• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Russia begins Invasion of Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.

FunkMiller

Banned
it could mean hardship and poverty for them if they don't get that gas

Honestly? Tough shit.

Countries like Greece underwent severe economic hardship and austerity during the Euro crisis at the behest of Germany. Germany and Austria could, and should, undergo the same hardships in order to spike Putin’s war machine.

They would survive. Yes, with heavily weakened economies, but that’s the price you pay for cozying up to Putin. A price they don’t want to pay, no matter how many lives it could potentially save.
 
Last edited:

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
Honestly? Tough shit.

Countries like Greece underwent severe economic hardship and austerity during the Euro crisis at the behest of Germany. Germany and Austria could, and should, undergo the same hardships in order to spike Putin’s war machine.

They would survive. Yes, with heavily weakened economies, but that’s the price you pay for cozying up to Putin. A price they don’t want to pay, no matter how many lives it could potentially save.
but why?
Why do they have to care?
The amount of economic crysis that could start would not be equal to "we showed dem russians haha! stick that fuel up your ass".
It's not worth it probably especially for a country that does not care.
 

FunkMiller

Banned
but why?
Why do they have to care?
The amount of economic crysis that could start would not be equal to "we showed dem russians haha! stick that fuel up your ass".
It's not worth it probably especially for a country that does not care.

Why do they have to care?

It’s not worth it??

People are being slaughtered in Ukraine. Are you seriously suggesting that Germany and Austria, given their dark histories, shouldn’t care about that?
 

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
Why do they have to care?

It’s not worth it??

People are being slaughtered in Ukraine. Are you seriously suggesting that Germany and Austria, given their dark histories, shouldn’t care about that?
That's naive thinking.
After all what is most important is to care for your own citizens and no gas would most likely ruin their livelyhood.
So there is no logical reason to cut of the gas sadly. You don't destroy your own economics just for the principle. At least not without other gas source
 

MastaKiiLA

Member
I don't want to downplay this but fuel is really important to countries without other means of getting it.
it could mean hardship and poverty for them if they don't get that gas
I have to agree with this. While it's easy for us to take hardline stances based on morals and values, running a country involves a lot of moving parts. There has to be cost-benefit analysis conducted in these situations, as cruel as that might sound. If fuel sanctions end up disrupting your economy to the point that it compromises your ability to defend yourself from the threat you're sanctioning, then you've only made Russia's job easier. I know that's an oversimplification, but it's important to note the calculus involved with these decisions. I don't envy any of the people having to make these decisions. It's largely lose-lose.
 

FunkMiller

Banned
I have to agree with this. While it's easy for us to take hardline stances based on morals and values, running a country involves a lot of moving parts. There has to be cost-benefit analysis conducted in these situations, as cruel as that might sound. If fuel sanctions end up disrupting your economy to the point that it compromises your ability to defend yourself from the threat you're sanctioning, then you've only made Russia's job easier. I know that's an oversimplification, but it's important to note the calculus involved with these decisions. I don't envy any of the people having to make these decisions. It's largely lose-lose.

In none of the analyses I’ve read regarding Germany’s ongoing multibillion contribution to Russia’s war effort, have I read anything to suggest that cutting off the gas would result in Germany’s defence being threatened. They are part of NATO, remember.

Further, I haven’t read any analysis that suggests stopping gas from Russia would result in any physical harm coming to the people of Germany.

The only reason they won’t do it is because it will affect the German economy.
 

FunkMiller

Banned
That's naive thinking.
After all what is most important is to care for your own citizens and no gas would most likely ruin their livelyhood.
So there is no logical reason to cut of the gas sadly. You don't destroy your own economics just for the principle. At least not without other gas source

Well okay. You don’t seem to be defending Germany’s moral stance on this, so I guess there’s no argument.

Money is more important than lives, I get it.
 

Artoris

Gold Member
I don't think stopping buying their gas/oil would hurt them much as they can sell it to China and India producing a lot more oil and gas would lower their price and that would hurt them
 

Patrick S.

Banned
The only reason they won’t do it is because it will affect the German economy.

