Shadow Hog
Member
Honestly, as much as I think EA deserves a high spot on here, I'm not sure they deserve highest over Bank of America.
I look forward to another snarky press release.Voted EA purely because their push-back against this stuff has been so hilariously bad.
Don't forget people if you vote for EA it is because you are secretly against LGBT rights.
Don't be obtuse. That wasn't what they implied.
EA worst than Bank of America? Please, Bank of America has ruined fucking lives. I wouldn't even humor voting for EA over Bank of America.
People(read: angry nerds/geeks) on the internet don't care. They don't like what a video game company did and that makes them much worst than anything else in the real world.
Hell, if there was a vote between who was the worst "leader" in the world between the old EA CEO(forgot his name) and Kim Jong-Un, the old EA CEO would win.
Our fight with Bank of America (who foreclosed on our house illegally) to keep our house cost us over $17,000. We're getting $250 back in a settlement. FUCK Bank of America.
Remind me why Monsanto isn't winning this every year...
Actually that was what they implied, they implied people were perfectly happy with the way EA does things and it is thanks to "right wing" websites encouraging people to vote for EA on their LGBT stance that they are winning worse company in America.
I did my part, I voted for EA.
Don't be obtuse. That wasn't what they implied.
I could name a dozen companies worse than EA.
But I couldn't name a videogame company worse than EA.
Activision
.
Ugh.
Not even close.
Ok that's fucked up. Is it too late to change my vote?Our fight with Bank of America (who foreclosed on our house illegally) to keep our house cost us over $17,000. We're getting $250 back in a settlement. FUCK Bank of America.
I was being facetious about the Activision comment. If they poll shows anything, it's how geared the gaming community is at trying to make EA look as bad as possible. It's childish.
Hell, if there was a vote between who was the worst "leader" in the world between the old EA CEO(forgot his name) and Kim Jong-Un, the old EA CEO would win.
The poll means nothing, what do you care?
One reason the poll means nothing is because people don't actually vote on who is the worst. If truly awful companies were being picked then the awareness of their hurtful policies could be raised and maybe there would be some sort of movement to get something changed. But when people view the results and see a video game publisher, they know the entire thing is meaningless/a joke and it gets ignored by both the general public and the companies on the list.
Damnit you gave me a heart attack.
![]()
Making me do a double take there. Thought we had some Bioshock Infinite craziness going on for a second.
lol
If only that's how things really worked.
I voted for BoA without a second thought when they went up and that anecdote just sealed it (and makes anyone supporting EA winning in this thread still look like a colossal asshole.) But I'd only have really struggled with Inbev, and I'd probably go with EA more because they seem to be in a position to outright wreck their industry whereas anyone can start a micro brewery, and Inbev HAS gotten the government's attention so if they go too far they'll be broken up I'd hope, though that does kind of make the statement they ARE worse. Everyone else has been much more of a problem to me, and I half wonder if EA may eventually end up destroying themselves anyway.The fact that any of you can still cheer for EA after someone in this thread recounted losing their house illegally to the practices of BoA is... less surprising than I would have hoped.
What the ever loving hell?They're not even in the list of nominees, sadly. Or yeah I'd imagine they'd have a good shot at it.
Don't forget people if you vote for EA it is because you are secretly against LGBT rights.
Why precisely?What the ever loving hell?
I'm going to nominate them next year so that this oversight is fixed.
I've only scratched the surface of Monsanto's bullshit, but they're absolutely worthy of being on there. The only problem I suppose is that they don't sell to consumers directly but to other corporations.Why precisely?
The fact that any of you can still cheer for EA after someone in this thread recounted losing their house illegally to the practices of BoA is... less surprising than I would have hoped.