• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

GeForce RTX 5090 is $1,999 5080 $999 5070 Ti $749 5070 $549 (Availability Starting Jan 30 for RTX 5090 and 5080)

Big Al

Neo Member
28 FPS standing still and no combat

Snl Season 47 GIF by Saturday Night Live
At this woeful rate in PC gaming it would be more cost effective to have a film crew do a choose your own adventure game. At least it's real frames and not this fake bullshit.

In no world idoes this AI generated garbage cut the mustard.
 

Bojji

Member
Bought a 4080 super not to long ago

Ffffffffffffffffffff

I’m fine
I’m fine

Remember 2080ti users that got it for 1200$ and when Ampere launched 3070 was matching it for 500$?

Or 3090ti users that had to pay 2k dollars and few months later 4090 launched for 1600 and destroyed it?

Compared to that it's nothing, lol.
 
Last edited:

scydrex

Member



Oof! Wake me up when we get to the 6090. 28fps at native 4K isn’t the jump I expect for a $2000 GPU. 5090 will be amazing with DLSS but I expect more of raw performance increase between card generations. Hopefully I see that real increase when we get to the 6090 and 7090 which is when I’ll be ready to upgrade my 4090.



According to that video a 4090 4k native max settings and RT runs at 25fps. So the 5090 runs at 28fps and the 4090 runs at 25fps on the same settings? So without the DLSS 4 or Framegen the raw performance sucks?
 
Last edited:



Oof! Wake me up when we get to the 6090. 28fps at native 4K isn’t the jump I expect for a $2000 GPU. 5090 will be amazing with DLSS but I expect more of raw performance increase between card generations. Hopefully I see that real increase when we get to the 6090 and 7090 which is when I’ll be ready to upgrade my 4090.

I was expecting a lot more to be honest. I thought the RTX5090 would at least double the performance of my RTX4080S at 4K native + PT and get around 40fps, and especially since this is a RT/PT game where we should see much bigger gains due to the 2x faster RT cores.

I guess we will have to wait for the official benchmarks and see the full range of games that have been tested to find out just how fast the RTX5090 really is.

b1-Win64-Shipping-2025-01-07-23-21-18-487.jpg



As time goes on the 4090 looks more and more like the 1080Ti successor.

You need a good baseline performance for frame gen to feel passable. Imagine going from 28fps to 224 frame gen. Might as well play this on the Switch 2.
On gamepad anything above 35fps already feel passable to me with Nvidia FGx2. With M+K I need a base of 50 fps to have a good experience.
 
Last edited:
Best Buy starting to show some prebuilds that are coming

HsvsgFN.png
These are surprisingly reasonable prices.




According to that video a 4090 4k native max settings and RT runs at 25fps. So the 5090 runs at 28fps and the 4090 runs at 25fps on the same settings? So without the DLSS 4 or Framegen the raw performance sucks?

Wow, only a 3fps increase with raw performance? This is worse than I thought 💀
 
Last edited:

Kilau

Gold Member
I’m just excited to be getting an xx90 card finally, I can’t wait to list my ownership in every post I make. Next I’ll buy an OLED TV.
 

Three

Member


According to that video a 4090 4k native max settings and RT runs at 25fps. So the 5090 runs at 28fps and the 4090 runs at 25fps on the same settings? So without the DLSS 4 or Framegen the raw performance sucks?

Just 12% faster for $2000. The fact that they used multi framegen 4x mode to show relative performance charts/stats for this card doesn't fill me with confidence but I'll hold out for real benchmarks later on.
 

Bojji

Member
And following the COVID prices, shortages, and its 8GB of VRAM, 2080 Ti owners had the last laugh.

I remember flood of used 2080ti's. Almost none of those suckers got 3080 for months...

I was able to get 3070 very close to MSRP in the meantime, hahaha.
 
Last edited:
It doesnt matter how good the frame generation is: at 28 fps you are getting the input lag of a 28 fps game despite it showing you 200+ fps
While that's true, it's not what's happening on the video, the game's going from 28 FPS to around 60-80 with DLSS Performance which is what they showed the games with, and then using FGen to 220ish.

In that case the input lag is from a 60-70? FPS game, worse on GPU limited games IIRC, but then Reflex 2 does it's thing, not sure about the final result, but judging by DF's video, probably around 50-60ms input lag? (tho not sure if Reflex 2 was being used in that case).

For comparisons with a "similar" game, God of War at 60 FPS on PS5 has 110 ms input lag, and 47ms on PC (40ms at 120 FPS)
 
Last edited:

Bojji

Member
I think the biggest thing coming from all these announcements is that ALL Dlss games will be able to be upgraded to the new high quality version and for all Nvidia GPUs.

This shit is massive. Dlss is already better than any other reconstruction and that transformer version is one step above.
 

analog_future

Resident Crybaby
I’ve been dead set for like a year on getting the 5090, but the more I think about it after the reveal, the more I’m leaning towards just keeping my 4090.

Very minimal gains in raster performance and the 4xxx cards are gaining all of the DLSS 4 stuff except for 4x Frame Gen. Being able to sell the 4090 for a huge chunk of the cost helps, but still not sure if it’s worth it to me.

Glad I have a few weeks to think on it.
 

raduque

Member
Just wait till they will announce 8GB 5060...
I honestly thought the 5070 would be 8gb and the Ti would be 12...

These cards are just too expensive. I was considering the 7700xt 12gb for ~$350, but maybe I can get a used 4070 for $300 or a Ti for $350.
 

cripterion

Member
The 5070 is 108 000¥ here WTF, I'm tired of Japan price gouging. It's definitely not 549$

I have no GPU so I'll be looking at the 5000 series but fuck Japan and their deluxe pricing on everything.
 

StereoVsn

Gold Member
I honestly thought the 5070 would be 8gb and the Ti would be 12...

These cards are just too expensive. I was considering the 7700xt 12gb for ~$350, but maybe I can get a used 4070 for $300 or a Ti for $350.
Wait to see what 9070XT offers first. But yeah, I can see bunch of 4000 series cards heading to eBay and other used marketplaces.

A 4070 Super wouldn’t be a bad get at all.
 

HogIsland

Member
I could be sold on a 5080, but there's no game I really need to flex it. Other than that Marvel 1943 game, what's coming out next year that could really be early next gen on a powerful PC? My 6700XT is keeping up for now.
 

kiphalfton

Member
Wait till raster results come. I'm not even sure I wanna get a 5070ti anyone because they're results are from DLSS performance, they didn't even bother with quality let alone balanced. Wait till the dust settles

I remember when the 970 traded blows with a 780 Ti. That was pure raster performance, baby! For half the price.

Not this marketing bulll crap they're coming up with now.
 

Puscifer

Member
I remember when the 970 traded blows with a 780 Ti. That was pure raster performance, baby! For half the price.

Not this marketing bulll crap they're coming up with now.
Seriously, now that the dust has settled in in wait and see territory and so should everyone else. This is clown shit
 

Celcius

°Temp. member

MSI-RTX5090-SPECIAL-EDITIOn-2.jpg


Kinda taking the flow-through design of the FE a step further... 3 fans on the bottom and then on the top you have a fan on each end with the PCB in the middle (5 fans in total)


The Asus Astral has 4 fans (3 on the bottom, one on the top)

introducing-asus-geforce-rtx-50-series-graphics-cards-v0-dk3npdakmibe1.png
 
Last edited:

proandrad

Member
As time goes on the 4090 looks more and more like the 1080Ti successor.

You need a good baseline performance for frame gen to feel passable. Imagine going from 28fps to 224 frame gen. Might as well play this on the Switch 2.
This is really disingenuous, it isn't 28 to 224 via frame gen. Its 28 to probably 60-120fps with dlss upscaling and then frame gen gets added.
 

peish

Member
arch3.jpg
Looking back at 4090 schematic, the tensor cores are as big as cuda cores

Wonder how Nvidia is able to go from 1.3k AI tops to 3.3k AI. Unless something sneaky with FP4 vs. FP8?

 

The Cockatrice

I'm retarded?
I think the biggest thing coming from all these announcements is that ALL Dlss games will be able to be upgraded to the new high quality version and for all Nvidia GPUs.

This shit is massive. Dlss is already better than any other reconstruction and that transformer version is one step above.

I wonder if it'll work for games that are too lazy to update their DLSS versions and we can use the swapper or just drop the new one and replace it.
 

TrippleA345

Member
arch3.jpg
Looking back at 4090 schematic, the tensor cores are as big as cuda cores

Wonder how Nvidia is able to go from 1.3k AI tops to 3.3k AI. Unless something sneaky with FP4 vs. FP8?


Above picture is just an illustration.
Look at the picture
https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe5de4636-a2e6-4ddd-bb46-a53f3a85ff8c_2237x2560.jpeg
, the tensor cores are not specifically highlighted here, but they are very small in each GPU core, only an extremely tiny amount of chip area was used. If the tensor cores are to be made physically larger, the result is that they are still extremely small.
 

peish

Member
Above picture is just an illustration.
Look at the picture
https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe5de4636-a2e6-4ddd-bb46-a53f3a85ff8c_2237x2560.jpeg
, the tensor cores are not specifically highlighted here, but they are very small in each GPU core, only an extremely tiny amount of chip area was used. If the tensor cores are to be made physically larger, the result is that they are still extremely small.

Interesting find, I guess the tensor cores are blue colored? Didn’t this locuza have an account here
 

Elios83

Member



The increase in raw power sucks but at this point it's expected.
The silicon technology is at its limits, it's not possible anymore to double performance by using double the amount of transistors on a more advanced node while keeping costs and die size the same.
It's just incremental stuff.
AI and ray tracing/path tracing are the only fields where R&D can lead to significant perceived improvements.

Still of course pretending that AI interpolated frames are the same thing as actually rendered frames to make the cards look good it's pure PR bullshit.
 
I wonder if it'll work for games that are too lazy to update their DLSS versions and we can use the swapper or just drop the new one and replace it.
That's the whole point, you can now forcefully update the DLSS version of a game without the lazy devs doing anything

There are already 3rd party tools which can do this for you, it's a simple swap of the dll file. This just makes it official in the Nvidia App, and also presumably will not trip the anti-cheats in some multiplayer games which the 3rd party tools will
 

TrippleA345

Member
Interesting find, I guess the tensor cores are blue colored? Didn’t this locuza have an account here
No, the blue thing is something else, here in this picture you can see the tensor core. The yellow dots are for illustration purposes only. They could be that small. Possibly even much much smaller
oS2uJhU.png
 
Top Bottom