HeWhoWalks
Gold Member
Do you see how their strategies are different? Simple question.I have nothing to add to your quips. Your tribalism is noted.
Do you see how their strategies are different? Simple question.I have nothing to add to your quips. Your tribalism is noted.
I really don’t have a point. I’m mostly a PS guy now so no matter what (it is where I buy my multiplatform games now), I will be able to enjoy the games no matter where they go. But it’s clear that Sony sees expanding to other platforms as a priority even though PS is their core. Shawn even stated it’s not financially feasible for Sony to keep up their AAA pace on releases and high game development costs.
Well, next year is IICON. We could have floor plan wars return.I already miss the console war. We need to be able to duke it out with an ironclad exclusive games list war. None of the gotdang who is expanding where bullshit.
![]()
Lol. I too, miss every faction listing their exclusives for battle.I already miss the console war. We need to be able to duke it out with an ironclad exclusive games list war. None of the gotdang who is expanding where bullshit.
![]()
Well, check out the Nintendo list of exclusives. It's a bloodbath. I have to admit, I do wish that games like Mario and Donkey Kong were on PS/Xbox in glorious 4K and 120fps.Lol. I too, miss every faction listing their exclusives for battle.
Yup, even the power war was more fun (the old school version of it, for course).Lol. I too, miss every faction listing their exclusives for battle.
This is made by AI, right? Its the image of Phil Spencer at 75-80 years old.![]()
“I’m tired boss”
I found it interesting during the direct showcase they showed PS5 as a platform for the games they announce. Meanwhile Playstation doesn't show Xbox as a platform for any of the same games being announced in their trailers.
They are having trouble keeping up with the generation leading Switch
You still mad at Sony going 3rd party? Your meltdown is publicly glorious. It’s ok. It’s good for gamers. Thank you Sony.
It will be ubiquitous," Yoshida said. "Wherever there is computing, users will be able to play their favorite games seamlessly. Why PlayStation will remain our core product [is] we will expand our gaming experiences to PC, mobile, and cloud."
"We know that for players, especially Xbox players, where we come from is people sitting in front of their television with a console plugged into their television. It's what developers are targeting. It's what so many of us play. Console is critical to the success of what we’re doing today and the future of Xbox. It's not the only thing we're going to focus on. We're going to focus on allowing player choice. But we know that console is the core of how people think- box is in the name of our product. Xbox. Console is critical to what we are building."
Oh this is one of those posts.![]()
This is made by AI, right? Its the image of Phil Spencer at 75-80 years old.
I wanted to check it for AI artefacts, but the image is not downloadable and only exists on a locked imgur account ("image does not exist"). As far as I can see.
So I made a visual search of the image, and turns out it was uploaded to reddit 3 years ago, and that original image on reddit carries the watermark for Face App. Which is a kind of an AI tool to edit images and fx make people look older or younger.
![]()
![]()
FaceApp - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Did you make it?
Who knew everything is so mundane with consolidation, that we would miss actual list wars.I already miss the console war. We need to be able to duke it out with an ironclad exclusive games list war. None of the gotdang who is expanding where bullshit.
![]()
I said SP games and you quoted HellDivers II, yeah I can see how on brand you can beYou moved the goal posts as expected…to the other side of the entire field![]()
I said SP games and you quoted HellDivers II, yeah I can see how on brand you can be. You posted live services games to back up your Sony is porting their SP games to multiple platforms and accuse others of moving the goalposts… sorry buddy. What a win
.
You are trying to drive a SonyToo narrative as if the moves by Sony and MS were comparable at this point in time.
You are comparing porting few months on releases
, non committing to any more exclusives for new games, etc… to MANY Sony Single Player titles to PC (not Xbox, but PC) by listing a short list of ports of old games remasters / remakes and then peppering them with GaaS / live services games… as your proof Sony was porting “many” SP games day and date on Xbox. More on brand with everything is an Xbox though, kudos.
Now you are making stuff up. Complains about goalpost moving by others and suddenly we went from “many SP games day and date on multiple platforms” to “what do you mean I did not post any SP games?”. Padding the list with live services multiplayer games showed how much in good faith you were arguing.I didn't post any single player day one games? Looking forward to this reply, "buddy"
Keeping on stretching things without proof (removing PSN requirements from PC games does not sell what you are pitching as manifest destiny either) and trying to move the argument away from the previous statement… ooook.I never said they are exactly the same at this point and time. MS is already all in. Sony is headed to all in.
As above, you are projecting or arguing in bad faith.You just moved the goal posts to an entirely new stadium.
There you go again. I assume you just prefer to troll? Enough of that please.Now you are making stuff up. Complains about goalpost moving by others and suddenly we went from “many SP games day and date on multiple platforms” to “what do you mean I did not post any SP games?”. Padding the list with live services multiplayer games showed how much in good faith you were arguing.
Letting aside the pro debater stretch of old games remaster being what people mean when they compare day and date multiplatform everywhere (with more asterisks about PC vs PC + PlayStation).
Keeping on stretching things without proof (removing PSN requirements from PC games does not sell what you are pitching as manifest destiny either) and trying to move the argument away from the previous statement… ooook.
As above, you are projecting or arguing in bad faith.
cloud console, cheap price, very profitable, not a problem if it fail. that's what gonna happenNow I ask this... Why the fuck are they even pushing for a new console? This makes no sense.
Lol you will have to live up to your name for a long-ass time my brother.That's all folks, it's officially a wrap. We now have 2 exclusive-heavy console manufacturers and everybody else is 3rd party.
Like I said in another thread though, this is all part of their long-term strategy. It's just a trojan horse for their real plan, which is to eventually make all their best games exclusive on Xbox in about 2 generations from now.
Right now they need to make the business model work, and they can only do that by being on PlayStation.
Once that 10-year COD contract is up, that franchise will be Xbox + PC exclusive, I'm almost 100% sure of that. The casuals who buy PS just for that, will switch to wherever the place is that has it.
Xbox made money?To make money?
Just replying to the argument you made as you made it, you were not arguing in good faith or projecting, but you are right maybe I am unfair and you are doing both.There you go again. I assume you just prefer to troll? Enough of that please.
If you can’t see how it’s not odd at all, then we are at a dead end.If you cannot see how odd the TLOU port is to your argument of Sony accelerating their PC day and date strategy not sure what to tell you.
If it sells at all.very profitable
I guess so, not that you are even bothering to explain that at all. How port of remasters of relatively old games to PC compares to new Xbox games ported to PlayStation and Switch (not contractually obligated years ago too, like the licence in MLB and I would not be surprised if it were for LEGO too)… pretending they are self evident…If you can’t see how it’s not odd at all, then we are at a dead end.
Shut it, snowflake!Oh this is one of those posts.
Your problem is you can't interpret their comment as they meant it, only as you want to define it to fit a narrative.
Putting some GAAS on Steam isn't "going 3P" in the way an EA or Capcom are. By that logic, Nintendo is a 3P too since they have a few offshoots on mobile. Companies like SIE and Nintendo dabble with a few 3P releases here and there, same as MS did when they had games like Minecraft on other platforms and Cuphead (eventually) as a multiplat, or even the Ori games. It's the volume & frequency of such ventures that determine whether a company's focused as a 1P platform holder or as a 3P multiplatform publisher, IMO.
I will say, SIE were getting in a bit of a bad habit with porting so many of their current-gen games over to PC, even if it was 1-2 years later or so. That's something I've consistently criticized them on, as have others, even some other shareholders. And going by some rumors, it seems SIE have realized that which is why they're going leaner on the PC initiative (probably until they feel they need their own storefront, which I think is many years away).
There's no reason for them to continue that strategy as they have the past couple of years because stuff like HD2 have probably shown them that it's really very specific games in their portfolio that resonate strongly with Steam audiences and they should likely prioritize those, so anything outside of that range either gets skipped or it only goes because it's super-legacy and not detracting from the value of their main commercial platform's library value for that generation cycle (i.e old PS3 games or older). That's why going forward at least from the internal studios, likely the only PC ports are going to be some of the GAAS, and probably double-down on Helldivers 2 growing that into a platform.
I don't think they'll be pushing PC ports of non-GAAS current-gen AAA or even most AA games any further because it's not really 'free money' like some call it (initial costs for PC versions have to be accounted for in upfront budgets rolled into dev costs for the console release; studios like Nixxes just finish up some end work, handle various optimization and build out the package for distribution), and that time & money for the port could go towards optimization for the console version or even new AA games of various sizes, bolstering their publishing pipeline in more meaningful ways.
Is this Phil from Yesterday or Phil from A Week Ago or Phil from A Month Ago or Phil from Six Months ago?
Because these are all very different Phils...
Well saidOh this is one of those posts.
Your problem is you can't interpret their comment as they meant it, only as you want to define it to fit a narrative.
Putting some GAAS on Steam isn't "going 3P" in the way an EA or Capcom are. By that logic, Nintendo is a 3P too since they have a few offshoots on mobile. Companies like SIE and Nintendo dabble with a few 3P releases here and there, same as MS did when they had games like Minecraft on other platforms and Cuphead (eventually) as a multiplat, or even the Ori games. It's the volume & frequency of such ventures that determine whether a company's focused as a 1P platform holder or as a 3P multiplatform publisher, IMO.
I will say, SIE were getting in a bit of a bad habit with porting so many of their current-gen games over to PC, even if it was 1-2 years later or so. That's something I've consistently criticized them on, as have others, even some other shareholders. And going by some rumors, it seems SIE have realized that which is why they're going leaner on the PC initiative (probably until they feel they need their own storefront, which I think is many years away).
There's no reason for them to continue that strategy as they have the past couple of years because stuff like HD2 have probably shown them that it's really very specific games in their portfolio that resonate strongly with Steam audiences and they should likely prioritize those, so anything outside of that range either gets skipped or it only goes because it's super-legacy and not detracting from the value of their main commercial platform's library value for that generation cycle (i.e old PS3 games or older). That's why going forward at least from the internal studios, likely the only PC ports are going to be some of the GAAS, and probably double-down on Helldivers 2 growing that into a platform.
I don't think they'll be pushing PC ports of non-GAAS current-gen AAA or even most AA games any further because it's not really 'free money' like some call it (initial costs for PC versions have to be accounted for in upfront budgets rolled into dev costs for the console release; studios like Nixxes just finish up some end work, handle various optimization and build out the package for distribution), and that time & money for the port could go towards optimization for the console version or even new AA games of various sizes, bolstering their publishing pipeline in more meaningful ways.
Is this Phil from Yesterday or Phil from A Week Ago or Phil from A Month Ago or Phil from Six Months ago?
Because these are all very different Phils...
It already is based on COD sales from last year, can't remember the split, but it was crazyOf course they will. PS5 is going to be their main money-maker for the next several years.
Well it’s good PS at least has games from Xbox.It already is based on COD sales from last year, can't remember the split, but it was crazy
Say hello to MS Gaming, the new Third Party Publisher for Sony, PCMR and Nintendo
Rough with the kind of astroturfers and toxic influencers Xbox partnered with.God that is rough for Xbox fans.
Sony has games, what's lacking is First Party Exclusive Games, but that's because head of PS is a dumbass who think everyone loves Horizon and GAAS trash, so he likes to burn money on that shit while PS5 is coasting the gen since it has no competitionWell it’s good PS at least has games from Xbox.![]()
Sony are fickle, and it could all change at the drop of a hat as nothing is tying them down to the PC platform. They don’t own the OS or even a store.I never said they are exactly the same at this point and time. MS is already all in. Sony is headed to all in.
If the next Xbox dominates the high end console gaming space, which seems very possible, don't be surprised if it starts receiving PlayStation ports.Well it’s good PS at least has games from Xbox.![]()
The next Xbox is a PC.If the next Xbox dominates the high end console gaming space, which seems very possible, don't be surprised if it starts receiving PlayStation ports.
It's going to be spectacular.The next Xbox is a PC.
Nobody will need to do Xbox ports anymore.
It’ll just work!
Not much difference to what PS already gets honestly. Great entry point for Xbox fans to the PC world however.It's going to be spectacular.
But rest assured it will be in the form of a console and there will be envious looks from PS fans. PC level performance with the accessibility of a console? That's going to ruffle feathers.
It’s gonna need the Xbox OS to run the existing libraries.Not much difference to what PS already gets honestly. Great entry point for Xbox fans to the PC world however.
It’d be easier to give them the PC version and emulate anything else. Most games already work across both.It’s gonna need the Xbox OS to run the existing libraries.
Hard to imagine my 800 Xbox 360, Xbox OG, Xbox One and Xbox Series games would just work on a PC. Especially if there isn’t a PC version. Users would have a flawless experience with Halo 5 and Halo Infinite? One is on PC the other is not.It’d be easier to give them the PC version and emulate anything else. Most games already work across both.
It’d be easier to give them the PC version and emulate anything else. Most games already work across both.
That's all folks, it's officially a wrap. We now have 2 exclusive-heavy console manufacturers and everybody else is 3rd party.
Like I said in another thread though, this is all part of their long-term strategy. It's just a trojan horse for their real plan, which is to eventually make all their best games exclusive on Xbox in about 2 generations from now.
Right now they need to make the business model work, and they can only do that by being on PlayStation.
Once that 10-year COD contract is up, that franchise will be Xbox + PC exclusive, I'm almost 100% sure of that. The casuals who buy PS just for that, will switch to wherever the place is that has it.
If the next Xbox dominates the high end console gaming space, which seems very possible