who batman and superman are so when you mangle them this badly of course critics are going to sound off. There is no conspiracy here.
...and when you saw it and dont like it, you let yourself fool into hating it.What bothers me is the people who come in here with "fuck the critics, they're wrong! It was great and you should all see it!" ...and that's it. Nothing of substance to add to the conversation and no understanding whatsoever of the function of critics. I don't doubt that most if not all of the people behind those posts genuinely enjoyed the film, but the posts themselves are obnoxious.
Yeah, it's Robocop 2. Robocop 2 was great. It's no Robocop 1, but it still succeeds in its own right.
I'm gonna assume you're referring to the reboot? If not, it's a good thing I'm already sitting down.
Dude!
Are you referring to me, since I bought it up? I was using it as an example of conflict out of story, rather than a conflict used to build a story around, nothing more.People have got to stop comparing IronMan and Thor to Supes and Batman.
“We talked about the usual suspects that you would imagine; any actor who has been bald, probably,” Synder says. “Bryan Cranston would have been great, right? And by the way, he’s an amazing actor. Can you imagine how different the movie would be?”
Eisenberg has no idea how he fits into the pantheon of other Lex Luthors. “I’m so unfamiliar with anything surrounding it because I didn’t grow up reading the comics or watching these movies,” he said. “I read a little bit out of interest, but it was meaningless.”
Tacos. We're you a fan of MoS? Was Supes better in this than MoS?
Eisenberg has no idea how he fits into the pantheon of other Lex Luthors. Im so unfamiliar with anything surrounding it because I didnt grow up reading the comics or watching these movies, he said. I read a little bit out of interest, but it was meaningless.
Found it!
![]()
we dont have room for Jimmy Olsen in our big pantheon of characters, but we can have fun with him, right?
I have read almost this entire thread and have seen very few comments that reeked of overt fanboyism. Some DC fans like it a lot, and that's okay. Some hated it. A dude with a BvS avatar just burned it down a couple pages ago.
What bothers me is the people who come in here with "fuck the critics, they're wrong! It was great and you should all see it!" ...and that's it. Nothing of substance to add to the conversation and no understanding whatsoever of the function of critics. I don't doubt that most if not all of the people behind those posts genuinely enjoyed the film, but the posts themselves are obnoxious.
I remember seeing a 90+% popcorn bucket. Someone earlier in the thread, I believe it was Bobby Roberts, noted the drop in one of their posts. I would look it up but my phone is almost dead and I've got an assignment to finish.That was the % of people who wanted to see the movie.
I think I made this.Found it!
![]()
I already said this before, but she really looks like Gillian Jacobs when playing Harley.
![]()
I enjoyed the vision they were going for in MoS. As for whether I like him better in MoS or BvS, I cant say because truth be told I barely remember his involvement in the film besides the ending. He was there, but for the most part the scenes he was in just felt like they had more emphasis on the people he was with and how they saw him.Tacos. We're you a fan of MoS? Was Supes better in this than MoS?
Damn. I think the more I ask, the more I need to stop. So, you're saying MoS version fits with this movie AND you like him more here?Wasn't a fan of Man of Steel, but the Superman they went with for that film works in BvS. I enjoyed Superman a lot more in BvS.
So, it was a Batman film?I enjoyed the vision they were going for in MoS. As for whether I like him better in MoS or BvS, I cant say because truth be told I barely remember his involvement in the film besides the ending. He was there, but for the most part the scenes he was in just felt like they had more emphasis on the people he was with and how they saw him.
Oh wow. This explains so much.
Eisenberg has no idea how he fits into the pantheon of other Lex Luthors. Im so unfamiliar with anything surrounding it because I didnt grow up reading the comics or watching these movies, he said. I read a little bit out of interest, but it was meaningless.
This was the exact kind of cold indifference Snyder says he wanted. He cant fake it, he says.
Snyder seems so obsessed with going against the grain, or doing the opposite of what people might expect, even desire, from his movies. It seems like every time I see him quoted he references someone telling him "you can't do that," even hypothetically.
No. Nooooooooo. Naaaaah. Can't agree.No Robocop as a franchise is garbage
I don't see this as a positive.