• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Is it important that your partner change his/her last name when you get married?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The only question is whether or not I take my partners last name. I prefer that we share a name as it feels more like a family. That plus I like her last name more. It would feel weird because your last name does become a part of your identity. I haven't decided whether to take hers or keep mine yet but most likely I'll take hers.

Also, with children, the benefit of the doubt lies with the female in the courts by default. My wife decides to leave me and says she's taking the kids - chances are I get dual custody, if i'm lucky. More likely She keeps the kids and I get visitation

What makes you think this would be any different if you weren't married?
 

JMizzlin

Member
I've got a pretty plain last name (not super common, just not exciting) and the women I've dated have all had exciting last names.

If I were to have gotten serious with any of them I'd have happily compromised when it came to last names. I'd feel terrible taking a unique and cool name from someone.

That said, when it came to kids: as the only son of my family I want to keep the name going. It just feels like my responsibility.
 

Koppai

Member
Me nor my husband changed our last names at all. I'm thinking that it might be a good idea for him to make it easier to get a job though.
 

turtle553

Member
My wife never took my last name even though she was the only one in her family with it(her mom remarried and her brother had that last name) and she never saw her father. Her not taking my name I think was an indication she really didn't want to be together and now we are split up. I guess it really depends on the reason for not taking the last name.
 
It's pretty common for women to not share a last name with their children. A lot of single women who aren't married to the father, still give the child the father's last name. Also, a lot of professional women (myself included) keep our last names after marriage, but still give the child the last name of the father. It's really not that weird and it's something men could learn to adjust to (and they may have to, since I suspect this issue will become more common). Regardless of names, if you're involved in your child's life, they will grow up knowing you are their parent and loving you just the same.
In the unlikely situation that I ever were to have kids, I'd have them take his last name if he cares because I don't mind either way.
 

BriGuy

Member
My wife kept her last name. I kind of insisted actually. She's a doctor and has a super common last name, whereas mine is one of a kind. We reasoned it would make it harder for any potentially crazy patients to track her down.

Our dog has my last name though (at least according to prescription bottles).
 
No, not at all. I mean, it's their name, not mine. They're the one who has to be happy and satisfied with it, whatever they decide. And as long as they're happy, I'll be happy. Everything else is just details we can work out together as adults. The important thing is that it's their choice and they're happy with it, whatever that may be.
 

Two Words

Member
So the woman can have a condition of not taking my name, but I can't have any conditions. Gotcha.

How about you both do yourselves a favor and find people that you can spend your time with and not carry such volatile attitudes towards? If somebody wants to get married, then I guess they want to get married. That's not the same as wanting somebody else to TAKE YOUR NAME.
 

Two Words

Member
I also don't have to get married. Back to square one I suppose.



You're right. Common law has the same pitfalls. However it also does not have the financial drain of marriage.

I once dated a girl who was against having sex unless we were married. I was against it and we broke up. That doesn't mean that just because a girl once threw an ultimatum at me that any ultimatum I make is now magically justified.
 

Keri

Member
In the unlikely situation that I ever were to have kids, I'd have them take his last name if he cares because I don't mind either way.

I posted earlier, but our son has my last name as his middle name and my husband's last name as his last name. We wanted our child to feel connected to both names and, because my husband is awesome, he was completely open to switching the order. In the end though, I'm glad we gave our son his name: I had 9 months of special bonding with kiddo and its looking like kiddo has inherited my traits (red hair and blue eyes). So, I'm glad he can share his name with his dad. I'm certain he'll love us both the same though, regardless.
 
How about you both do yourselves a favor and find people that you can spend your time with and not carry such volatile attitudes towards? If somebody wants to get married, then I guess they want to get married. That's not the same as wanting somebody else to TAKE YOUR NAME.

How about you get off your high horse and not browbeat someone just for having a differing opinion?

I've said it many times. No woman HAS to take my name, just as I don't HAVE to be married. I have plenty of friends who took their wives' last names, or didn't take anyone's name. That works for them just fine, but not me.
 

Two Words

Member
How about you get off your high horse and not browbeat someone just for having a differing opinion?

I've said it many times. No woman HAS to take my name, just as I don't HAVE to be married. I have plenty of friends who took their wives' last names, or didn't take anyone's name. That works for them just fine, but not me.

