Cuntstable Macron back on duty.
Cuntstable Macron back on duty.
Cuntstable Macron back on duty.
Cuntstable Macron back on duty.
Yea Macron...we should really think how ruZZia feels...
Yea Macron...we should really think how ruZZia feels...
US empire strikes back: Russia takes the hits, China lives in fear
https://english.pravda.ru/opinion/151238-us_empire/
China lives in fear? Of what? Russia?US empire strikes back: Russia takes the hits, China lives in fear
https://english.pravda.ru/opinion/151238-us_empire/
The stereotypes really holding up in this war...The French really show they are Frenchwtf …
Cuntstable Macron back on duty.
I generally like France's post-WW2 stance of showing the middle finger to the US and doing its own thing, but this is not the time lmao
What I mean is for example not helping the US commit its war crimes, like the invasion of Iraq for example. They just have to make sure they don't go too far in the opposite direction (aka Russia). So far they've struck a good balance imo. Not like UK and Italy for example, who have been US lackeys for a long time now.It’s ‘own thing‘ has been entwining itself inexorably with Russia for years, so not sure the pointless middle finger to the US was worth it. France has never done its own thing. It’s a follower, never a leader. And now its ‘leader’ has to kowtow to Putin, thanks to his country’s pathetic mismanagement.
What I mean is for example not helping the US commit its war crimes, like the invasion of Iraq for example. They just have to make sure they don't go too far in the opposite direction (aka Russia). So far they've struck a good balance imo. Not like UK and Italy for example, who have been US lackeys for a long time now.
Macron is thinking of the end game. Giving weapons to Ukraine (which France has been doing too) will help Ukraine defend itself, but it won’t end the war. That will happen either with a treaty signed with Putin, or with a regime change in Russia. Either way, it requires to keep « fair » relationships with Russia, ie opposing the war without « humiliating » it. It’s much more complex than playing good guys versus bad guys.They just dig, and dig, and dig, and dig.
Cunt one his last election so should be in every position to match the commitments of the likes of the US and UK. Instead he wants to be seen as the peaceful hero in a war. Cunstable indeed.
Macron is thinking of the end game. Giving weapons to Ukraine (which France has been doing too) will help Ukraine defend itself, but it won’t end the war. That will happen either with a treaty signed with Putin, or with a regime change in Russia. Either way, it requires to keep « fair » relationships with Russia, ie opposing the war without « humiliating » it. It’s much more complex than playing good guys versus bad guys.
People being emotional about the war will think « Russia is bad so everything that hurts them is good », but that’s not a great way to handle things, like most of European history has taught us.
Macron is thinking of the end game. Giving weapons to Ukraine (which France has been doing too) will help Ukraine defend itself, but it won’t end the war. That will happen either with a treaty signed with Putin, or with a regime change in Russia. Either way, it requires to keep « fair » relationships with Russia, ie opposing the war without « humiliating » it. It’s much more complex than playing good guys versus bad guys.
People being emotional about the war will think « Russia is bad so everything that hurts them is good », but that’s not a great way to handle things, like most of European history has taught us.
Excuse me guy, but you're talking shit.Macron is thinking of the end game. Giving weapons to Ukraine (which France has been doing too) will help Ukraine defend itself, but it won’t end the war. That will happen either with a treaty signed with Putin, or with a regime change in Russia. Either way, it requires to keep « fair » relationships with Russia, ie opposing the war without « humiliating » it. It’s much more complex than playing good guys versus bad guys.
People being emotional about the war will think « Russia is bad so everything that hurts them is good », but that’s not a great way to handle things, like most of European history has taught us.
Excuse me guy, but you're talking shit.
Macron might be thinking of the end game, but he doesn't have a say in it. Ukraine and Russia are the only ones who can end this. Everyone else is just watching, waiting or helping. So he's planning for something he has no stake in...bollocks to him and anyone standing up for him
Weapons won't win the war? Every war ever fought in the history of mankind has been won with having more, or bigger weapons, that eventually force one side into submission. Send more weapons to Ukraine. Train them up on how to use them. Let them defend their homeland to the last man, if that's what Ukraine want to do. Fuck France if they think they have a say in that. They want relations with Russia, fine, but don't use Ukraine as an excuse or as a bargaining chip. Let them stand up and say they want cheap Russia gas again please Mr putin
And treaties? The last few treaties signed with Russia turned out real well didn't they?
Russian–Ukrainian Friendship Treaty:
agreement between Ukraine and Russia, signed in 1997, which fixed the principle of strategic partnership, the recognition of the inviolability of existing borders, and respect for territorial integrity and mutual commitment not to use its territory to harm the security of each other. The treaty prevents Ukraine and Russia from invading one another's country respectively, and declaring war
OR
Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances:
memorandum prohibited the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States from threatening or using military force or economic coercion against Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, "except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations" as long as Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons
Russia don't deserve the chance to sign treaties, and will likely never be fully trusted ever again.
Fuck Russia. Fuck France.
Long live Ukraine![]()
Ukraine is allowed, by international law, to determine who they deal with, when and how. Russia don't like that Ukraine have slowly started moving towards the west?in fairness to those Treaties they where signed when Ukraine was within Moscows sphere of influence, with it recently pivoting towards the West with a possibility of it joining the EU and eventually even Nato, in Putins eyes Ukraine ripped up the treaties and through em in the bin forcing big bad Putin's hand
i wholeheartedly agree, so what if Ukraine joins the EU/Nato that's there god given democratic right... but see it in the wider context of who your neighbour is.. a brutal authoritarian kleptocracy and that shit directly challenges their authority and we all know how wee man syndrome cunts actUkraine is allowed, by international law, to determine who they deal with, when and how. Russia don't like that Ukraine have slowly started moving towards the west?
Tough fucking titties. Deal with it. No action that Ukraine have taken, has given Russia the right to invade an independent sovereign country.
Fuck 'em and anyone standing up for them. In any way
Excuse me guy, but you're talking shit.
Macron might be thinking of the end game, but he doesn't have a say in it. Ukraine and Russia are the only ones who can end this. Everyone else is just watching, waiting or helping. So he's planning for something he has no stake in...bollocks to him and anyone standing up for him
Weapons won't win the war? Every war ever fought in the history of mankind has been won with having more, or bigger weapons, that eventually force one side into submission.
more weapons to Ukraine. Train them up on how to use them. Let them defend their homeland to the last man, if that's what Ukraine want to do.
And treaties? The last few treaties signed with Russia turned out real well didn't they?
Russia don't deserve the chance to sign treaties, and will likely never be fully trusted ever again.
And this is why diplomacy was invented.i wholeheartedly agree, so what if Ukraine joins the EU/Nato that's there god given democratic right... but see it in the wider context of who your neighbour is.. a brutal authoritarian kleptocracy and that shit directly challenges their authority and we all know how wee man syndrome cunts act
Did you not watch the first 100 days of this war? That's exactly what Russia tried to do. And failed.It’s one way of ending a war. Although forcing one side to submission usually means invading the country and occupying its capital city. Which isn’t currently the plan with Russia (and would have a high risk in triggering nuclear war)
And that is fully up to Ukraine. Not France. If Ukraine want the war to last 100 years, then I support them in that decision, as its theirs to makeNobody is against that kind of support and action. It’s necessary for Ukraine to keep existing against Russia. Only it will only make the war last, it won’t end it.
I don't have a plan. Know why? Because I have no say in it, not being the Russian leader, or part of the Russian people, the Ukrainian leader, or part of the Ukrainian people. I will however support whatever Ukraine decide to do. And if it comes to it, and things change, and Europe, and it's allies, are once again engaged in war by a dictator, then I will support Russia being wiped off the map if that is the planSo what’s your plan then, erase Russia from the map ? Or keep running a never ending war ?
Like it or not, Russia isn’t going anywhere (Putin will go one day though, but that depends on uncontrolled elements). If there is to be peace in Ukraine again, it will still be with that country at your border. (Which is almost word for word what Macron was saying when he was mentioning the lack of humiliation)
And this is why diplomacy was invented.
People don't have to like each other to have to deal with each other.
UK and France have been at war with each other countless times, and still to this day do not like each other really. But they get along. Because they have to.
Same with Germany and [insert any neighboring country] after WW2
UK and USA were deadly enemies
Any number of countries, especially in the last 1500 years of European history will show that enemies put up with, and co-exist with each other
Hitler was an absolute cunt, but at least he had the ball to wage war, allowing whomever to mutually declare war and fight it out properly. Putin is a sneaky shit hiding behind lies. And anyone supporting him, or sucking up to him, should be named and shamed for all history
I agree, but little over 100 days ago, I'd say that Russia's standing in the world was shaky, but stable, enough to be able to act in good faith with. They had diplomatic ties with the rest of the western world. They chose this course and everything that's come with it. They deserve every hurt that comes to themDiplomacy only works with countries that can be trusted, Russia was never a country that could be trusted, hell any authoritarian dictatorship is not to be trusted nor should it be tolerated in this day and age. France & Germany get along because of the EU and because they are both democratic countries, they may disagree with many things but i wouldn't say they disliked each other, we've all moved on with the world, Russia, China, Syria etc havent and are unable to as long as they rule over their populace with an iron fist and act the cunt on the world stage. I hope that even if there is a peace agreement between Ukraine & Russia that the West maintains the sanctions so long as Putin remains in power, as he will always be a threat to the world order.
So what’s your plan then, erase Russia from the map ?
If this was a war between Russia & NATO it would be an embarrassing massacre, at this point a single US carrier group parked off the coast of Odessa could single handily win this war which is both an alarming insight of the sheer lethality & strength of a carrier group and the utter ineptitude of the Russians...
Old ass malfunction subsRussia is very capable of nuking every nato state in seconds. I don't think things are going to be that easy. Their nuclear armed subs are lurking all over the place too.
it's not like putin have button to launch all nukes, if among putins generals there's ones who ready to die after when he manages to convince ones who responsible for proceeding multiple steps for launching nuke to get ready to die also then probability is higher but still there's unknowns because nukes works different then your casual "kalibr" rocket nuke is explosion within explosion there's must be precise explosion to trigger atomic reaction before nuke explodes, knowing that russia collection of nukes are a bit old many things could go wrong at technical level, but one thing i can guarantee after launching nuke there won't be left anything from the position where that nuke was launched nomatter it was launched from sub, silo or somewhere else.Russia is very capable of nuking every nato state in seconds. I don't think things are going to be that easy. Their nuclear armed subs are lurking all over the place too.
There are two problems with that approach:Macron is thinking of the end game. Giving weapons to Ukraine (which France has been doing too) will help Ukraine defend itself, but it won’t end the war. That will happen either with a treaty signed with Putin, or with a regime change in Russia. Either way, it requires to keep « fair » relationships with Russia, ie opposing the war without « humiliating » it. It’s much more complex than playing good guys versus bad guys.
People being emotional about the war will think « Russia is bad so everything that hurts them is good », but that’s not a great way to handle things, like most of European history has taught us.
As are NATO ones. Well, some members of NATO. With more than enough nuclear warheads to make starting a nuclear war very unappetising.Russia is very capable of nuking every nato state in seconds. I don't think things are going to be that easy. Their nuclear armed subs are lurking all over the place too.
It's almost like people don't study history. Humiliation is part of war. History was written by the victors as propaganda, to show how feeble the losing side was. Huge amounts of land gets stripped from countries. New borders forced upon them. Reparations expected and enforced. Hell, at some points in the far past the winners would literally take family and children as hostage to make sure there were no plans to come back at them.There are two problems with that approach:
1. Who decides what humiliates Russia...? oh, wait, Russia. So they'll try and do whatever they want.
2. Give the likes of Russia an inch and they'll take a mile.
Hitler was given 'off-ramps'. Didn't work. Stalin was. Didn't work. Mao was. Didn't work there either. Pol Pot? Nope.
The worst part is that if Ukraine gives any considerable concessions to Russia, then not only with this A-Okay this with Russia, it will send out the message that it's possible, even 'fine' for others to do the same. And there are a lot of people who are itching for a 'good' excuse to do so.It's almost like people don't study history. Humiliation is part of war. History was written by the victors as propaganda, to show how feeble the losing side was. Huge amounts of land gets stripped from countries. New borders forced upon them. Reparations expected and enforced. Hell, at some points in the far past the winners would literally take family and children as hostage to make sure there were no plans to come back at them.
I'm sorry if Macron doesn't want his little buddy to be humiliated, but fuck you, Russia deserve to be humiliated, and for it to be remembered for as long as humankind exists on this planet.
You dont get to invade a country, under any pretence, then level entire cities, Rape children, burn bodies and then have the absolute gall to say that it's actually Ukrainians doing it to themselves