ThoseDeafMutes
Member
There is only one BAD MCU movie.
Iron Man 2
You forgot Thor 2, but don't worry, everyone else did too.
There is only one BAD MCU movie.
Iron Man 2
Yeah, you dont cut 30 minutes out of a final cut and not lose anything.
Would be very surprised if the Extended Cut isn't a huge improvement in terms of pacing, structure and characterization...all of which seem to be big criticisms at the moment.
There is only one BAD MCU movie.
Iron Man 2
What if it breaks down into three minutes of plot-related scenes and twenty-seven minutes of Batman brutalizing criminals and Superman in ways that couldn't make the PG-13 standard?I have a weird feeling the extra 30 minutes in the Ultimate cut weren't really optional. Like Watchmen.
It can't be bad because it's not trying to not be a superhero movie.
There is only one BAD MCU movie.
Iron Man 2
You forgot Thor 2, but don't worry, everyone else did too.
lol wut
The movie completely misses a lot of the novel's themes
When I talk about faithfulness, I'm talking about how it's virtually the same basic framework with much of the same imagery, including shot for shot recreations of panels.And he also showed the world he had no idea what the fuck Watchmen was actually about.
I have a really hard time believing that. Even Snyder isn't that indulgent towards thoughtless action. People say the pacing in the first half of this movie is crazy.. just like Man of Steel was for me. There's probably stuff gutted left and right.What if it breaks down into three minutes of plot-related scenes and twenty-seven minutes of Batman brutalizing criminals and Superman in ways that didn't make the PG-13 cut?
IIRC he said there wasn't much cut. More than likely Man of Steel was much more rushed than this was or any of Snyder's other movies.I'm really wondering why Man of Steel never got a Director's Cut. Snyder likes doing them, did WB just disagree with having one, or was he too busy jumping right into the sequel and DCCU planning at the time?
And now the thread is going in circles.
Age of Ultron is awesome.
I'VE GOT THESE 24 INCH PYTHONS FOR YOU HERE BATMAN
HOW ARE YOU GONNA DEAL WITH THE MAN OF STEEL
ARE YOU READY TO GET IT ON WITH THE LAST SON OF KRYPTON
Neither are bad movies. Whedon's stuff is too quippy and Age of Ultron suffered from having to set up the next phase, but it's not abysmal.
BvS was announced 2 weeks after MoS' premiere, and that movie was made on a rush by WB amidst some threats of losing the rights to the character. A good director's cut is possible, but it should actually shorten the movie.I'm really wondering why Man of Steel never got a Director's Cut. Snyder likes doing them, did WB just disagree with having one, or was he too busy jumping right into the sequel and DCCU planning at the time?
Thor 1 and 2 aren't good either.
When I talk about faithfulness, I'm talking about how it's virtually the same basic framework with much of the same imagery, including shot for shot recreations of panels.
I don't like Zack Snyder's Watchmen, but there's no denying only a Watchmen fan could have made that movie.
"You're a psychopath"If I wanted it, you'd be fit already
lol wut
The movie completely misses a lot of the novel's themes
It's kinda tough to write around TDKR + shoe horn in like 5 superheroes, too. There's only so much you can do with 2.5 hours.He needs better writers at least.
The squid was horrible and I almost stopped reading after that panel. I don't even care how much sense it might have made.The ending isn't a facsimile of the book, but it's a faithful representation of it, as there's no way they were going to do the squid.
He's on record saying WB actually was READY to make it a 3 hours movie, but he pressured HARD to shorten it as much as possible. That's what I'm salty against him, this is his fault.In this case, it really seems like a Watchman case again maybe. Big ass fucking movie, but WB aint about to release a 3 hour movie.
So, Iron Man 3 doesn't exist, right?
Wait, what? Are you saying that BvS is not trying to be a superhero movie? It seems to me like if there were EVER a movie trying to be a superhero movie, it's this.
Just got out of this.
It's awful and I went in with really low expectations after Man of Steel.
There's zero character development and everything seems jumbled, like scenes are mixed up. Its bonkers.
I would wager a week long ban from GAF if Civil War dips below BvS on RT.
There is only one BAD MCU movie.
Iron Man 2
Wait so Batman is pulling some Punisher level shit in this movie? Because lol if so
Iron 3 and Thor franchise. Iron Man 1 is vastly overratted as well.There is only one BAD MCU movie.
Iron Man 2
How did he fuck this up?
So, Iron Man 3 doesn't exist, right?
lol wut
The movie completely misses a lot of the novel's themes
SPOILERS FOR THE MOVIE:
He kills so many fucking people its almost laughable.
SPOILERS FOR THE MOVIE:
He kills so many fucking people its almost laughable.
So, Iron Man 3 doesn't exist, right?
He's a bro, breh. He just doesn't get it.
Snyder is a surface read sort of guy.
He had Nite Owl and Silk Spectre casually killing dudes.
However, I think that the film was hurt by the fact that Silk Spectre is the emotional lychpin of the entire comic series, and Malin Akerman can't act.
memento69 lost me at "... the cinematic masterpiece 2001 called Shallow Hal."
SPOILERS FOR THE MOVIE:
He kills so many fucking people its almost laughable.
Lol. Can't wait as I thought Mos was poop.Just got out of this.
It's awful and I went in with really low expectations after Man of Steel.
There's zero character development and everything seems jumbled, like scenes are mixed up. Its bonkers.
So is Snyder going to continue to make all these movies? MoS & BvS aren't critical darlings by any stretch. And if he does get replaced, when? And by who?
SPOILERS FOR THE MOVIE:
He kills so many fucking people its almost laughable.
So is Snyder going to continue to make all these movies? MoS & BvS aren't critical darlings by any stretch. And if he does get replaced, when? And by who?