• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Captain America: Brave New World | Official Trailer

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
Interesting that of the 6-7 articles, that was the ONLY one that said there was just one session of reshoots, yet THAT'S the article you take as gospel. Alllll the others, across YEARS, say there have been numerous reshoots. I put it in there to show that there is some confusion about this film's production, and no one, even the most positive, says its been a smooth ride. And what even counts as a reshoot these days? Most of the fight scenes are probably 95% cg, so "reshooting" those takes place in a server farm somewhere, not on the streets of Atlanta or a sound stage. The point isn't to quibble about how many re-shoots there were, but that the film was hacked and mangled beyond recognition, was helmed by a director waaaaaaaaaay out of his depth, was flawed at conception, and has been 'committee managed' into a pulp.

You clearly have some insider access, or just wait tables where marvel execs hang out and vent. But I don't think you necessarily put out 100% factual info and I don't think that this film ONLY had 22 days of reshoots nor that it ONLY cost 180 mill to make. It reeks of YEARS of tinkering, reshooting, cost over-runs, and editing nightmares.

I believe he zeroed in on that one because it's basically the only trade publication (meaning they have direct connections to studios, actors, crew, etc) than the others which are basically rumor blogs. Except for The Direct which is more a cross between trade and rumor site.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
A Hollywood Trade is a legitimate news source. Fanboy websites relying on Adsense clicks is not.
Fair enough. Not to keep beating this dead horse (too late) but the THR article was from May 24 and seeming refers to a spring/early summer 22 days reshoot, while Esposito mentions a FALL 24 series of reshoots as well.


And given that his ENTIRE CHARACTER was added after principal photography was done and then the script rewritten, stands to reason these aren't just the usual "oh, it's not super clear that you picked up the gun, lets go back and get a closer shot of it" type stuff.

Anyway, as this film is trending lower in the reviews, it's obvious that whatever was done to this film isn't resonating with critics. Seems to me that we are seeing the creaks and leaks in the "Marvel System" of filmmaking. Maybe they can get in some directors that can do proper storyboarding and have finalized scripts to limit overruns and changes, or at least keep the "we are just keeping all these balls in the air" feel of a lot of the 'tween tentpole films that spend more time doing grand narrative service than dealing with the titular hero of the film.
 

ManaByte

Member
And given that his ENTIRE CHARACTER was added after principal photography was done and then the script rewritten, stands to reason these aren't just the usual "oh, it's not super clear that you picked up the gun, lets go back and get a closer shot of it" type stuff.
He replaced Seth Rollins. It wasn’t an entire character. Seth Rollins was originally the leader of the Serpent Society in the movie. Esposito replaced him. He’s in 3 scenes.

And Collider isn’t a Hollywood trade either. It’s a fan site as well and it’s owner is banned from ever interviewing Mackey due to past clickbait videos he made about hm.
 
Last edited:

ManaByte

Member
Director of the movie confirms what The Hollywood Reporter said, only one period of reshoots for the Serpent Society stuff. The other clickbait sites were full of shit as usual and the Internet decided to believe bullshit.

 
Last edited:

Trogdor1123

Member
I hope it turns out good but I have zero desire to see it. None. Maybe when it comes to Disney plus but I don’t know. Anthony Mackie is pretty great though, I’d like him to stay in more stuff but not as Batman, I mean captain America
 

Jinxed

Member
He leads the Avengers in Doomsday and Secret Wars. Deal with it.
We dont have to deal with it, Disney will

Nick Offerman Laughing GIF
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
Man, that was a dogshit movie. It earned all the scorn it is getting. While the base plot was serviceable I guess, its was trash level writing, nonexistent character development, muddy effects, bizarre and ugly cinematography, and incredibly cheap feeling sets that just underscored the shredded plot that left no room for proper scene transitions, exposition of all the crap from a tv show or previous film that I haven't watched, or any sense of the stakes or threats. As a "spy thriller" it was cartoony bad with keyboard banging as the only way to find the next macguffin.

You can DEFINITELY see the reshoots, that whole opening scene has a level of clarity and precision absent the rest of the film, then the rest of Espositio's stuff, and he was only in the film for 6.5 minutes, I measured, was simple dialogue scenes. Where that 22 days of shooting (+ the reshoots he said he did later) were for...who can say?). I'm starting the believe that 180 mill budget number though, at least for the initial photography, because the CG was worse than Black Panther.

I'll spoiler my thoughts on the plot in case anyone actually wants to see this thing "untainted" :p

So I'll start with The Leader. VERY unimposing as the mastermind with silly make-up (however translated from the comics it may be). But he somehow figured out an audio/visual command system and then knew the EXACT folks to prep for it and how to deliver these commands with such precision that they were able to pull off extensive coordinated acts? Shit, if he had that level of exquisite control then how did he have all these redundancy folks scattered around? If his inital plan was to assassinate the Pres in the brief, yet he somehow had a couple of Hornet pilots on stand-by? But thats typical "evil genius mastermind" bad writing so I'll let that one go.

Poor Sabra. Turned from an Israeli superhero to ANOTHER ex-Widow, and really, a former Russian/Soviet assassin is the Director of Security for the US? WTF???? But even if she was still Israeli, what was her role there, at all?

Falcon junior seemed just as capable as Sam, minus the magic wakandan tech. It was choice irony that they refused to call HIM "Falcon", even though he was wearing the uniform and doing the job, while Sam is called "Captain America" for....wearing the uniform and doing the job. WTF are these superhero titles then?

As for Sam, he is now an Iron Man/Black Panther/Captain America mash-up. He has the magic nano-tech of Iron man with effortless control of complex technomagical systems yet the infinite impact absorbing power of the Panther AND the precise shield control of the Cap. Why the shield though? Seemed like his knife throwing wings are superior in every way. Oh yeah, because the Shield is like Excalibur, if you possess it you get the title, I guess.

The treaty thing, WTF? The Indian Ocean is THOUSANDS of miles from Japan, why are they even in the discussion? Both India AND Indonesia, right there, have Navies MUCH larger. Picking Japan seemed like a bizarre choice, in a film FILLED with them. I'm guessing the writers wanted China but Disney said "pick another asian country, one that might generate BO for us". Color me disappointed that they didn't have an adamantium veritech fighter. Opportunity missed!

The whole Isaiha Bradley thing was ham-fisted. So he got the super soldier serum first? So what? We've established that serum IS NOT what makes you Captain America. And is he 110 years old like Bucky? I'm guessing he had story in F&WS but it was very poorly explained here other than he was Sam's very strong but cranky uncle or something. I'll just give that one the benefit of the doubt that it makes sense in the context of the whole D+ show but it's distracting in this film.

So the pres steps down. Who even was the vice-president? Mrs. VEEP herself Julia Dreyfus? Whoever it is, they were so unimportant they don't even get MENTIONED in the film, much less a set-up scene. I did like that Bucky looks a LOT like JD Vance, setting him up as a congressman positions him to be POTUS in the future and that semblance will come in handy I suspect :p

Anyway, enough for now. My kid was very uninterested in the film and confused by it. But he likes Bucky so we are seeing Thunderbolts! Yay(?) That the trailers for that film give ZERO idea what the F the plot is or even much about the villain makes me fear it's gonna be yet another chopped up disjointed mess of scenes, but we'll see.
 
Would have been better if they left the Hulk character off the trailer, posters, etc... for it to be a complete surprise
Trailer editors/marketing departments have zero tact, they just follow scripted formulas of how to create marketing materials by putting everything exciting in there, regardless if it is a spoiler or not, because it increases attendance/profit by a few percentage; heck some trailers are every important beat in the movie from start to finish, trailers for animated movies are notorious for this bullshit.
Famously not that long ago the director for terminator genisys was upset with the marketing because it spoiled the entire twist, heck I believe they spoiled terminator 2 back in the day as well.
Unless some studio exec steps in, or the studio allows the director to edit the trailer themselves, every trailer is basically just formulaic spoiler reel.