People disagree with your view. Deal with it. Why bother stating it if you won't accept a countering view?
 

mhayes86

Member
Nah, she wants to though, but she's waiting until after our honeymoon so she doesn't have to change her passport beforehand.
 
I'm totally leaving the name thing up to whatever woman is crazy enough to marry me. Hell, I'm not even sure about marriage. Common-law seems easier.
 

Banglish

Member
How about you get off your high horse and not browbeat someone just for having a differing opinion?

I've said it many times. No woman HAS to take my name, just as I don't HAVE to be married. I have plenty of friends who took their wives' last names, or didn't take anyone's name. That works for them just fine, but not me.

And that's completely fine. We're just giving you our opinions as to why we feel that is wrong. It seems like you're purely equating marriage to simply taking your name when a totally different set of factors should be the case for marriage or common law.. maybe such as your happiness together, the potential you see for a future.. etc..
 

br3wnor

Member
My wife hyphenated our names, if it wasn't for possibility of kids and the confusion of them having a different last name she would have just fully kept her last name. I wasnt changing my last name to hers so I didn't care if she did the same.

Alot of older family members on both sides had a HUGE problem with it though, I thought that was pretty funny and actually made me more and more happy with her decision.
 

Kaizer

Banned
When I get married, I really want my future wife to keep her last name & just hyphenate it with mine if she wants to. Don't know why but hyphenated last names have always been pretty cool to me. I'd also hyphenate my last name if she wanted me to.
 
People disagree with your view. Deal with it. Why bother stating it if you won't accept a countering view?
I have no problem with you disagreeing with me. Life will go on regardless. My problem is with you acting as if i'm oppressing my future wife, or Liu Kang throwing out some bullshit assertion that having this position makes me a misogynist. What garbage.

And that's completely fine. We're just giving you our opinions as to why we feel that is wrong. It seems like you're purely equating marriage to simply taking your name when a totally different set of factors should be the case for marriage or common law.. maybe such as your happiness together, the potential you see for a future.. etc..

I'm not. As i've said everything i've said i'm taking from personal experience. The major point that i'm trying to get across here is that if I don't want to get married and do so anyway, there is no difference between that and the woman not wanting to take my name and doing so anyway. Many posters in here have inexplicably assigned my request (taking my name) a higher weight than the other concession. (getting married). I don't see how that is all fair, unless me buckling because i'm a man is your position.
 

Two Words

Member
I have no problem with you disagreeing with me. Life will go on regardless. My problem is with you acting as if i'm oppressing my future wife, or Liu Kang throwing out some bullshit assertion that having this position makes me a misogynist. What garbage.



I'm not. As i've said everything i've said i'm taking from personal experience. The major point that i'm trying to get across here is that if I don't want to get married and do so anyway, there is no difference between that and the woman not wanting to take my name and doing so anyway. Many posters in here have inexplicably assigned my request (taking my name) a higher weight than the other concession. (getting married). I don't see how that is all fair, unless me buckling because i'm a man is your position.
I'm saying if something so petty would be an issue with you about marriage, don't get married. Just like how if your attitude is "I get to name the kids or no kids", then you probably shouldn't have kids.


It is incredibly weird to have the attitude "marriage is meaningless" and also hold the attitude "You must take my name if we get married". It just makes no sense.
 

Big Nikus

Member
I would feel uncomfortable if my future wife took my name. That's not fair. I've only seriously thought about it in the recent years and yeah, I'm glad things are changing. There's the matter of the kids though, I'm worried that my family name will disappear if they don't have my name, but hey, so is she. So I guess we'll flip a coin.

Also, look at this dude:

2Xz9Wds.jpg

Well his birth name is Eiji Onozuka. He took his wife's name when they married. He's cool.
 

Banglish

Member
I'm saying if something so petty would be an issue with you about marriage, don't get married. Just like how if your attitude is "I get to name the kids or no kids", then you probably shouldn't have kids.


It is incredibly weird to have the attitude "marriage is meaningless" and also hold the attitude "You must take my name if we get married". It just makes no sense.

I feel like the weirdest part about it is that it isn't because of heritage/lineage(all that mess), it's the potential fallout where he loses everything. Which I can understand. However, seeing that one is that worried about fallout, even if the S/O does take the last name - does it lay all worries to rest?
 

Two Words

Member
I feel like the weirdest part about it is that it isn't because of heritage/lineage(all that mess), it's the potential fallout where he loses everything. Which I can understand. However, seeing that one is that worried about fallout, even if the S/O does take the last name - does it lay all worries to rest?

