What an overrated port...
When were ports not allowed to be well received?
I wonder if Jim Sterling will review this. He gave Mario Kart 7 a 5.
When were ports not allowed to be well received?
When were they not allowed to be overrated?
When were they not allowed to be overrated?
How so?
Is it out of the question that some people might think this port is overrated?
Is it THAT ludicrous of an idea?
LOL giving that, while giving Call of Duty MW3 a free pass for whatever issue he had with MK 7 is why i never take him seriously. I never understand why people look up to him. I see him as a contrarian.
Ah, never can tell in some of these threads.I was joking.
5/10 for Mario Kart 7 isn't really contrarian given that the game had baffling omissions and was overall a safe retread of MKDS with nothing exciting going for it.
When were ports not allowed to be well received?
No i didn't say anything about that.
i am asking how is it overrated. It is a simple question.
5/10 is incredibly low for such a great game as MK7, but reviews aren't formulas. They're feelings, and Jim has every right to hold inconsistent metrics as long as he articulates his feelings in a comprehensible way.Yet look at MW3. Same problems. Retread of past COD games with nothing exciting or anything to choose over past COD games. 9/10
I think it's odd that a game could improve and as a result get a lower score.I will say I can't think of any remasters, or even remakes for that matter, that scored higher than the original release, let alone this much higher. It's a little odd.
I will say I can't think of any remasters, or even remakes for that matter, that scored higher than the original release, let alone this much higher. It's a little odd.
Is it out of the question that some people might think this port is overrated?
Is it THAT ludicrous of an idea?
I will say I can't think of any remasters, or even remakes for that matter, that scored higher than the original release, let alone this much higher. It's a little odd.
5/10 is incredibly low for such a great game as MK7, but reviews aren't formulas. They're feelings, and Jim has every right to hold inconsistent metrics as long as he articulates his feelings in a comprehensible way.
Thinking the game is overrated is fine.Is it out of the question that some people might think this port is overrated?
Is it THAT ludicrous of an idea?
I think it's odd that a game could improve and as a result get a lower score.
I think what people cant get their mind around is
Mario kart 8 gets an 88 and its remaster goes up 6 points to 94
While other games, for example, TLOU gets a 95 and its remaster stays a 95.
Both have comparable addidtions to their remasters.
Though they are different genres one could argue tlou is a more complete package too offering substantial SP and MP vs. mk's MP focus
Yup. If a game gets improved in the remaster and then gets a lower score it means the original game was overrated and the reviewer did a bad job reviewing the original. Any game that was "a good game for the time" is not a good game at all and never was.I just don't jive with the logic that if a game's a port it's exempt from getting 9s and 10s. I think the additional content and sheer quality of the game in general explain why it's getting such high marks.
Perhaps it's more of an indictment of the WiiU, and how shitty a console it was, that it held back a game from getting a better score when it originally release.
When were they not allowed to be overrated?
Then again I think Splatoon 2 is a sequel and not a port but people think I'm crazy for that one too~
I think what people cant get their mind around is
Mario kart 8 gets an 88 and its remaster goes up 6 points to 94
While other games, for example, TLOU gets a 95 and its remaster stays a 95.
Both have comparable addidtions to their remasters.
Though they are different genres one could argue tlou is a more complete package too offering substantial SP and MP vs. mk's MP focus
Perhaps it's more of an indictment of the WiiU, and how shitty a console it was, that it held back a game from getting a better score when it originally release.
I think what people cant get their mind around is
Mario kart 8 gets an 88 and its remaster goes up 6 points to 94
While other games, for example, TLOU gets a 95 and its remaster stays a 95.
Both have comparable addidtions to their remasters.
Though they are different genres one could argue tlou is a more complete package too offering substantial SP and MP vs. mk's MP focus
my friends all have switches so we'll likely end up playing multiplayer on handheld so we have our own screensSo how do people plan on playing local multiplayer with this game?
Separate Pro Controllers?
Separated Joy cons?
Joy con pairs for each player?
I think what people cant get their mind around is
Mario kart 8 gets an 88 and its remaster goes up 6 points to 94
While other games, for example, TLOU gets a 95 and its remaster stays a 95.
Both have comparable addidtions to their remasters.
Though they are different genres one could argue tlou is a more complete package too offering substantial SP and MP vs. mk's MP focus
Yeah you are really misusing the word overrated. You keep admitting to MK8 being a great game, and this is all of that "great game" plus all of the DLC, 16 new tracks, three new battle modes, new characters.. by definition it is quantitatively better than MK8.I already said why I feel it's overrated.
This isn't a new Mario Kart. This is MORE MK8. This Switch port... is overrated. The game is 3 years old.. some DLC 3 years later doesn't do shit for me.
So, as I said... the game is not a 94 game in my opinion. I think 88 is a great score for it.
Hence.. I think it's overrated.
People want MK9 or a discounted price instead of paying $60 for MK8D.Why the MK8D score salt?
So when is Polygon going to update the chart?
I need to know from them if Mario Kart 8 Deluxe is going to be the worst selling Mario Kart game of all time.
I think you missed my point entirely. Also i didnt say i cared about review scores., im explaining why other people in this thread are talking about them.Mario Kart 8 at 88 is underrated. The best arcade racer of all time is easily in the 95s if you care about scores and shit. Reviewers seem to have realized that, which explains the higher reviews.
Yeah you are really misusing the word overrated. You keep admitting to MK8 being a great game, and this is all of that "great game" plus all of the DLC, 16 new tracks, three new battle modes, new characters.. by definition it is quantitatively better than MK8.
Now obviously you don't seem to have interest in "more MK8", but if you take a widely regarded great game, and add stuff making it better... it is objectively impossible to be overrated.. even "IMHO".
All of the reasons you have point to why your interest is lowered,, but literally none of them point out why the game is overrated. Mario Kart 8 plus more stuff and better battle modes and arenas is a better Mario Kart 8. Squabbling over 2-6 points isn't any sort of proof of being overrated.
So how do people plan on playing local multiplayer with this game?
Separate Pro Controllers?
Separated Joy cons?
Joy con pairs for each player?
OMG... lol
Do YOU know what overrated means? I quite clearly think that MK8 Deluxe is overrated. I think the PORT is scoring higher than it deserves.
There's really no arguing that I think that. You don't get to decide what I think is overrated or not. It doesn't mean I have the definition wrong!
I feel the game scoring an 88 is fair. I think being a point or 2 better is fine.. I think being 6 points higher.. is overrated. Very simple.
No. Mario Kart 8 WiiU was underrated if anything, lol.
It's super unfortunate when games don't sell any copies except to the original install base.
???