I stopped watching trailers ~20 years ago and everything has been better for it, though I still managed to get spoiled for terminator genisys at the last second because there was a full on spoiler poster of it right before the theater room....
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Trailer editors/marketing departments have zero tact, they just follow scripted formulas of how to create marketing materials by putting everything exciting in there, regardless if it is a spoiler or not, because it increases attendance/profit by a few percentage; heck some trailers are every important beat in the movie from start to finish, trailers for animated movies are notorious for this bullshit.
Famously not that long ago the director for terminator genisys was upset with the marketing because it spoiled the entire twist, heck I believe they spoiled terminator 2 back in the day as well.
Unless some studio exec steps in, or the studio allows the director to edit the trailer themselves, every trailer is basically just formulaic spoiler reel.

I stopped watching trailers ~20 years ago and everything has been better for it, though I still managed to get spoiled for terminator genisys at the last second because there was a full on spoiler poster of it right before the theater room....
For me, trailers are trash. Not du to spoiling plots because by the time I watch the movie I probably forgot all the explosions already.

But everyone knows, a trailer is all cool music and edited scenes which the final movie is likely not representative of. If they were, the whole movie would be awesome balls to the wall action.

I remember Matrix movies hyping up those dumb looking albino twins like they are huge enemies. They were barely in the movie.
 

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
Just saw it ... Ended about 3:50.


I REALLY enjoyed it! It went by fast. Didn't have one boring scene. I don't know what you lot are smoking but I had a BLAST!
 

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
Man, that was a dogshit movie. It earned all the scorn it is getting. While the base plot was serviceable I guess, its was trash level writing, nonexistent character development, muddy effects, bizarre and ugly cinematography, and incredibly cheap feeling sets that just underscored the shredded plot that left no room for proper scene transitions, exposition of all the crap from a tv show or previous film that I haven't watched, or any sense of the stakes or threats. As a "spy thriller" it was cartoony bad with keyboard banging as the only way to find the next macguffin.

You can DEFINITELY see the reshoots, that whole opening scene has a level of clarity and precision absent the rest of the film, then the rest of Espositio's stuff, and he was only in the film for 6.5 minutes, I measured, was simple dialogue scenes. Where that 22 days of shooting (+ the reshoots he said he did later) were for...who can say?). I'm starting the believe that 180 mill budget number though, at least for the initial photography, because the CG was worse than Black Panther.

I'll spoiler my thoughts on the plot in case anyone actually wants to see this thing "untainted" :p

So I'll start with The Leader. VERY unimposing as the mastermind with silly make-up (however translated from the comics it may be). But he somehow figured out an audio/visual command system and then knew the EXACT folks to prep for it and how to deliver these commands with such precision that they were able to pull off extensive coordinated acts? Shit, if he had that level of exquisite control then how did he have all these redundancy folks scattered around? If his inital plan was to assassinate the Pres in the brief, yet he somehow had a couple of Hornet pilots on stand-by? But thats typical "evil genius mastermind" bad writing so I'll let that one go.

Poor Sabra. Turned from an Israeli superhero to ANOTHER ex-Widow, and really, a former Russian/Soviet assassin is the Director of Security for the US? WTF???? But even if she was still Israeli, what was her role there, at all?

Falcon junior seemed just as capable as Sam, minus the magic wakandan tech. It was choice irony that they refused to call HIM "Falcon", even though he was wearing the uniform and doing the job, while Sam is called "Captain America" for....wearing the uniform and doing the job. WTF are these superhero titles then?

As for Sam, he is now an Iron Man/Black Panther/Captain America mash-up. He has the magic nano-tech of Iron man with effortless control of complex technomagical systems yet the infinite impact absorbing power of the Panther AND the precise shield control of the Cap. Why the shield though? Seemed like his knife throwing wings are superior in every way. Oh yeah, because the Shield is like Excalibur, if you possess it you get the title, I guess.

The treaty thing, WTF? The Indian Ocean is THOUSANDS of miles from Japan, why are they even in the discussion? Both India AND Indonesia, right there, have Navies MUCH larger. Picking Japan seemed like a bizarre choice, in a film FILLED with them. I'm guessing the writers wanted China but Disney said "pick another asian country, one that might generate BO for us". Color me disappointed that they didn't have an adamantium veritech fighter. Opportunity missed!

