• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Penn Gillette defends violent media (and Call of Duty) on a talk show

Status
Not open for further replies.

GrizzNKev

Banned
I still can't figure out how people like Wendy Williams get into positions where their opinions are broadcast on television.

Well, I do know, but I have a hard time dealing with it.
 

Kinitari

Black Canada Mafia
i'm sure he has an episode of Penn & Teller BS about it, they do lots of different subjects.


He is right in this argument. Mass shooting pale in comparison to car accidents every year, swimming pool drownings, things you don't hear about. Mass shootings happen in such small amounts compared to what people "say" happens with all of the guns and crazy people out there in America. And it propagates a culture of fear.

I don't disagree with him about mass shootings, I think it's just irresponsible to say "Mass shootings are rare, therefore let's not worry about guns".

Gun violence occurs outside mass shootings, and guns are just one issue of a multifaceted issue that most likely explains exactly why violent crime is soooo high in the US compared to pretty much any other developed nation. You need to address gun culture, you need to address poverty and social nets, you need to address the effects of locking people up so easily (1/6th of people in the US in jail because of marijuanna related crimes, criminals much more likely to become reliant on the system or repeat crime in the US, disproportionately high amount of minorities in the system etc).

Tackling just ONE of these problems doesn't do the issue of violent crime justice, tackling them all is what will get you the best results.

When he talks about priorities he means that we should focus on things that actually kill people. More (many?) people die per year from preventable disease than mass shootings, so we should focus on that as a society. More kids drown per year than are murdered, so instead of making them scared a classmate is going to kill the, we should build fences around pools.

I would assume that Penn's reaction to your question would be to ask whether you have concrete evidence that gun culture effects an area's violence or whether the effect is "obvious" to you the way it's obvious to that legendary news anchor that CoD trains autistic kids to murder.

Even if there was, I doubt he'd show much interest in a marginalization campaign since there's the other more deadly concerns he brought up to tackle first.

Violent crime actually kills people - it kills a lot of people. Let's not just point out mass shootings. I agree that things -should- be prioritized, but it's not as simple as "okay, lets solve pools first then we'll move on to the next one". Prioritization doesn't mean tackling things one at a time, it means putting emphasis on things that are more important to emphasize. I think that drownings require LESS prioritization than violent crime because a lot of drownings you can't do much about, you can educate parents to be careful when they take their kids to the beach or to a lake or to the pool - you can tell them to build fences around their pools in their backyards, but that's -basically- it. With violent crime, there are SOOOO many factors that play into it, and violent crime effects more than just children, it effects everyone. Violent crime is also just ONE symptom of the many issues you find in societies that need to be resolved, so... again, it's not as simple as putting it in a vertical list and calling it a day.

And there are a few correlative studies that propose guns don't really make you safer. It's 'obvious' because it's not like there is any info missing here - more guns means more death by guns. If we look at other countries, like for example Canada, they aren't THAT different than the US in a lot of aspects, but look at a city like Toronto - we do our best to tackle our social issues and to reduce the amount of guns on the street, and there really is an anti-gun culture here - for our 6+million population, we had 75 homicides in 2011. I'm not saying I know -exactly- why that is, but it should be looked into, considered. You need to ask the sorts of questions like "maybe the fact that only 1% of the population owns a gun has a part to play in that, considering that 40% of all crimes committed with guns in the US originate from a legal purchase". I can go on and on, but there is a lot more that REALLY highlights why there are so many people who want to tackle gun culture alongside other social issues in the US.
 

GrizzNKev

Banned
I don't disagree with him about mass shootings, I think it's just irresponsible to say "Mass shootings are rare, therefore let's not worry about guns".

Gun violence occurs outside mass shootings, and guns are just one issue of a multifaceted issue that most likely explains exactly why violent crime is soooo high in the US compared to pretty much any other developed nation. You need to address gun culture, you need to address poverty and social nets, you need to address the effects of locking people up so easily (1/6th of people in the US in jail because of marijuanna related crimes, criminals much more likely to become reliant on the system or repeat crime in the US, disproportionately high amount of minorities in the system etc).

Tackling just ONE of these problems doesn't do the issue of violent crime justice, tackling them all is what will get you the best results.