And by extension, the economy of Europe and the whole world. Germany is the biggest money giver in Europe. Every time a bag of rice falls over in Vietnam we immediately send a billion that way, while our own infrastructure is in decay and the average Hans can't afford his groceries and gas anymore. I don't support Scholz's stubborn blocking of delivery of heavy weapons, but overall, I don't think we aren't doing a fucking lot, be it in Ukraine or wherever else.
 

Patrick S.

Banned
Money is more important than lives, I get it.

It's not just "money". It's our government's number one mandate to do what's best for our own country, same as every other government out there, and if that doesn't line up with your worldview I guess you'll have to deal with it.
 

Dr.D00p

Member
It's our government's number one mandate to do what's best for our own country, same as every other government out there, and if that doesn't line up with your worldview I guess you'll have to deal with it.

Good job the UK didn't think like that in 1939, eh?

I mean, We could have just left Continental Europe to the Nazis and kept on running our global Empire, minding our own business not paying much attention to what was going on, just 20 miles across the English Channel.

..but some of us can see the bigger picture.

Instead we risked everything, our very survival as a nation, fought on alone, ended up bankrupting ourselves doing it and lost the biggest Empire in history.

but hey, gotta love that 'mandate to do whats best for our country' line.
 

Patrick S.

Banned
Good job the UK didn't think like that in 1939, eh?

I mean, We could have just left Continental Europe to the Nazis and kept on running our global Empire, minding our own business not paying much attention to what was going on, just 20 miles across the English Channel.

..but some of us can see the bigger picture.

Instead we risked everything, our very survival as a nation, fought on alone, ended up bankrupting ourselves doing it and lost the biggest Empire in history.

but hey, gotta love that 'mandate to do whats best for our country' line.

Yeah Germany is doing absolutely zero to help in Ukraine bud
 
It's not just "money". It's our government's number one mandate to do what's best for our own country, same as every other government out there, and if that doesn't line up with your worldview I guess you'll have to deal with it.

Then it has failed already. If Germany's priority was its citizens then it wouldn't have put all its energy eggs in one basket, to the point that should something happen to it the entire citizenry should suffer. So if it has already failed to protect its citizens it can and will continue to do so.
 

Patrick S.

Banned
Then it has failed already. If Germany's priority was its citizens then it wouldn't have put all its energy eggs in one basket, to the point that should something happen to it the entire citizenry should suffer. So if it has already failed to protect its citizens it can and will continue to do so.

Sadly I have to agree with this.
 

Patrick S.

Banned
Germany is doing the absolute minimum, in order to (still) play both sides of the fence.

So sorry the Ukrainians didn't do what the German leadership hoped for..a quick war, a quick Russian victory, Urakainan acceptance and back to business as usual.

Most inconvenient.
Sure man
 

FunkMiller

Banned
It's not just "money". It's our government's number one mandate to do what's best for our own country, same as every other government out there, and if that doesn't line up with your worldview I guess you'll have to deal with it.

Yeah, you keep doing what’s best for your country over the lives of millions of Ukrainians. I’m sure that’ll look great in years to come, when the history books are written about the kinds of war atrocities Germany once vowed to never allow again.
 
Last edited:

tommolb

Member
It's not just "money". It's our government's number one mandate to do what's best for our own country, same as every other government out there, and if that doesn't line up with your worldview I guess you'll have to deal with it.
I somehow doubt a Russian victory/conquest of Ukraine is best for Germany.
 

Wildebeest

Member
And by extension, the economy of Europe and the whole world. Germany is the biggest money giver in Europe. Every time a bag of rice falls over in Vietnam we immediately send a billion that way, while our own infrastructure is in decay and the average Hans can't afford his groceries and gas anymore. I don't support Scholz's stubborn blocking of delivery of heavy weapons, but overall, I don't think we aren't doing a fucking lot, be it in Ukraine or wherever else.
This inflation is happening everywhere and is not particularly worse in Germany. In Turkey, Sri Lanka and North Africa there will be many more problems. The best way for the German government to reduce this pressure is to get this Ukraine shit done with as fast as possible. Sadly for Germany, it would not be globally acceptable for them to have their first wish of ending it quickly, which is Ukrainians surrendering totally. Which we now know involves a genocide of Ukrainian nationalists by a Russian military occupation, so they don't resist a puppet government. Fewer people want to buy cars and high-end medical equipment from a nation that openly supports genocide. I hope this explains the economic situation of Germany in a way that is cold and rational enough for you.
 
Last edited:

Oberstein

Member
Blinken and Austin will visit Ukraine on Sunday

Can you imagine Biden in Kiev?

6dnv2r.gif
 

Doczu

Member
I don't want to downplay this but fuel is really important to countries without other means of getting it.
it could mean hardship and poverty for them if they don't get that gas
I am all for diversifying Polands fuels and gas imports, but saying "ban it right now" would mean a lot of people would be fucked with heating their homes.
I would be one of them 😐

Edit: and thst would playing right into Putins hand. People would tske it to the streets and further destabilize the country
 
Last edited:

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
I am all for diversifying Polands fuels and gas imports, but saying "ban it right now" would mean a lot of people would be fucked with heating their homes.
I would be one of them 😐
exactly.
My poor old grandparents are using Coal to heat their home and the price of coal SKYROCETED.
1ton is now about 500$.... and it was 200$ just last year.
I chimed in 500$ yesterday(grandma resisted like a champ but lost!) ... and that's like 1/3rd of my paycheck.... and it's only 1 ton of coal while you need 5 tons for the whole winter.
So things are already very bad and it's not even really bad yet.
 
Last edited:
I somehow doubt a Russian victory/conquest of Ukraine is best for Germany.

Not Ukraine as a whole but a quick carving and annexation of separatist regions absolutely is. That allows Germany to preserve its status quo with Russia and gives more opportunity to take capitalistic and political advantage of the rest of Ukraine as it tries to rebuild. That's the cake and eat it liberal economy dream, regardless of Ukrainian sovereignty or citizens rights.
 

Doczu

Member
exactly.
My poor old grandparents are using Coal to heat their home and the price of coal SKYROCETED.
1ton is now about 500$.... and it was 200$ just last year.
I chimed in 500$ yesterday(grandma resisted like a champ but lost!) ... and that's like 1/3rd of my paycheck.... and it's only 1 ton of coal while you need 5 tons for the whole winter.
So things are already very bad and it's not even really bad yet.
Same here. Polish coal market got tsken over by russian coal and the price also doubled to around 400-500 per ton. My mother was lucky she bought coal just after the last heating season, so she paid the old price. But next year will be difficult for her, as she aint got a lot of cash. I'd love to help, but inflation, higher mortgage and (of course!) doubled gas prices hit me hard... And i've got it quite good, a lot of people here can't say that...
 

Bitmap Frogs

Mr. Community
Good job the UK didn't think like that in 1939, eh?

I mean, We could have just left Continental Europe to the Nazis and kept on running our global Empire.

I mean, Hitler dreamed of world domination which means eventually both Germany and Britain would clash. Arguably the smarter decision was to join the allies, rather than wait for a full strength reich to cross the Channel.

Besides, if you look at historical events, Britain always dreaded a unified Europe due to the danger it would posses, and specifically the idea of both german and france being under the same umbrella was anathema.

I'm not an expert on british history by any means, so I might be wrong on this/probably wrong, but I don't think the possibility of britain sitting it out while the nazis unified europe was ever a thing.
 

Wildebeest

Member
I mean, Hitler dreamed of world domination which means eventually both Germany and Britain would clash. Arguably the smarter decision was to join the allies, rather than wait for a full strength reich to cross the Channel.

Besides, if you look at historical events, Britain always dreaded a unified Europe due to the danger it would posses, and specifically the idea of both german and france being under the same umbrella was anathema.

I'm not an expert on british history by any means, so I might be wrong on this/probably wrong, but I don't think the possibility of britain sitting it out while the nazis unified europe was ever a thing.
Oh boy. This is idea of "perfidious Albion" secretly playing all the European nations against each other and then stabbing their friends in the back is actually something of a slur, used by fascist governments among others. Britain has a long history of interaction with Europe, but a long time before WW2, and up to that war, one of the major strategic concerns was being able to protect the very profitable sea access to India.