The whole Isaiha Bradley thing was ham-fisted. So he got the super soldier serum first? So what? We've established that serum IS NOT what makes you Captain America. And is he 110 years old like Bucky? I'm guessing he had story in F&WS but it was very poorly explained here other than he was Sam's very strong but cranky uncle or something. I'll just give that one the benefit of the doubt that it makes sense in the context of the whole D+ show but it's distracting in this film.

So the pres steps down. Who even was the vice-president? Mrs. VEEP herself Julia Dreyfus? Whoever it is, they were so unimportant they don't even get MENTIONED in the film, much less a set-up scene. I did like that Bucky looks a LOT like JD Vance, setting him up as a congressman positions him to be POTUS in the future and that semblance will come in handy I suspect :p

Anyway, enough for now. My kid was very uninterested in the film and confused by it. But he likes Bucky so we are seeing Thunderbolts! Yay(?) That the trailers for that film give ZERO idea what the F the plot is or even much about the villain makes me fear it's gonna be yet another chopped up disjointed mess of scenes, but we'll see.




*"Sabra" is security advisor... I found her weird looking... Like Rachel Dratch a bit.

*The Leader's brain is orders of magnitude enhanced, partially by accident and mostly by Ross. He sees possibilities and probabilities in ways no one can... This was explained in the movie. He's like Sage from The Boys. As mastermind, he isn't SUPPOSED to be imposing... He certainly wasn't in The Incredible Hulk...

His plan wasn't to kill Ross... That was explicitly stated in the movie. Did you even watch it? He wanted to destroy his legacy. That's why Bradley missed on purpose. He wasn't trying to kill him. He wanted to turn him into the thing he hated the most. The mind control tells them what to do. It's not as "manual" as it was for Bucky, as in "once he's in the state, you have to tell him what to do".

*Isaiah Bradley wasn't hamfisted if you had watched F&TWS. He wasn't the first Captain America... He was the second. But after America tried to replicate the serum, he was one of the test subjects. He was TOO effective in the field so they arrested him on made up charges and kept him prisoner for 30 years. Sam only knew about him because of Bucky... Whom Isaiah beat years ago... Took off his arm, too!

*The Celestial Island is in international waters... And Japan was the first to discover Adamantium and shared that discovery with the world, which is how Ross knew. That was the whole point of Sam's mission in the beginning... Recover the Adamantium for Japan since it was THEIRS. The whole navy thing was saber rattling first until the American fighters fired on them through the Leader's brainwashing.

*We were focused on Ross and Cap... The VP might have been mentioned but Ross is a commanding figure so the President wasn't much part of anything... I did find that odd but that he wasn't at least in the bunker at the meetings... And no, Louis-Dreyfus isn't VP... She's CIA director, as explained in Black Panther 2

*Joaquin WAS called Falcon! Again, did you watch it? Because a lot of these points you're covering don't gel with the movie at all.

*Sam was given the shield in Endgame... Sam questioned himself again after everything... Steve said why ... Bucky said why.... And Bucky was right! The serum doesn't make someone Cap... It's what Sam is good at that does: his heart, heroism, inspiring others BECAUSE he's only human.

*The nanotech wasn't a Tony invention... It was Shuri's... Tony got it from her.
 
Last edited:

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
MC rating 42%


RT rating 51%


Older Cap movies got much better MC and RT ratings. On the plus side, CA: BNW is much better rated than some 1990 Cap movie that had Ned Beatty in it.
 
Last edited:

Ovek

7Member7
Watched this today. It's not bad but it really isn't good either. Everything looks mega cheap, poor camera work, poor lighting and bad editing. You can tell it's been stitched together in some desperate way to try and make something coherent.

The only thing that surprised me the entire movie was Harrison Ford actually tried and didn't phone in his performance.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
*"Sabra" is security advisor... I found her weird looking... Like Rachel Dratch a bit.
Israeli agent or former russian agent....neither makes a lick of sense.
*The Leader's brain is orders of magnitude enhanced, partially by accident and mostly by Ross. He sees possibilities and probabilities in ways no one can... This was explained in the movie. He's like Sage from The Boys. As mastermind, he isn't SUPPOSED to be imposing... He certainly wasn't in The Incredible Hulk...
See, if he is gonna be "super brain" and destroy Ross's legacy...you mean the VERY LEGACY HE HELPED HIM WITH? So The Leader in all his super wisdom allowed himself to be a prisoner for years and years with the master plan of getting Ross into the White House and ONLY THEN making him Hulk out over a contrived incident over Adamantium (how did he even predict any of that?). I'm sure there are tons of scenes on the cutting room floor about this plot but what's on screen is nonsensical.


*The Celestial Island is in international waters... And Japan was the first to discover Adamantium and shared that discovery with the world, which is how Ross knew. That was the whole point of Sam's mission in the beginning... Recover the Adamantium for Japan since it was THEIRS. The whole navy thing was saber rattling first until the American fighters fired on them through the Leader's brainwashing.

*We were focused on Ross and Cap... The VP might have been mentioned but Ross is a commanding figure so the President wasn't much part of anything... I did find that odd but that he wasn't at least in the bunker at the meetings... And no, Louis-Dreyfus isn't VP... She's CIA director, as explained in Black Panther 2

*Joaquin WAS called Falcon! Again, did you watch it? Because a lot of these points you're covering don't gel with the movie at all.
They VERY SPECIFICALLY make fun of him for wanting to be called Falcon in the beginning, only at the very end did Sam grace him with the Falcon name, codename, nome de plume, whatever it is or means.
*The nanotech wasn't a Tony invention... It was Shuri's... Tony got it from her.
Pretty sure Tony had "Flow like water" Iron Man suits before any post-Black Panther exchange of tech, but sure, go with that. Regardless, when his wings, helmet, and gear appear and disappear and seem to obey his thoughts, it takes him from being a man into a superman, which then undercuts the very worries and concerns he then has.

He takes TWENTY HULK SMASHES (I counted) and most of these were full on fury mode two handed overhead smashes. The kind of punishment even as Asgardian can't take. Yet Sam did and walked away with a sore shoulder. Give me a break.
Anyway, glad you liked it. Were I still invested in the ancillary content maybe more of it would have been okay for me, but as a "here is the MCU firing back up again" film it was a dud IMHO. I hope Thunderbolts isn't nearly as disjointed and forced to serve to tie up so many loose ends. Though since it's villain seems nebulous at best, who can say. Marvel has always struggled to deliver compelling villains who weren't straight "revenge on the hero" types (and in a since The Leader is basically that yet again) but had plans and agency of their own and I'm not sure they are getting any better at it.

I gotta wonder how bad the original sidekick villain was if he was replaced whole cloth by Esposito. Having Cap beat up a 66 year old guy isn't terribly exciting so I wonder what the deal was with that, unless its mainly for future films.
 

Vyse

Gold Member
Just saw it ... Ended about 3:50.


I REALLY enjoyed it! It went by fast. Didn't have one boring scene. I don't know what you lot are smoking but I had a BLAST!
I enjoyed it as well. If anything, felt like it was more of a Harrison Ford movie, which was a plus for me.

Only bump for me was the actress who played the widow character. Thought she was a morlock mutant.
 

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
I enjoyed it as well. If anything, felt like it was more of a Harrison Ford movie, which was a plus for me.

Only bump for me was the actress who played the widow character. Thought she was a morlock mutant.

Right! She could have been cut from the movie entirely and nothing would be different.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
Right! She could have been cut from the movie entirely and nothing would be different.
I'm curious what her role was pre-editing. Was she intended to represent "mutants" keeping an eye on Ross? Or be one that drove him to support or persecute them? The actress ranged from looking like that backwards speaking dude from Twin Peaks to kinda hot if you are into elves.

The dead Celestial baby being the source of adamantium...which apparently has medicinal properties, is a nice nod to fetal tissue being used for stem cell research, a hot button issue 20 years or so ago. It also echoes The Justice League (or maybe it was Bats vs Supes) which had mining an alien wreck as a source for stuff.

And I'll just say what we are all thinking, Liv Tyler is SUCH a down grade from Jennifer Connelly (and I'd say both Ford and Hurt are downgrades from Elliott). I was hoping for a Bana cameo at least, the Incredible Hulk had nods to the TV show.
 

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
I'm curious what her role was pre-editing. Was she intended to represent "mutants" keeping an eye on Ross? Or be one that drove him to support or persecute them? The actress ranged from looking like that backwards speaking dude from Twin Peaks to kinda hot if you are into elves.

The dead Celestial baby being the source of adamantium...which apparently has medicinal properties, is a nice nod to fetal tissue being used for stem cell research, a hot button issue 20 years or so ago. It also echoes The Justice League (or maybe it was Bats vs Supes) which had mining an alien wreck as a source for stuff.

And I'll just say what we are all thinking, Liv Tyler is SUCH a down grade from Jennifer Connelly (and I'd say both Ford and Hurt are downgrades from Elliott). I was hoping for a Bana cameo at least, the Incredible Hulk had nods to the TV show.

I think Liv has a pretty face ... I never really looked at her body. But I agree... Jennifer Connelly was better face wise.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
I think Liv has a pretty face ... I never really looked at her body. But I agree... Jennifer Connelly was better face wise.
I meant more for acting but maybe in the looks department as well. Jenn has that classic old hollywood grace and elegance, really classes up the joint. Liv, alas, peaked in her dads music videos. My well worn VHS of Stealing Beauty aside, of course :p
 

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
I meant more for acting but maybe in the looks department as well. Jenn has that classic old hollywood grace and elegance, really classes up the joint. Liv, alas, peaked in her dads music videos. My well worn VHS of Stealing Beauty aside, of course :p

Liv looked her best, to me, in the Lord of the Rings trilogy
 

ManaByte

Member
Seriously? That makes a lot of sense now.

She had a super suit and everything. You can see it under her jacket during the Indian Ocean scenes.

She explained that her Mutant powers manifested while she was a teenager in Tel Aviv.

Disney got scared of terrorist supporters attacking theaters playing the movie so they drastically cut down her role in edits and added ADR dialog explaining how she’s a former widow (notice how SHE never mentions it?).
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
She had a super suit and everything. You can see it under her jacket during the Indian Ocean scenes.

She explained that her Mutant powers manifested while she was a teenager in Tel Aviv.

Disney got scared of terrorist supporters attacking theaters playing the movie so they drastically cut down her role in edits and added ADR dialog explaining how she’s a former widow (notice how SHE never mentions it?).
What were her powers besides gymkata fighting? That bit was either reshot or it always looked very "widow-esque" in style.
 
For these Marvel side characters, their powers in the source material are usually 'whatever the plot requires at that moment' with no attempt at consistency or continiuty.
 
Last edited:

ManaByte

Member
What were her powers besides gymkata fighting?

Basically natural super soldier serum.

That bit was either reshot

The director himself confirmed that there weren't extensive reshoots and just one instance for the Serpent Society stuff.

Of course this is the internet and he's lying but the guy living in a room in his mom's house with a webcam and monetized YouTube account is telling the truth.
 
Last edited:

jason10mm

Gold Member
Basically natural super soldier serum.



The director himself confirmed that there weren't extensive reshoots and just one instance for the Serpent Society stuff.
.
You see the movie yet?

Her one big fight scene has her doing all the basic widow fight moves, it's the iron man 2 scarjo fight almost verbatim.

So either that was deliberate for some reason (she is hiding her true powers at that point or they just didn't know what else to do) or she originally was tossing guys around like dolls and they redid it when they depowered her.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
Uhh no, that's my own explanation so there's a clear frame of reference for people not familiar with the comics, like you.
So then you agree that allll the effort the MCU has been putting into trying to develop heroines is all for naught if "non-comic readers" such as myself (not true, but for the sake of argument we'll run with it) STILL have no frame of reference that includes them. You could have used She-Hulk, Ms. Marvel, Captain Marvel, Wasp, Ghost, Captain Carter, Gamora, Nebula, Don't call her Lady Thor, etc, but you didn't. Because NO ONE cares about those characters, not even folks familiar with the comics, much less folks who only consume the films or less. They have spent YEARS trying to get cultural penetration with these characters but still...nada. Tells you just how incredibly difficult it is and why they trade on the same 3-4 characters over and over.
 
So then you agree
No.
Dunno what weird crusade you're on but I would've made the same comparison regardless of gender because the frame of reference paints a clearer picture since their powersets are more consistent across film and source material, whereas others like thor or captain marvel are wildly different.
 

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
I have seen a bit of the Red Hulk fight against Captain Samerica on Youtube leaks.

It does not look good.

How the hell he survived the beatings when he is just a normal man, no super soldier serum at all?

Not even Steve could survive a fight with a Hulk.

Sam's suit and wings are vibranium, as is the shield. They absorb kinetic energy. That's how he survived.

To see how a super soldier fares against a Hulk, refer back to The Incredible Hulk with Hulk kicked Blonsky.
 
Last edited:

jason10mm

Gold Member
I saw it before you did. And there was just one period of reshoots. You can tell where they added Esposito and removed Rollins.
Presumably it wasn't JUST the scenes with esposito physically in them, they cut out the entire Serpent Society and collapsed it down to just Esposito, right? They also cut Rosa Salazar (who was fantastic in Brand New Cherry Flavor and would have been a bright spot in this film) and Rachel Leighton.

And I don't think the Esposito stuff was all of it. Blake Nelson said he had to come back as well and he had no scenes with Esposito, so what exactly was he refilming? Maybe some of those later scenes out of the black site that once were done by Serpent Society members? Most of those scenes were INCREDIBLY disjointed, like this predictive mastermind travelled to a SEAL training base right when the guy got the call about the pills, which, BTW, already had their formula written out on the paper Sam picked up, just to kill him when he could have anticipated this and arraigned a remote assassin
 

Doom85

Member
You could have used She-Hulk, Ms. Marvel, Captain Marvel, Wasp, Ghost, Captain Carter, Gamora, Nebula, Don't call her Lady Thor, etc, but you didn't. Because NO ONE cares about those characters, not even folks familiar with the comics

Both She-Hulk and Captain Marvel have had a good amount of various runs since the late 70’s.
Ms. Marvel has had a good amount of the runs in the past decade, which while does low in physical sales, but does quite well in digital sales.
I don’t follow Wasp solo really but I know she’s had runs.
I’m not overly familiar with Ghost, can’t comment there.
Jason Aaron’s whole run of Thor is considered one of the best modern Thor runs.
Now you’re really talking insane if you think Gamora and Nebula aren’t cared about. Even movie-only fans would wonder what the fuck you’re talking about. And in the comics, holy shit. Gamora is a main member of the 2008 run that revitalized the comic. And NEBULA? Tell me you haven’t read the actual Infinity Gauntlet comic without telling me you haven’t actually read the Infinity Gauntlet comic.

62T2Qon.jpeg


Tom Hiddleston What GIF


Pro-tip, Jason: if one confesses earlier in the thread they don’t follow comics, maybe don’t try to then later act like you have familiarity with the comics

Like, dude, what is the point of you shitting on things you don’t even know about? This is getting beyond obnoxious.
 
I have seen a bit of the Red Hulk fight against Captain Samerica on Youtube leaks.

It does not look good.

How the hell he survived the beatings when he is just a normal man, no super soldier serum at all?
Because vibranium. That's it. That's the explanation lol

Bucky shows up for a cameo just before the Hulk stuff happens so I was expecting some super soldier help but nope, it's just goofy ass Mackie talking down Red Hulk in front of a very obvious green screen.
 

MayauMiao

Member
Not even Steve could survive a fight with a Hulk.

Sam's suit and wings are vibranium, as is the shield. They absorb kinetic energy. That's how he survived.

To see how a super soldier fares against a Hulk, refer back to The Incredible Hulk with Hulk kicked Blonsky.

Sorry but the fight didn't sell. It boggles my mind why Sam kept his helmet on and off during the fight with RH. You would think during intense battles he would have the helmet up all the time to keep his un-super serum head safe from injuries.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
Not even Steve could survive a fight with a Hulk.

Sam's suit and wings are vibranium, as is the shield. They absorb kinetic energy. That's how he survived.

To see how a super soldier fares against a Hulk, refer back to The Incredible Hulk with Hulk kicked Blonsky.
He takes many full power double fisted strikes from a HULK. How much kinetic energy can these wings absorb? It's a believability busting move because it essentially makes Sam invulnerable. Hardly the worst thing in this film as he'll need all that juice for the big team films coming, it just makes the film yo-yo when he 'decides' to fight a human mano-y-mano and takes a cracked rib but then 'gets serious' with fighter jets and then 'super serious' taking down a Hulk. There is little personal threat to him and its hard for the audience to feel the stakes because he (and largely his sidekick 'almost Falcon' as well) can fly supersonic, effortlessly use drones and stuff, and keep a snarky attitude the whole way. I suppose it a bit of a "bitch eating crackers" because stuff like this is littered throughout the MCU, especially after the first couple of films, but if they want a serious tone they need to adjust the power levels and use the fights to address the characters (IMHO).

I realize most of these are overly pedantic and bordering on petty complaints. But given the overall mess of the film, the attempt to weave in a serious tone and tackle more mature themes clashes horribly with the dull, pedestrian plot contrivances and the cartoony action. How much of this lies at the feet of the inexperienced director versus a sloppy overly complicated script is hard to say. Or too much interference and demands from corporate? Regardless, its sad to see what should be one of the tentpole MCU films (I've always considered the Capt America and Avengers films to be the "Main Quest advancing" films) become a muddied sidequest to whatever the "big narrative" is.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
Pro-tip, Jason: if one confesses earlier in the thread they don’t follow comics, maybe don’t try to then later act like you have familiarity with the comics

Like, dude, what is the point of you shitting on things you don’t even know about? This is getting beyond obnoxious.
Pro-tip, Obnoxious is my middle name! If we can't shit talk FUCKING COMICS, then what's the point of "off-topic" Gaf?

I read lots of comics. But you could fill a ROOM, probably several, with the decades of runs of this stuff, and most of it is rushed out the door inconsistent "throw it against the wall to see what sticks" nonsense. There is no continuity or 'canon' in comics, I can dig up a one-shot that shows ANYTHING and that directly contradicts or retcons what came right before it. We are in the whole multi-verse mess because of some bizarre desire to make all possibilities co-exist instead of just making GOOD NARRATIVE EXPERIENCES that use these characters properly.

What did Sam learn over the course of the film? He's virtually identical. ROSS learned a bit. Bradley got some type of redemption (though within the film itself very little of it was explained). Kid Falcon got to finally be called Falcon (which again, is the title for whoever operates that particular suit or is it a personal affectation of just Sam?) and FINALLY got a little bit of mentoring from Sam on how to pull off a signature move because apparently Sam likes to withhold tactics until someone almost dies.

The MCU isn't the comics. Sam was Capt in some comic runs. So was Bucky. And like 20 other people. So it's pretty clear that there is no 'canon' Captain America in the comics as there are a hundred different narratives. So all you can really do is look at the MCU as it's own internal story and see if Sam as cap makes sense. And I don't think he does. As a vibranium powered Falcon he already exceeds virtually all other heroes. The shield is just another chunk of vibranium to him. So we are left with the symbolism of Captain America, which is, what exactly? The Enforcer of American Will? NATO's hitman? Earth's Defender? There is a point in BNW where Sam says "Ross wants me to lead the Avengers, that would make them take his commands" more or less. Uhhhh, Sam, aren't you ALREADY working for Ross? He's the Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces, who exactly is paying for all that gear and support team? Does Sam own the vibranium suit? Or the Shield? Is he just a mercenary? That's the kind of messy crap you get into when you try to 'get serious' about what is basically a kids story and you don't devote the proper time to exploring the meat. Bucky as Cap, within the MCU, has lots of good narrative directions that don't get nearly as entangled into contemporary real world issues and can maintain conflict with what has already been explored in the films, the big successful ones no less. Somehow he's acceptable enough to get elected to Congress but not as the symbol of American.....Justice? Freedom? Democracy? Equality? Dominance?

Surely even you can just take the MCU as it's own entity and see these conflicting elements. Cherry picking disparate elements of a multitude of comic runs and hammering them into a new cohesive whole is a very difficult task and is one that the MCU is failing at.
 
Top Bottom