I know it's been said, but I don't understand what the problem is with pointing out to your investors that you're better reviewed than your competitors. The only issue I have is with the article, which aside from being written in a very unprofessional and juvenile way, directs readers to learn why Metacritic is just bad mkay to other articles in the site which consist of nothing but platitudes and reasons that have little to do with consumer interests (namely, company practices of assigning bonuses, etc. based on it).
This just reeks of a anti-Metacritic agenda, and the knee-jerk reactions in this thread might be better served with a bit of reflection on whether or not Metacritic is the ultimate evil indeed, or rather just a tool that can be used and misused like any other.