Around the time of the Napoleonic wars, the control of India and its trade was considered much more important than the US colonies, for example. That was a time when the British were backing coalition after coalition against the French Empire.

But the historic union of nations which bothered London so much, before Napoleon's empire, was France and Spain, not France and Germany, because France and Spain sent a huge "armada" fleet to invade. That was largely due to political and religious upheaval in Europe, not because Britain feared a strong united Europe.
 
Last edited:
I mean, Hitler dreamed of world domination which means eventually both Germany and Britain would clash. Arguably the smarter decision was to join the allies, rather than wait for a full strength reich to cross the Channel.

Besides, if you look at historical events, Britain always dreaded a unified Europe due to the danger it would posses, and specifically the idea of both german and france being under the same umbrella was anathema.

I'm not an expert on british history by any means, so I might be wrong on this/probably wrong, but I don't think the possibility of britain sitting it out while the nazis unified europe was ever a thing.

Of the permanent members of the post WW1 League of Nations, Britain was the only country that didn't join or roll over to the Axis. It wasn't that Britain joined the Allies, it was the only one left.

The idea that Britain dreaded a unified Europe is not born from history, it was a founding member of a number of organisations that sought to unify it. So no idea what "historical events" you are talking about, unless you mean some EU Brexit propaganda shit from the last 10 years.
 

Tams

Member
So Mariupol has finally fallen.

Source? I don't see it anywhere. If you don't have one, then don't just throw that out there.

Now, if you meant effectively fallen from a pure strategic point of view, then fair enough, but be more precise with your language.

I mean, Hitler dreamed of world domination which means eventually both Germany and Britain would clash. Arguably the smarter decision was to join the allies, rather than wait for a full strength reich to cross the Channel.

Besides, if you look at historical events, Britain always dreaded a unified Europe due to the danger it would posses, and specifically the idea of both german and france being under the same umbrella was anathema.

I'm not an expert on british history by any means, so I might be wrong on this/probably wrong, but I don't think the possibility of britain sitting it out while the nazis unified europe was ever a thing.
Lol, there never was the risk of a unified Europe then, and the UK didn't dread it. Wildebeest Wildebeest has laid that out in more detail.

To add to that, Hitler didn't seem (because this is alternative history) to want to invade Britain. He seemed to be open to an alliance, and it's not like there weren't quite a few sympathisers to that in the UK (many had spent the 20s and even 30s playing/messing around in Germany).

That's not to say the UK's choice to stand up to Nazi Germany was necessarily mainly altruistic (although, yes, the UK did see itself as a defender of democracy and freedom, and upholder of treaties). While a Nazi Europe (not really unified as there would have been the same old grudges still there) wouldn't have really been a threat to the UK herself, it would likely have ended up being one to the British Empire, and that was a concern.
 
Last edited:
Sadly they still have, the worst is that they will use fewer precision ones which will cause more casualties



This is my daily Fuck Putler
 
Last edited:
exactly.
My poor old grandparents are using Coal to heat their home and the price of coal SKYROCETED.
1ton is now about 500$.... and it was 200$ just last year.
I chimed in 500$ yesterday(grandma resisted like a champ but lost!) ... and that's like 1/3rd of my paycheck.... and it's only 1 ton of coal while you need 5 tons for the whole winter.
So things are already very bad and it's not even really bad yet.

Nah, let them freeze. Screw your poor grandparents, they probably deserve it anyway... What's more important is that we can satisfy the useless self-righteous reductive virtue signaling from a couple of obsessive posters on a video-game forum.
F*ck Europe and let's cripple it to the point of becoming completely unable to act or provide any kind of help, that will certainly show Putin.

Forget about the complexities and intricacies of geopolitical power balance, only black & white thinking allowed here! Kinda sad how some people use this tragedy to stroke their own ego.
Donating some cash apparently gives you the right to put yourself on a pedestal.

/s
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom