oldergamer
Member
Pretty sure i called this months back. Its a patented ms developed feature.
Rumors redeemed
DF redeemed
And of course GitHub was redeemed
Crow, anyone?
Me 2, I even rock a brick GB, fun doesn’t need TF.I still rock my psx!
I can't blame them since they don't have any amazing games to talk about.Nothing has changed. Xbox fans misinterpreting information as usual.
That's fucking gross as all get out.No, it should be like this or it's not next gen.
![]()
![]()
Sure bud? Sounds more like you are misinterpreting infoNothing has changed. Xbox fans misinterpreting information as usual.
Sure bud? Sounds more like you are misinterpreting info
is confirmed from the first official ps5 teardown video that the soc have the same internal code amd used for Oberon (github leak). now (today) is confirmed by ms that the xbox is the only full rdna2 console.Github was already confirmed to be old data
Where is confirmation that VRS will not be included?
is confirmed from the first official ps5 teardown video that the soc have the same internal code amd used for Oberon (github leak). now (today) is confirmed by ms that the xbox is the only full rdna2 console.
by the size of the ps5 and the high (but variable ) and unusual (for a console) clock...by the number of the cu's ...well....honestly It is easy to conclude that the ps5 is probably the leak console then clocked higher
It said it was RDNA 1. PS5 is confirmed to be RNDA 2 based.
The Github leak said 2000GHz, but its 2.23Ghz
Oberon has gone through revisions.
The leak was old.
Ftfy
in fact as cerny said ..they was testing 2ghz but they could not sustain them constantly .....the soc is basically that one clocked high adding the variable clock part ....sony confirmed is BASED on rdna 2 ....today amd presented the architecture and only talked about xbox...and then ms said officially that is the only FULL rdna 2 next gen console.It said it was RDNA 1. PS5 is confirmed to be RNDA 2.
The Github leak said 2000GHz, but its 2.23Ghz
Oberon has gone through revisions.
The leak was old.
PS5 is confirmed to be RNDA 2.
Ms confirmed PS5 is not full RDNA2? Well there it is folks, wrap it up.As the italian developer of the PS5 said, it's not full RDNA 2.
MS today just confirmed it.
As the italian developer of the PS5 said, it's not full RDNA 2.
MS today just confirmed it.
Didn’t Cerny say that they discarded RDNA2 features that are useless for consoles? So, what are you concerned about?in fact as cerny said ..they was testing 2ghz but they could not sustain them constantly .....the soc is basically that one clocked high adding the variable clock part ....sony confirmed is BASED on rdna 2 ....today amd presented the architecture and only talked about xbox...and then ms said officially that is the only FULL rdna 2 next gen console.
in fact as cerny said ..they was testing 2ghz but they could not sustain them constantly .....the soc is basically that one clocked high adding the variable clock part ....sony confirmed is BASED on rdna 2 ....today amd presented the architecture and only talked about xbox...and then ms said officially that is the only FULL rdna 2 next gen console.
Running a GPU at 2GHZ was looking like an unreachable target with the old fixed frequency strategy. With this NEW paradigm, we're able to run way over that - in fact we have to cap the GPU frequency at 2.23GHz so that we can guarantee that the on chip logic operates properly.
They are reading the official statement.I don't know why you guys try so hard to ignore facts.
Sony can’t catch a break
They are reading the official statement.
Didn’t Cerny say that they discarded RDNA2 features that are useless for consoles? So, what are you concerned about?
They are reading the official statement.
it only confirm that they added the variable part to the oberon (github) soc. I mean doesn't that frequency sound strange to you? the amd code on the soc? the size of the console? and that at today's presentation amd spoke only of ms? Ms would not say / or post that is the ONLY full rdna2 next gen console if it wasn't (lots of legal stuff would happen ). cerny after all, must also sell the console. and everything scream at the github nowDo you realize that what Mark Cerny said confirms it was OLD?
This was after he talked about the benefits of AMD Smartshift.
Yes, they talked about Xbox because it shares a lot of features on their desktop GPU.
AMD is confirmed that PS5 is RDNA 2.
I don't know why you guys try so hard to ignore facts.
it only confirm that they added the variable part to the oberon (github) soc. I mean doesn't that frequency sound strange to you? the size of the console? and that at today's presentation and spoke only of ms? Ms would not say / or post that is the ONLY full rdna2 next gen console if it wasn't (lots of legal stuff would happen )
ps5 is not full rdna 2 either is not hard to understand.IT says RDNA 1.
PS5 is not RDNA 1.
Why is this so difficult to understand.
It was not added on top. PS5 is RDNA 2.
i am worried because at this point it seems that the ps5 was planned to come out in 2019 with the famous 9 tf. And I'm afraid that the famous variable clock if it works like the smartshift it does not bring these expected benefits
ps5 is not full rdna 2 either is not hard to understand.
in fact we have to wait for df comparation but as right now it dosnt sound promisingYou don't understand all this technical mumbo jumbo, focus on games and features.
If one console doesn't have VRS, it means they chose another similar custom solution, not that it will imply a meaningful performance difference.
The difference between both platforms will be negligible, as Ubi choices on PS5/XSX games already show : basically reconstructed 4K / 60 fps everywhere (or nearly every game) and on both platforms the same.
If every Ubi game runs the same on both platforms as it seems, it will be the same for every multiplatform games.
what false info? sorry you seem triggered and I did not want thisIt doesn't need to if those missing features are only from MS.
You can't even answer the question because you know you're going based off of assumptions and false info.
I just asked you if PS5 is RDNA 1 and you didn't answer.what false info? sorry you seem triggered and I did not want this
And didn't MS say they waited until all RDNA2 features were completed before finalizing their GPU? If that's the case Sony couldn't have omitted/included them because they finalized their hardware earlier.
Right, the XBox Series X doesn't have any games for the next 7 years and therefore the whole next generation!poor Sony, I don't think you have to worry about them, I've heard they have this crazy thing that a few people like with a console called games.
poor Sony, I don't think you have to worry about them, I've heard they have this crazy thing that a few people like with a console called games.
Must have been preloaded in there. Sorry about that.Erm, you quoted me, but the quote wasn't something I said? It was DForce's comment.
The statement suggests it is missing features and it is official. You will understand why they aren't paying attention to you.They're reading an official statement where it says PS5 will not have VRS?
If you are a PlayStation Fanboy than it doesn't matter.Does this matter? Someone tell me what to think.
AMD's logo is on that tweet too. Are they co-signing?Ms confirmed PS5 is not full RDNA2? Well there it is folks, wrap it up.
It is not and it is not rdna 2 ...as the ps5 graphic engineer said is a mix of bothI just asked you if PS5 is RDNA 1 and you didn't answer.
I also asked you if features such as VRS wasn't confirmed.
I think you don't like the fact that I'm asking you for evidence to prove your claim.
Ms confirmed PS5 is not full RDNA2? Well there it is folks, wrap it up.
Must have been preloaded in there. Sorry about that.
The statement suggests it is missing features and it is official. You will understand why they aren't paying attention to you.
You seem to be in full console warrior mode. The vrs thing has been a while coming with the Sony engineer having a tantrum on twitter about it early on. Not hard to see why people would suspect it first thing.
Does this matter? Someone tell me what to think.
geometry engine is not the same thing ..it replaces what should be rdna2's mesh shaders. also the RT will be different .. the sp5 has the intersection engine a different solution from rdna2. it remains to understand the vrs .. and above all the ml(which unfortunately seems to have no hw about it)Ps5 uses its own Geometry engine not mesh shading. This has been know for months, as has VRS.
Fidelity FX (VRS is part)
![]()
Some reference users (Guerilla)
![]()
Wrap it up, VRS is common, it was in RDNA1 but did not work correctly.
But keep going, amusing.
It is not and it is not rdna 2 ...as the ps5 graphic engineer said is a mix of both
geometry engine is not the same thing ..it replaces what should be rdna2's mesh shaders. also the RT will be different .. the sp5 has the intersection engine a different solution from rdna2. it remains to understand the vrs .. and above all the ml(which unfortunately seems to have no hw about it)