Mista
Banned
Hell no. Nobody wants to wave their controller around for the whole gameGyro is great, but mouse & keyboard will always be the best solution for shooters. Gyro is definitely much better than using sticks.
Hell no. Nobody wants to wave their controller around for the whole gameGyro is great, but mouse & keyboard will always be the best solution for shooters. Gyro is definitely much better than using sticks.
It's all about combining sticks and gyro for that quick precision aim. We have a LOT of people here swearing by it and most of them actually wished for it to become a standard in next gen it felt like.Hell no. Nobody wants to wave their controller around for the whole game
I tried it couple of times on my Switch. Now its always turned offIt's all about combining sticks and gyro for that quick precision aim. We have a LOT of people here swearing by it and most of them actually wished for it to become a standard in next gen it felt like.
I never tried it, sounds fun though.
Crysis Remastered will focus on the original game’s single-player campaigns
At -30fpsHell no. Nobody wants to wave their controller around for the whole game
At -30fps
You literally just move you wrist for aiming. Don’t know about waving. I think you are doing it wrong.Hell no. Nobody wants to wave their controller around for the whole game
Yeah I was just exaggerating a bit. Still not convenient nor comfyYou literally just move you wrist for aiming. Don’t know about waving. I think you are doing wrong.
You don't really need to wave your controller around for gyro aiming, it's like saying you need to move your whole arm around to move the analog sticks on a controller. Most people like gyro as an assist, you set up your aim using the sticks then making fine adjustments with the gyro to line it up with more finesse.Hell no. Nobody wants to wave their controller around for the whole game
The BEST Far Cry game!Waiting long years now for Far Cry 1 remaster.
BY FAR cry,The BEST Far Cry game!
When it comes to graphics, Crytek is "almost" a generation ahead of other developers. Those guys made a last gen game that still looks better than most of the current gen games and it still has features that most games don't use. Crysis 3 is still one of the best looking game even after 7 years
Kingdom Come Deliverance on hi speced PC sometimes almost like a sneak peak at next gen, (in a way it kind of is because even the developers said the highest settings are there more as a future proof)
Crysis 1 port on console was underwhelming, but people forgot how good Crysis 3 was on 360, what miracle Cryteck was able to do with that limited hardware. One of the best looking game on that era, probably even better than Uncharted and Gears. Almost next gen on old gen hardware
When it comes to graphics, Crytek is "almost" a generation ahead of other developers. Those guys made a last gen game that still looks better than most of the current gen games and it still has features that most games don't use. Crysis 3 is still one of the best looking game even after 7 years
![]()
Crysis 1 port on console was underwhelming, but people forgot how good Crysis 3 was on 360, what miracle Cryteck was able to do with that limited hardware. One of the best looking game on that era, probably even better than Uncharted and Gears. Almost next gen on old gen hardware
Crysis 2 had some freedom yes, but it's not at all comparable to the first game, or even Far Cry. If people like the game that's fine, I personally thought the aliens weren't much fun to fight and the story was ridiculous, but most of all it doesn't deliver on what made me want to play Crysis in the first place.I would like to write something about Crysis 2, but it could be very complex and not feasible considering my english is not that good.
But I want to spend my two cents for Warhead, a well received Crysis I don't like and felt different from the others.
Warhead was made by Crytek Budapest, probably the first of their subsidiary team. It was a small studio and the result feels very different from the other games developed in Frankfurt.
Warhead was very linear, the true COD on Crysis franchise, much more than Crysis 2 who still had some freedom.
Crysis 2 had some freedom yes, but it's not at all comparable to the first game, or even Far Cry. If people like the game that's fine, I personally thought the aliens weren't much fun to fight and the story was ridiculous, but most of all it doesn't deliver on what made me want to play Crysis in the first place.
Crysis is an absolutely terrible game, and yes ive completed it. Everything about it is from the bad old school of pc fps design that we've mostly dumped. The story, actual character designs, acting, plot twists, game flow, its utter shit. Genuinely, do not buy this, it is complete crap.
Yep i agree 100%. Crysis 3 maxed out on PC looks better than anything released this gen imo, and its a last gen PC game lol.When it comes to graphics, Crytek is "almost" a generation ahead of other developers. Those guys made a last gen game that still looks better than most of the current gen games and it still has features that most games don't use. Crysis 3 is still one of the best looking game even after 7 years
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
WatYep i agree 100%. Crysis 3 maxed out on PC looks better than anything released this gen imo, and its a last gen PC game lol.
Ah, so YOU are part of the reason why modern first-person shooters suck, unlike Crysis.Crysis is an absolutely terrible game, and yes ive completed it. Everything about it is from the bad old school of pc fps design that we've mostly dumped. The story, actual character designs, acting, plot twists, game flow, its utter shit. Genuinely, do not buy this, it is complete crap.
modern first-person shooters suck, unlike Crysis
Ah, so YOU are part of the reason why modern first-person shooters suck, unlike Crysis.
The industry:it just doesnt match the industry, which has dumped the old baggage of 20 year old design.
I'm gonna reinstall and play past the intro asapYep i agree 100%. Crysis 3 maxed out on PC looks better than anything released this gen imo, and its a last gen PC game lol.
Eh, it still looks last gen. Not saying it's not a great looking game or anything but you can see the 'oldness' compared to modern engines.Yep i agree 100%. Crysis 3 maxed out on PC looks better than anything released this gen imo, and its a last gen PC game lol.
It was an over exaggeration, Kingdom Come Deliverance is mindblowing. I mean even Killzone Shadow Fall arguably looks better, at least that game has PBR, Crysis 3 had to fake it I believe.Eh, it still looks last gen. Not saying it's not a great looking game or anything but you can see the 'oldness' compared to modern engines.
XBOX 360 framerate can be tweaked easily both in Crysis 2 and Crysis 3. All game assets are included in renamed zip files (.pak). Through xbox360.cfg you can configure the vsync and the framerate limiter. Setting vsync off and 60FPS, framerate is all over the place but there are some rare instances where the game reaches 60 frames per second.It should be noted Crysis 2 and 3 on X360 runs constantly below 30fps, however as strange as it sounds both games are still responsive and playable despite running in sub 30fps (maybe because of motion blur or PERFECT thumbsticks sensitivity). But performance aside I think crysis 2-3 (despite being downgraded from PC) are clearly above every other game on xbox 360 in technical aspect. Even Gears Of War 3 no longer looks so good if someone will play crysis 2 or 3 first. I think only TLOU on PS3 looks comparable to crysis 2-3 running on xbox.
As someone who has played both, how is Killzone looking better? Its not because it released on last gen that its a last gen game, if you saw there trailer you would know that Crysis 3 on pc is actaully the first next gen game. Even pure from a technical stand point Killzone is not even on the same level as Crysis 3 on pc. The PS4 can't even run Crysis 3 at 1080p 30fps with very high settings.It was an over exaggeration, Kingdom Come Deliverance is mindblowing. I mean even Killzone Shadow Fall arguably looks better, at least that game has PBR, Crysis 3 had to fake it I believe.
As someone who has played both, how is Killzone looking better? Its not because it released on last gen that its a last gen game, if you saw there trailer you would know that Crysis 3 on pc is actaully the first next gen game. Even pure from a technical stand point Killzone is not even on the same level as Crysis 3 on pc. The PS4 can't even run Crysis 3 at 1080p 30fps with very high settings.
Yes i know, but my post was a answer toOf course not. Almost no console games run at very high settings though across the board. So right off the bat you putting it in a difficult situation. Also, Crysis is a high end 2013 game. Ps4 was not a high end console in 2013. Especially considering it launched with a tablet CPU. It probably would not run at those specs, but why would it?
The industry:
Doom (Reboot of an old school shooter series)
Wolfenstein (Reboot of an old school shooter series)
Shadow Warrior (Reboot of an old school shooter)
Ion Fury (old school throwback shooter)
Star Wars Battlefront (reboot of an old school shooter series)
XIII (remake/remaster of an old school shooter)
Prey (reboot of an old school shooter by 3D Realms/game very reminiscent of System Shock, an old school shooter series)
Sniper Ghost Warrior 3 (open world sandbox)
Far Cry series (open world sandbox)
Metro Exodus (open world sandbox)
Rage 2 (open world sandbox)
Borderlands 3 (openworld sandbox, loot)
Homefront 2 (openworld sandbox)
Killzone: SF (openworld sandbox)
Call of Duty series (design philosophy was there since the original from 2003. They perfected it in 2007 and since then ran with it. Its reminiscent of Medal of Honor, another old school shooter series)
Battlefield 1 (not quite an open world, but open design in SP)
A anyone
feel free to add