Yeah, that's what I don't get. Sure, marriage has its shitty parts. None of which are resolved by your partner taking your name.


This seems ironic.

If you disagree with me, I'm not going to tell you to not tell me that you disagree with me.
 
It is not important, but I would like to take advantage of it. Like, if she is a Rothschild I would like to change my last name to that and even switch for a matching first name. But if she is a Perez, then I'm keeping my last name and she can choose whatever.
 
if the child gets both last names doesn't that make names really really long after a few generations?

Possibly, but kids will likely choose one or the other to go by. My name is hyphenated on a bunch of legal documents (birth certificate, driver's license, etc) but I fill out most forms with just my mother's last name and will probably just take that last name into consideration if I ever get married. Basically if it's too long to fit on forms or be a PITA to write, people will be more likely to just go "meh I'll use this one."

It is not important, but I would like to take advantage of it. Like, if she is a Rothschild I would like to change my last name to that and even switch for a matching first name. But if she is a Perez, then I'm keeping my last name and she can choose whatever.

This. I don't have a problem taking someone else's last name, especially if it's a kickass one. A plain/common/ugly name and we might have to find some middle ground.
 

Walpurgis

Banned
I would never allow someone to take on my name. It doesn't make any sense to me and is actually a quite creepy, tbh. I actually like the idea of having a different last name from my wife and children. It comes in handy when doing references and the like. 😋
 

gardfish

Member
Up to them, although that does raise the question of what any hypothetical kids' last names will be. My significant other already has a hyphenated last name, adding a third name to it will get really unwieldy.
 

Banglish

Member
I'm not. As i've said everything i've said i'm taking from personal experience. The major point that i'm trying to get across here is that if I don't want to get married and do so anyway, there is no difference between that and the woman not wanting to take my name and doing so anyway. Many posters in here have inexplicably assigned my request (taking my name) a higher weight than the other concession. (getting married).
Wat?!

"I don't want to get married and do so anyway".. that doesn't make sense to me. You either want to get married, or don't want to get married, or are keeping your options open/unsure. If you don't want to get married - don't do it.


I don't see how that is all fair, unless me buckling because i'm a man is your position.
I have no idea what you're saying here.
 

LionPride

Banned
I like how people in here think it's a good idea to compare changing a last fucking name to racism and Civil Fuckin' Rights.
 

El-Suave

Member
I would prefer if my partner took my name or I'd take hers. Honestly, double names are a bit of a pet peeve of mine since I didn't get along as well with teachers who had them as opposed to those who had single names. Purely anecdotal and meaningless but it's a fun cliche I cultivate.
 

sangreal

Member
It's not important to me at all, but I would expect my kids to have my name and as someone who was raised by a single mom who does not share my name I think it would be a shame for my wife to have a different name than her kids
 

Two Words

Member
I like how people in here think it's a good idea to compare changing a last fucking name to racism and Civil Fuckin' Rights.

I don't get this. Sexism and racism are both shitty. Are we really going to have a tier list of human atrocities? And the only thing I compared it to was how people thought it was "old-fashioned" to strictly only allow themselves to marry someone of the same race. Being "old-fashioned" is often just a euphemism for "being hardheaded and unwilling to accept progressive changes.
 

LionPride

Banned
I don't get this. Sexism and racism are both shitty. Are we really going to have a tier list of human atrocities? And the only thing I compared it to was how people thought it was "old-fashioned" to strictly only allow themselves to marry someone of the same race. Being "old-fashioned" is often just a euphemism for "being hardheaded and unwilling to accept progressive changes.

But comparing something that is seen as an option by the average person, an option that a person can be fine with or not, to racism makes me feel some type of way. I understand the sentiment, but it just makes me feel some type of way when it's compared to Racism
 
When my ex and I used to talk about it, we agreed he'd take my last name because we both liked it better. With my next partner, it's probably going to depend on who has the better name.
 

Banglish

Member
My man, I kinda take issue when I see someone compares this and black people Civil Rights.

Fair enough. I never compared 'em though. But I do think putting precedence on a single minority group is a disservice to all minority groups. I'm brown, I'm an atheist, and I'm bi. People hate me on every front. I feel some type a way, when people talk about race, gender, orientation or religion.
Im just saying
zFFtX3t.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom