• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Wkd BO 04•14-16•17 - Can't fight fate, Baby: F8 leaves WW B.O. opening record in dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
I want them to keep the idea but set it in the past. bring back Hugh Jackman as Van Helsing. make creature from black lagoon, mummy, wolf man etc. in the past. go super gothic with the look of it all.

and to make it sustainable reign in the budgets to 100 million or less. i love that they're making a monsters universe but setting it in present day is awful.
 

hirokazu

Member
Avatar 2 depends on if they bring back the real main character.

Oy7A3AJ.gif
This looks awesome.
 

GAMEPROFF

Banned
I want them to keep the idea but set it in the past. bring back Hugh Jackman as Van Helsing. make creature from black lagoon, mummy, wolf man etc. in the past. go super gothic with the look of it all.

and to make it sustainable reign in the budgets to 100 million or less. i love that they're making a monsters universe but setting it in present day is awful.
I agree 100%.
 
If it does, universal almost certainly cans the monster universe idea, right?

This is the second time they've tried to get the Monster Cinematic Universe off the ground Dracula Untold was first).

Avatar 2 depends on if they bring back the real main character.

Oy7A3AJ.gif

When your most interesting, compelling, and sympathetic character is the gung-ho military colonel who ticks off every cliche in the book as well as looks like a fit Donald Trump, you KNOW you fucked up bad.
 

Slayven

Member
Box Office GAF only does two things.

1. Crunch numbers
2. Throw stones at flops.




$140-150 feels about right.

Now is the time to see how much heat the Cruise Missile has. Luckily, he's got Mission Impossible 6 coming next year if it flops.
Boxoffice Gaf is the only thing keeping Kwiston's thirst for an Alpha Flight movie in check
Slayven responses seem to break the Bronson script as well. It doesn't know how to respond.

I am James T Kirk
 
A movie makes $150 million and counting and people are screaming bomb? Sure Jan.

If the movie cost $100-150 million, then making $150 million means it was not profitable for the studio. This is how movie finances work. It's not a mystery.

That is a bomb. Bombs don't get sequels.
 
If they did we'd be on our fourth Scott Pilgrim sequel by now.

Y'all getting stone cold in here.

---

To illustrate the situation to that other poster:

Get Out made $183 million, and it cost $4.5 million. Success.
Power Rangers made $128 million, but it cost $100 million to make. Flop.
John Wick 2 made $161 million, and it cost $40 million. Success.
A Cure of Wellness made $25 million, but it cost $40 million. Flop.
Resident Evil Final made $312 million on a budget of $40 million. Success.
The goddamn Bye Bye Man made only $24 million. It cost a scant $7.4 million to make, so... success. (WHY?)
The Great Wall barely made a profit with the napkin math, making $331 million on a budget of $150 million. Coasted over the hill. But, that doesn't count marketing spend, so... bomb.
Ghost in the Shell will probably end up at $200 million tops. It cost $110 million to make and that's only the production budget. $200 million does not make it profitable, therefore it flopped.

There is not some magic threshold where a studio doesn't make money on a film and it's somehow still a success.
 

Penguin

Member
Y'all getting stone cold in here.

---

To illustrate the situation to that other poster:

Get Out made $183 million, and it cost $4.5 million. Success.
Power Rangers made $128 million, but it cost $100 million to make. Flop.
John Wick 2 made $161 million, and it cost $40 million. Success.
A Cure of Wellness made $25 million, but it cost $40 million. Flop.
Resident Evil Final made $312 million on a budget of $40 million. Success.
The goddamn Bye Bye Man made only $24 million. It cost a scant $7.4 million to make, so... success. (WHY?)
The Great Wall barely made a profit with the napkin math, making $331 million on a budget of $150 million. Coasted over the hill. But, that doesn't count marketing spend, so... bomb.
Ghost in the Shell will probably end up at $200 million tops. It cost $110 million to make and that's only the production budget. $200 million does not make it profitable, therefore it flopped.

There is not some magic threshold where a studio doesn't make money on a film and it's somehow still a success.

I don't know, the way folks talk about BvS... it is the highest grossing bomb of all-time I believe!
 

jmdajr

Member
When your most interesting, compelling, and sympathetic character is the gung-ho military colonel who ticks off every cliche in the book as well as looks like a fit Donald Trump, you KNOW you fucked up bad.

The movie made 2 billion dollars

Anyhow, Congrats to Ghost in the Shell for being the highest grossing live action anime of all time!
 

Schlorgan

Member
Despite BvS being a financial success, it's still a financial disappointment relatively speaking given the two iconic brands attached to it.
It was also a disappointment considering that Warner set the whole thing up for that movie to make Avengers money, and it didn't.
 

gamz

Member
This is the second time they've tried to get the Monster Cinematic Universe off the ground Dracula Untold was first).



When your most interesting, compelling, and sympathetic character is the gung-ho military colonel who ticks off every cliche in the book as well as looks like a fit Donald Trump, you KNOW you fucked up bad.

Huh?
 

Busty

Banned

I'm going to make a totally and utterly baseless prediction that F8 will do a 'Godzilla' and plummet next weekend which will lead to a North American total less than the $238m that Fast 6 made, perhaps closer to the $209m that Fast5 made. International will still be huge so it won't make that much difference to the overall picture.

Ah, yes. Now, to bask in my glorious prediction until KSwiston comes in and blows it to pieces with facts.
 

One million ahead for TFA to retain the record!

Despite BvS being a financial success, it's still a financial disappointment relatively speaking given the two iconic brands attached to it.

Correct. As an example, if Fate of the Furious made $600 million worldwide, that is definitely a success, but it would also be a huge disappointment for Universal, given that previous entries did $1.5 billion and $788 million. Expectations are important.
 
Wow the Fast and the Furious franchise kills it overseas. I guess that's due to having cast representation from pretty much all parts of the world?
 
If F8 does less than F7 overall despite breaking the WW BO opening record, is it still a success?
Yes. The record is a scheduling thing. It would be insanely difficult to top F7 overall. And nobody expected it to.

The Last Jedi isn't going to make more than TFA either, but will still be a success.
 
If F8 does less than F7 overall despite breaking the WW BO opening record, is it still a success?

The expectation is that Paul Walker's death propelled Furious 7 to higher levels, so F8 is viewed as a course correction. Like I said, something like $600 million would be bad, I assume $850 million is around the "studio is really happy" level. High enough over 6 to show that the franchise still have forward momentum.

And as cartographer says, I'd think expectations for the Last Jedi are between Rogue One and The Force Awakens. $1.2 billion maybe? I'm just throwing out a number that feels right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom