"My wife taking my name doesn't make her less than me, but it is absolutely essential that she does because my family name must continue on and I'm not really concerned about her's continuing on."
"My wife taking my name doesn't make her less than me, but it is absolutely essential that she does because my family name must continue on and I'm not really concerned about her's continuing on."
Patriarchal society/casual sexism rears its head again.
Why are you and other posters ITT so insistent on projecting your view of how marriage and the person they choose to marry should feel about their decisions they make in said marriage?
Where does this insecurity from others wanting to simply have or want their partner to have a last name change come from?
If they find a person who agrees with their idea of marriage and agree upon the same decisions, why do you find issue with it? I don't think I've seen one poster who wants their partner to have a last name change say "yes and ALL marriages should be like that as well" but some of the responses you guys are giving are hostile as fuck.
How old are you?
Honestly, no I wouldn't be OK with that. I'm admittedly old fashioned when it comes to the name thing. The two hyphenated last names is as about as far as I'd be ok with. Again, that's just for me personally. If two other people don't care, and still want to get married, good for them.
Read the first word from my response to your quote. I said "nope" I don't think it's pointless. Asking why you'd still get married doesn't mean I think it's pointless.
Honestly, no I wouldn't be OK with that. I'm admittedly old fashioned when it comes to the name thing. The two hyphenated last names is as about as far as I'd be ok with. Again, that's just for me personally. If two other people don't care, and still want to get married, good for them.
"Old fashioned" in this case means sexist, just to be clear.
Why are you and other posters ITT so insistent on projecting your view of how marriage and the person they choose to marry should feel about their decisions they make in said marriage?
Where does this insecurity from others wanting to simply have or want their partner to have a last name change come from?
If they find a person who agrees with their idea of marriage and agree upon the same decisions, why do you find issue with it? I don't think I've seen one poster who wants their partner to have a last name change say "yes and ALL marriages should be like that as well" but some of the responses you guys are giving are hostile as fuck.
No, we don't have kids. We don't plan on having any. He's part of a big family, though. His brother is married with two sons. They all have his last name.Depends. Do you want to have children? If so, is there no one else in his family to carry on the name? If I was in that situation it might matter.
Oh give me a break. Wanting her to take your last name is not fucking sexist. Christ.
Replace "requiring changing last name" with "requiring they be of the same race". We still cool with it? Just saying "Oh it's just how I feel about it" doesn't change the fact that it is a gross attitude. It speaks to your character. If people want to do it, fine. But to say that it is essential that they do so is gross.
Replace "requiring changing last name" with "requiring they be of the same race".
Oh give me a break. Wanting her to take your last name is not fucking sexist. Christ.
It does if you claim to be "old-fashioned".30, not that it should matter.
holy slippery slope, dude
these things aren't even comparable in the slightest
Oh give me a break. Wanting her to take your last name is not fucking sexist. Christ.
"Wanting women, who you've known for maybe 10% of their life, to abandon their family name that they've held for their entire life because it is important for the man's family name, and only the man's family name, to continue on is NOT sexist guys!"
It absolutely is. You want her to take her name because you want a "family" name but you are not willing to take her name.
That is 100% sexist.
"Wanting women, who you've known for maybe 10% of their life, to abandon their family name that they've held for their entire life because it is important for the man's family name, and only the man's family name, to continue on is NOT sexist guys!"
You seem to keep ignoring where I said, many times over, that I'm completely Ok with her keeping her last name and having it hyphenated.
Read the first word from my response to your quote. I said "nope" I don't think it's pointless. Asking why you'd still get married doesn't mean I think it's pointless.
Too late buddy, you're literally Hitler now.
No that's hypocrite.
You seem to keep ignoring where I said, many times over, that I'm completely Ok with her keeping her last name and having it hyphenated.
Agreed. I don't think it's an inherently backwards tradition, but of course nobody should be forced to change their name when marrying.I think the only thing that matters is that both partners get a say, and there's discussion and compromise.
There's nothing wrong with taking another person's name, if that's what is decided. The problem is people taking a hard line in the sand on it because they believe they have some sort of right that is granted to them via tradition, and try to impose that on someone else.
If a man marries a woman and she lovingly takes his last name, that's wonderful. If she begrudgingly gives up her family name because he wouldn't take no for an answer, that's incredibly sad.
When somebody says "why even do X", it is saying doing X is pointless. Just because you contradict yourself by denying what you said doesn't mean you said it is pointless.
You seem to keep ignoring where I said, many times over, that I'm completely Ok with her keeping her last name and having it hyphenated.
Too late buddy, you're literally Hitler now.
Apparently. lol
I'd prefer if she kept her name.. it's fucking creepy like some 1950's shit.
"Hubby, let's invite the Cranston's over.."
Barf. Ya, nope.
That's still absolutely sexist. If she did that would you also take the hyphenated name?
Of course you wouldn't.
They aren't mutually exclusive. It's both sexist and hypocritical. Sexist men are often quite hypocritical.
Honestly most old fashioned marriage traditions still boil down to "I own this woman".
I wouldn't? Fascinating. Please tell me more about myself.
Feel free to deny it.
No it's not. That's just how you're taking an inquiry. That's on you, bud. Not me. I asked, a question, you answered it, and I see your point of view. That's not thinking something is worthless.