I feel like he was also trying to limit the perspective to child safety. Then again he didn't get much of a chance to say anything, since they more or less brought him on the show in a failed attempt to humiliate him.
 
I don't disagree with him about mass shootings, I think it's just irresponsible to say "Mass shootings are rare, therefore let's not worry about guns".

I don't think the message was to "not worry about guns" but more that the idea that "guns are the problem" is missing the point if the end goal is greater public safety. The vast majority of gun owners in the US are not killing people with or without them. Just as the vast majority of people with aspergers are not killing people.

The implication that gun owners or people with aspergers are simply ticking time bombs is insulting as fuck and counterproductive.

If you're concerned about child safety, protecting them from gun massacres is really, really fucking low on the list of probable dangers.
 

Kastrioti

Persecution Complex
Penn coming in with some reason and truth. It's scary to think if he wasn't on that panel the whole audience would be clapping brainwash style "hur dur videogames are bad and violent", "hurr durr lets take 350 million guns off the streets".

Whenever debating someone, facts and logic will always prevail.

Wendy exposed Puffy and Ma$e's relationship.

Please do tell.
 

UrbanRats

Member
I feel like he was also trying to limit the perspective to child safety. Then again he didn't get much of a chance to say anything, since they more or less brought him on the show in a failed attempt to humiliate him.

He talked a lot, in those 10 minutes.
And he actually made his points pretty clear (mainly by raising his voice, unfortunately, but those seem to be the rules of the house), so not too shabby for him.
 

davepoobond

you can't put a price on sparks
I don't disagree with him about mass shootings, I think it's just irresponsible to say "Mass shootings are rare, therefore let's not worry about guns".

Gun violence occurs outside mass shootings, and guns are just one issue of a multifaceted issue that most likely explains exactly why violent crime is soooo high in the US compared to pretty much any other developed nation. You need to address gun culture, you need to address poverty and social nets, you need to address the effects of locking people up so easily (1/6th of people in the US in jail because of marijuanna related crimes, criminals much more likely to become reliant on the system or repeat crime in the US, disproportionately high amount of minorities in the system etc).

Tackling just ONE of these problems doesn't do the issue of violent crime justice, tackling them all is what will get you the best results.

Even within the realm of "gun violence" the amount of people dead by mass shootings is small compared to the rest of the people that die every year.

I don't know the exact numbers, but I'm sure that it is more than the 100 or so between the movie theater and Newtown. Those events are famous from this year, but what about the hundreds of people that are murdered every year?

You can't just "take it all on" because then you're left with ineffectual strategies for all of them.
 
I think Penn expected this and thought "Let's see if I can make it without hitting someone". The difference is all these women are running their mouths for the sake of it, saying the first thing that comes to mind and playing for the customary applause.

Penn is trying to use logic and actually formulate his ideas clearly while carefully explaining why he thinks that way.

The dumbest people are often the ones who never, EVER say "I dont know" about a topic, and would rather run their mouths anyway out of fear that staying quiet makes them look stupid.
 

Xdrive05

Member
Penn coming in with some reason and truth. It's scary to think if he wasn't on that panel the whole audience would be clapping brainwash style "hur dur videogames are bad and violent", "hurr durr lets take 350 million guns off the streets".

Whenever debating someone, facts and logic will always prevail.

Only to people who care about facts and logic. Rhetoric and charisma usually prevail. Consider the fanaticism of that crowd, whipped into that self-righteous frenzy. Penn didn't reach any significant number of them. And he was right (at least on the factual claims).

Bill Maher's audience is about as bad as it gets for host-fellatio. But this was worse.
 

Kinitari

Black Canada Mafia
Even within the realm of "gun violence" the amount of people dead by mass shootings is small compared to the rest of the people that die every year.

I'm not sure what you mean by this? When I brought up the realm of 'gun violence' I made it to highlight that gun violence encompasses much more than mass shootings.

I don't know the exact numbers, but I'm sure that it is more than the 100 or so between the movie theater and Newtown. Those events are famous from this year, but what about the hundreds of people that are murdered every year?

I think that using the mass shootings to jump into a discussion about violent crime in general isn't necessarily a bad idea. It's not like people who want gun control want it just to stop mass shootings, they want it to reduce homicides in general. There are over 10,000 intentional homicides per year in the US, where the killer uses a gun. Luckily this number is going down, and we need to keep working to continue that trend.

You can't just "take it all on" because then you're left with ineffectual strategies for all of them.

Who says? You think the US only has enough time, resources and social services to tackle one issue at a time? Do you think symptoms like violent crime are the result of only one issue, and not usually the result of many variables coming together? There isn't just one guy looking to fix all the problems in the US, there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions.
 

davepoobond

you can't put a price on sparks
I think that using the mass shootings to jump into a discussion about violent crime in general isn't necessarily a bad idea. It's not like people who want gun control want it just to stop mass shootings, they want it to reduce homicides in general.

most, if not all, of the discussion in this video was to stop mass shootings and keeping guns out of the hands of people who are "crazy" or have "mental issues."


Who says? You think the US only has enough time, resources and social services to tackle one issue at a time? Do you think symptoms like violent crime are the result of only one issue, and not usually the result of many variables coming together? There isn't just one guy looking to fix all the problems in the US, there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions.

no, not necessarily. but if what you were saying were absolutely the case we'd still have a competent space program and accessible mental health services and getting rid of our homeless problems.

the truth is that we don't and there is a finite amount of money and time to deal with "all of the issues." You have to pick and choose.
 

Alchemy

Member
Jillette seemed like the only person there that had any clue what was going on, everyone else was busy clapping and grandstanding.
 

Kinitari

Black Canada Mafia
most, if not all, of the discussion in this video was to stop mass shootings and keeping guns out of the hands of people who are "crazy" or have "mental issues."

I'm not sure how we've gotten to this point in the conversation, but I never once defended those ladies in the video, they're all pretty stupid. Maybe not the CNN girl, but the other two definitely. But I've already told you a couple of times I think that focusing on mass shootings is irresponsible - but I mean that for BOTH Penn and those ladies. Shootings, heck, violent crime in general is what needs to be focused on.

no, not necessarily. but if what you were saying were absolutely the case we'd still have a competent space program and accessible mental health services and getting rid of our homeless problems.

the truth is that we don't and there is a finite amount of money and time to deal with "all of the issues." You have to pick and choose.

I agree here - that you need to pick and choose, I guess what my point was, is that you should pick and choose the right things. My general proposals would be

1. Make private prisons illegal - it removes any opportunity for corruption and lobbying that might influence prison populations.

2. Decriminalize marijuanna - you'll reduce the amount of prisoners dramatically, and remove people from the perpetual prison cycle (or poverty) they get thrown into because of it.

3. Make efforts to encourage a more 'gun free' society, this... is complicated, and I wouldn't really know how to approach it. This is less realistic in the US (I think, I really don't know what it's like there) but I think there are plenty of anti-gun organizations in the US who are trying their best to do so.
 

Router

Hopsiah the Kanga-Jew
Also nice to see Penn get pissed off at people spreading misconceptions about mental health. The number of times over the past 2 weeks I have wanted to choke someone in the media for pulling that shit is huge.
 
All games are art, just like all paintings are art. Some are better than others and taste is subjective.
I agree and go by Scott "Understanding Comics" McCloud definition of "anything you do in your spare time as a means of expression" is art.

Router said:
Also nice to see Penn get pissed off at people spreading misconceptions about mental health. The number of times over the past 2 weeks I have wanted to choke someone in the media for pulling that shit is huge.
That was a completely repugnant thing for her to claim, but sadly has been all over the place in the wake of this.
 
1. Make private prisons illegal - it removes any opportunity for corruption and lobbying that might influence prison populations.

:lol
Really now. I guess corruption in public institutions is just unheard of?

2. Decriminalize marijuanna - you'll reduce the amount of prisoners dramatically, and remove people from the perpetual prison cycle (or poverty) they get thrown into because of it.

Yup, very obvious but the government doesn't seem to think the amount of prisoners we have is an issue.

3. Make efforts to encourage a more 'gun free' society, this... is complicated, and I wouldn't really know how to approach it. This is less realistic in the US (I think, I really don't know what it's like there) but I think there are plenty of anti-gun organizations in the US who are trying their best to do so.

It's really not like everyone is just walking around with guns everywhere in America. There are a lot of owned guns but they're stored away, only taken to ranges or hunting, etc.

If you were walking around randomly in most places and were told that guns had been eradicated (other than cops), you'd believe them at least on visual appearances in the vast majority of the country.
 

Fantastical

Death Prophet
"hurr durr lets take 350 million guns off the streets".

I think they just talked about banning assault weapons. This is gun control they're talking about, not gun elimination.

Not that I'm defending all of what they said, but Jillette is really the on that made it about guns in general. They referenced the video of Obama talking about closing loopholes and introducing legislation to ban the sale of assault weapons and then Gillette started talking about how pools are a bigger killer of children or something.

I just don't see Obama's stance as a very radical one.

EDIT: Also Sue Simmons sounded like an idiot in that Asperger's talk, and it's actually pretty disgusting she got so many claps on that. Penn called her out on her bullshit, and she's like "THAT'S NOT WHAT DID", when it's exactly what she did.
 

Paper Fox

Member
Oh god my ears, I actually had to turn the volume down twice because those women were so shrill.
Are all talk/panel shows like this? A convoluted mess where people have to yell over the top of one another to get their "point" across?
 

thetrin

Hail, peons, for I have come as ambassador from the great and bountiful Blueberry Butt Explosion
Having watched plenty of Penn and Teller's show Bullshit on Showtime, I figured this would be his stance. Can't help but agree with him.
 

Kinitari

Black Canada Mafia
:lol
Really now. I guess corruption in public institutions is just unheard of?

I guess 'any' is a bit unrealistic, but 'a lot' is more accurate. If I remember correctly, private prisons are usually also more likely to have mistreatment of inmates, lower quality infrastructure and no financial benefits to the state... so all in all, bad news.

Yup, very obvious but the government doesn't seem to think the amount of prisoners we have is an issue.
So people need to talk about it until it -is- something they think is an issue. It's happening right now, people are working to legalize it on a state-by state basis. I guess what I am saying is... do what you can to influence the government, as the government is an extension of you.

It's really not like everyone is just walking around with guns everywhere in America. There are a lot of owned guns but they're stored away, only taken to ranges or hunting, etc.

If you were walking around randomly in most places and were told that guns had been eradicated (other than cops), you'd believe them at least on visual appearances in the vast majority of the country.

Like I said, don't really know how it works - but the high rate of homicides (also accidental deaths/suicide) perpetrated by guns speaks for itself. There are a lot of guns in the US, and they do a lot of damage.
 
It woulda been a better talk show if Wendy O. Williams had had one.

It has become a meaningless label and an umbrella for morons to hide under when they're ashamed to admit they are a republican.

From the way some use the label, they're as bad as murder simulator makers!
 
It's Hollywood's fault kids aren't getting vaccinated? Jillette's no smarter than any of them, except maybe Williams.
You don't agree? He probably just met Hollywood as in media in general. A lot of people don't vaccinate their kids because of those ridiculous claims that vaccinations caused autism. Also some celebrity parents are the type who take a public stance on stuff like not vaccinating their kids, so maybe he meant that Hollywood types contribute to the common attitude of not valuing evidence and disregarding statistics.
 

thetrin

Hail, peons, for I have come as ambassador from the great and bountiful Blueberry Butt Explosion
It's nice to know that the average human being has such a fucking abysmal impression of what someone with asperger's is actually like.

"They don't have empathy, and they don't know what's right or wrong". Good lord woman, they're not ticking time bombs.

The awareness of mental health issues in this country is fucking shameful.
 

Dude Abides

Banned
Well, maybe not "Hollywood", but you do see people like Bill Maher or Jenny McCarthy take a very public, very uninformed stance on the issue.


You don't agree? He probably just met Hollywood as in media in general. A lot of people don't vaccinate their kids because of those ridiculous claims that vaccinations caused autism. Also some celebrity parents are the type who take a public stance on stuff like not vaccinating their kids, so maybe he meant that Hollywood types contribute to the common attitude of not valuing evidence and disregarding statistics.

And that's why people don't get their kids vaccinated? Because of Maher and McCarthy? Penn rightly lambasted the one lady for asserting a causal effect without evidence but he did exactly the same thing. If he's going to play high priest of empirical rigor he should practice what he preaches.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom