Then you'd be missing out on one of the most purest racers in years. Shame really.
Purest?
Then you'd be missing out on one of the most purest racers in years. Shame really.
There are also a lot of people on those DC threads, myself included, who really do not like the handling model DC uses. But let's completely ignore the countless DC impressions in which thousands of people who actually own and play the game have been disappointed with the handling for two months now. It's all about "the rest of the internet".
I can do it too. It doesn't make you or me correct.
Why are missing out the fact that I'm talking about DC threads? What are "countless impressions"? Impressions from where? The "rest of the internet"? The vast, vast majority of people in DC threads have sung its praises. I know, I've been keeping up with pretty much every DC thread there is. "Thousands" have not been disappointed in DC threads, at all, far from it in fact. As i said, the vast majority is composed of people who love it. And it's funny how the person I was replying to decided to use IGN and metacritic as a way to represent the "majority" rather than the majority of people in DC threads.
So no, you can't do it too, because that's bullshit.
People who are disappointed in a game don't generally hang out for long in threads about that game.
The vast majority of people in threads for any game (ignoring Ubisoft titles) will sing praises for that title. There's always going to be a bias in forum threads. I prefer FH2 to Driveclub, Gran Turismo to Forza Motorsport. I like the gameplay better in FH2, but I own both games and I respect that both games are good at their own respects. Driveclub is good at getting you right into a race with no fuss. Forza is good at giving you the opportunity to enjoy driving. I like that you don't have to race in Forza Horizon. You can do whatever you want, but when you do want to race it can provide some of the best racing available anywhere because of its well fleshed out tuning and customization system and excellent course design.Why are you missing out the fact that I'm talking about DC threads? What are "countless impressions"? Impressions from where? The "rest of the internet"? The vast, vast majority of people in DC threads have sung its praises. I know, I've been keeping up with pretty much every DC thread there is. "Thousands" have not been disappointed in DC threads, at all, far from it in fact. As I said, the vast majority is composed of people who love it. And it's funny how the person I was replying to decided to use IGN and metacritic as a way to represent the "majority" rather than the majority of people in DC threads.
So no, you can't do it too, because that's bullshit.
The vast majority of people in threads for any game (ignoring Ubisoft titles) will sing praises for that title. There's always going to be a bias in forum threads. I prefer FH2 to Driveclub, Gran Turismo to Forza Motorsport. I like the gameplay better in FH2, but I own both games and I respect that both games are good at their own respects. Driveclub is good at getting you right into a race with no fuss. Forza is good at giving you the opportunity to enjoy driving. I like that you don't have to race in Forza Horizon. You can do whatever you want, but when you do want to race it can provide some of the best racing available anywhere because of its well fleshed out tuning and customization system and excellent course design.
More on topic. Driveclub hands down has the best weather system. Volumetric clouds are awesome, the lighting is probably the best of any game this gen so far, and the environments are well designed. It is missing tire spray effects, wind effecting the rain, and it seems like it's either tons of rain or none all. Lighting bolts don't reflect in puddles on the road or on the car, but they do illuminate the sky with a round blue ball.
Lighting bolts don't reflect in puddles on the road or on the car, but they do illuminate the sky with a round blue ball.
Quick gif showing how storms light up the race.
Open world racer or burst! Amirite? Amirite? /sI never said its no fun to play its an ok racer with fantastic graphics, the reviews scores and majority opinion reflect this.
and I agree there is not as next genish lighting and effects as there are in driveclub, which does make the differences look more subtle but its still a great looking game that has an overall visual package that still looks significantly better then anything last gen.
as demonstrated here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oJOEbsXiLk
Show me a reflected lightning bolt in DC then. I've tried to get one and it doesn't work. The lightning does light up the environment which is cool (especially at night) but I can't get an actual reflection of lightning. The best I get get is a blue ball from what I assume is the light source they use to light up the environment.Lightning does reflect on the environment. The photo you posted just isn't in the right angle.
Pretty much. Now someone demands a reflection of lightning in DC. Next up on the list, are the crowds really 3D? Do they pop in as you zoom past them at 200 mph?I see we've been reduced to nitpicking. Marvellous.
Pretty much. Now someone demands a reflection of lightning in DC. Next up on the list, are the crowds really 3D? Do they pop in as you zoom past them at 200 mph?
It's great fun. I DEMAND GRAVEL.
I don't think reflected lightning is too much to ask for in a game that uses SSR. Its a weird omission when everything else reflects.I see we've been reduced to nitpicking. Marvellous.
Ah I see. Well I'll keep my eye out the next time I play . Maybe reducing the exposure can reveal the bolt of lighting reflecting off the road.Show me a reflected lightning bolt in DC then. I've tried to get one and it doesn't work. The lightning does light up the environment which is cool (especially at night) but I can't get an actual reflection of lightning. The best I get get is a blue ball from what I assume is the light source they use to light up the environment.
That pic you showed is the light from the lightning reflecting on the road, I'm talking something like this:
It's hard enough to race in heavy rain/snow. Don't give Evolution any ideas!I see your gravel and raise you a fogging up windscreen due to the humidity in wet conditions.
But is the humidity volumetric? Does it pop in 2 feet in front of you?I see your gravel and raise you a fogging up windscreen due to the humidity in wet conditions.
I'm not great with photography but if you can find me one it would be super cool (will gladly eat crow). I'll give it another shot too.Ah I see. Well I'll keep my eye out the next time I play . Maybe reducing the exposure can reveal the bolt of lighting reflecting off the road.
Ah I see. Well I'll keep my eye out the next time I play . Maybe reducing the exposure can reveal the bolt of lighting reflecting off the road.
Yeah that sounds like it's probably the case. I'm going to do a bit of experimenting in photo mode todayIt's possible the angle/distance doesn't play well with the screen-space reflections. It's the same way at certain angles, if the top of a speed banner is above the edge of the screen, it'll just stretch down beyond that point further than it would normally as filler so it doesn't just cut off. The lighting flare-up is a nice enough stand in, if this is the case. I'd bet either way it's more down to angle than exposure.
I don't think reflected lightning is too much to ask for in a game that uses SSR. Its a weird omission when everything else reflects.
More on topic. Driveclub hands down has the best weather system. Volumetric clouds are awesome, the lighting is probably the best of any game this gen so far, and the environments are well designed. It is missing tire spray effects, wind effecting the rain, and it seems like it's either tons of rain or none all. Lighting bolts don't reflect in puddles on the road or on the car, but they do illuminate the sky with a round blue ball.
I have to upload my pics but I got a bunch. It doesn't reflect (just a circle from what i assume is the light source reflects) but that didn't stop me from getting some awesome pictures. What's more surprising to me is that the fireworks don't have any noticeable reflection either.Yeah that sounds like it's probably the case. I'm going to do a bit of experimenting in photo mode today
True, but that doesn't change the fact that the person I was replying to chose a few metacritic reviews and IGN as a basis to claim that DC is an "ok" racer, and calling that "the majority opinion", rather than the thousands of people in DC threads who would say the opposite. That just screams bias to me.
Notice I put ''etc etc'', every site people mention the gameplay is not great.
and you say the majority of people say great things about it, but you only include GAF.
Even here on neogaf schennmu said ''This narrative that DC is not fun to play is there to stay, right?'
Theres no bias about it, people say while the game has fantastic visuals there are some negatives on the gameplay.
It's simple to me if you haven't played the game, anything you say about gameplay can't be taken serious.
Evolution needs to work on the way rain looks at night when your headlights hits it. Looks very unrealistic. Looks like Killzone Shadow Fall's rain.
Notice I put ''etc etc'', every site people mention the gameplay is not great.
and you say the majority of people say great things about it, but you only include GAF.
Theres no bias about it,
people say while the game has fantastic visuals there are some negatives on the gameplay
But your basing your opinion off what someone else is saying without even playing the games, to see how it looks in front of you. I've seen DC foe myself and it does look good , you on the other hand is taking second hand accounts of fh2.Do you have to play two games to figure out which looks better? It's all visual, youtube/gamersyde/any hosting site should suffice.
If he said one has a better handling model than the other, then your statement might seem more appropriate.
It's simple to me if you haven't played the game, anything you say about gameplay can't be taken serious.
The visual distraction should be the rain gathering on the windshield. Everything looks great until I see the rain at night from cockpit view -- looks like white sparks.In almost every other way they have some of the best downpour rain in the business, but I see exactly what you mean. I know it's not as simple as this, but just having the headlights highlight the falling rain at a lower opacity would go a long way toward helping. In snow, I notice the headlights don't have the sort of cutoff line near eye-level for projection that I notice driving myself, so it looks more like a star-field than it might in heavy precip.
I'm not really complaining, because I think visual distraction can make racing titles more exciting, and there's not many options like what Evo pulled off with the updates. I'm also someone who thought the use of sunlight in the more recent Forza games is deliberate and desirable. Specifically when I noticed that the coloration on the sun-glare for most tracks (specifically, FM5) obscures the driving line, I thought that was a fantastic way to balance out environment with assists.
I agree.
And every site people also mention the gameplay is great. Again you're only focusing on the negative.
No, you're misunderstanding me. I said the majority of people in DC threads sing its praises, not "the majority" full stop, like you did.
There is bias in your posts. You're trying to objectively prove that the game is "ok" based on what certain sites say, while completely ignoring a huge group of people who say otherwise. You're only paying attention to the people who share your opinion, and conveniently forgetting to mention the thousands of people on here who say the game is more than just "ok".
And, again, 'people' also say the game is fantastic and has positives on the gameplay. You keep doing this over and over again, using subjective comments as a way to objectively prove something about DC. It doesn't work like that. You can't just say DC is "ok" because certain sites and "people" say so.
What...
You agree?
Have you played DC?
Because if you haven't, then agreeing with him makes no sense as what he is saying would include you too. Lol.
Which is simply not true. The only thing I was trying to prove was that ''the gamer opinion of DRIVECLUB is extremely positive.'' is not true.
There might be loads of fan threads in gaf praising the game to be the best racer in the world, but every site , including this one does mention gameplay issues.
You cant prove a game is , god, bad or whatever, its an opinion
which is what I should of said to this statement ''the gamer opinion of DRIVECLUB is extremely positive.'' in which I was originally replying to.
Its funny Lukas , SolidSnakex was doing the same as what you accusing me of doing, yet you didnt reply to him/her once?
I have played driveclub and I was agreeing that you cant take anyone seriously who has not played the game.
"It's not bias, DC is a medicore game, 'people' have confirmed".
There might be loads of fan threads in gaf praising the game to be the best racer in the world, but every site , including this one does mention gameplay issues.
The one thing that worries me about DC is Jeff G's comments about the handling - stopping way too easily - removing the challenge?
It seems a little too forgiving, but I'm sure I will get used to it and adjust my cornering/braking accordingly.
Hmm, a shame thanks.
I guess if that allows for opportunities for taking the corner and exiting it much faster than if you were to brake late and keep going then I wouldn't have a problem with it.
If you are racing another guy, and you take the corner with the utmost grace and he goes in full speed, brakes on the corner and comes out and he's right behind you, without much distance between you, I'd be less happy.
Do I need to quote you? Because that's not what you were doing. You said the game was just "ok" and that reviews and majority opinion reflected that. The comment you were replying to doesn't even make any sense. What the hell is the "gamer opinion"?
So now you're trying to change your argument from DC being an "ok" game because IGN and metacritic say so, to it has some "gameplay issues"? Come on, man. Of course every site is going to have people who say it has gameplay issues, just like every site will also have some people will think it has none. But that isn't what you were trying to prove, you tried to prove that DC was just an "ok" game because certain sites say so and that was the majority opinion. Which is bullshit.
Which, ironically, is my entire point.
You should have...but you didn't. Instead you tried to use subjective comments as a way to objectively prove something. It doesn't matter if the person you were replying to was talking out of his ass, two wrongs don't make a right.
Unfortunately, I'm not omnipresent. Sorry. And I don't feel like I should be persecuted for not being so.
Ok, cool. Good to know. Still begs the question why you were so adamant on using the views of other people to try and prove something about a game, and trying to pass off those views and opinions as the majority opinion, rather than just give your own opinion on DC as a game.
Lol, exactly. I don't know how people type this kind of shit with a straight face, let alone press 'Enter' on their keyboards and actually post it.
I did a few races earlier with just me and one AI player on the track, and I tried to overtake the AI driver by being fast and aggressive, just like how you just described, and I failed. It just widened the gap between us. Don't worry, driving lines and skill definitely still matter.
.webm's or bust.
Can GAF host webms?
Ah okay that's good, that's what I was worried about.
Maybe a game more rewarding in multiplayer than just hot laps?
Do the top speeds feel faster than in other games?
DC probably has the best sense of speed in a game I've ever played. Probably partially do to the camera shake while moving fast.