qwertz12345
Banned
This is why the idea of "inclusivity" doesn't work.That is factually incorrect. Is science transphobic?
The trans argument is completely circular and devoid of any logic. Trans activists will claim gender is a social construct when you bring science however will continue to wear makeup, dresses and long hair in an effort to fit within said social norms. Is THAT the true definition of a woman? Is "womanhood" an article of clothing you can throw on one day after waking up? Lmfao.
In case you have forgotten, here is the definition of a woman or female:
Biology. of, relating to, or being a person with a certain combination of sex characteristics, commonly including two X chromosomes in the cell nuclei, a vagina, a uterus and ovaries.
For example, if I saw that "Brony" who instigated the firing of that LRG employee in a restaurant, I'd feel pretty sick. In fact, I wouldn't be able to finish my meal.
It's almost like that scene in Seven... We've become so accustomed to degeneracy, that we're now at a stage where we encourage it as being the new "normal"... Well, it's not normal.
If a woman looks like a woman, and has all the (biological) characteristics of a woman, then she's a woman.
Anyone who refutes that is refuting reality.
If I wear a black face, that doesn't mean that I am black.
Likewise, a man who dresses as a woman isn't a woman.
Last edited: