• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Russia begins Invasion of Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wildebeest

Member
I think it is good to let Russia know that Ukraine is getting support for their artillery because it might make Russia more hesitant to dig in with their artillery and shell civilians.
 

FunkMiller

Banned
I don't pretend to know if Ukraine will be able to hold out against Russia.

If you go take a look at old uncle Sun Tzu (which anyone who wants to understand warfare really should) you’ll see that Russia is pretty much doing the exact opposite of everything he says.

This rather indicates to me that provided Ukraine is given enough weaponry that they know how to use, they are going to win. Not without horrific cost, however.
 

RJMacready73

Simps for Amouranth
Here's another opinion from a former US military commander.


being an armchair follower of this war id agree with his assessment, Russia's failed attempt to take the North simply showed how utterly incompetent their army was in every facet, this renewed phase will be no different and with more and more heavy weapons heading to Ukraine they'll be able to bomb the shit out of the Russian front line outside the range of their artillery and with superior SAM support to protect them, sooner or later the morale of the Russians simply sent to the front to be cannon fodder will collapse and the whole operation will implode, its just a pity Nato is reluctant to get directly involved otherwise the whole thing would be over within the week
 

Wildebeest

Member
If you go take a look at old uncle Sun Tzu (which anyone who wants to understand warfare really should) you’ll see that Russia is pretty much doing the exact opposite of everything he says.

This rather indicates to me that provided Ukraine is given enough weaponry that they know how to use, they are going to win. Not without horrific cost, however.
I think Putin read the part in Sun Tzu about killing people as an example to make others follow your orders, then didn't think he needed to know more.

The ideas that people were using from the start to say that Russia couldn't win were more from Clausewitz, I think. Clausewitz was famous for integrating thoughts about the political situations of countries in military strategy. Like, the fact that Ukrainians were so willing to fight meant that it would be almost impossible to outright defeat them. Clausewitz made the argument that war was not symmetric because defenders had a much stronger will to fight on than attackers.
 

Kremlin again threatens the world with blows for assistance to Ukraine "If someone wants to interfere in the situation in Ukraine from outside and create a threat of a strategic nature, the blows will be lightning-fast".​


renderTimingPixel.png

t.me/Tsapli...


Putin warned that any countries meddling in Ukraine would be met with a swift response​

renderTimingPixel.png

bbc.com/news/l...


All I can see:

Emotion Reaction GIF
 

Makoto-Yuki

Gold Member
so putin wants to attack the UK? hahahahahahahahahaha

Russia will be wiped off the face of the earth if he tries it. He's a pathetic little coward and his army is struggling against Ukraine. Attack the UK and we will turn up along with France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Iceland, Poland, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Netherlands, Canada, United States, etc.

we'll see how that works out for you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Romulus

Member
so putin wants to attack the UK? hahahahahahahahahaha

Russia will be wiped off the face of the earth if he tries it. He's a pathetic little coward and his army is struggling against Ukraine. Attack the UK and we will turn up along with France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Iceland, Poland, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Netherlands, Canada, United States, etc.

we'll see how that works out for you.


A few US submarines would be enough.
 
D

Deleted member 1159

Unconfirmed Member
It’s nuclear war or nothing, and nuclear war is suicide. The only real questions are how suicidal is Putin and who will stand up to him if he tries it.
 
D

Deleted member 1159

Unconfirmed Member
Or he could fully mobilize
If he tries and keeps it to conventional warfare, that would also be suicide. The inept and rotten carcass that is the Russian army has been exposed to the world. If they didn’t have nukes they’d be annihilated in weeks.
 
I think it is good to let Russia know that Ukraine is getting support for their artillery because it might make Russia more hesitant to dig in with their artillery and shell civilians.
According to militar specialists, the number of artillery received by Ukraine could filll up to 7 battalions. So this denotes that their original artillery was completely wiped out by Russia. I am not sure about that tough, doesn’t seem easy to find more concrete information.
 
Last edited:

sinnergy

Member
If he tries and keeps it to conventional warfare, that would also be suicide. The inept and rotten carcass that is the Russian army has been exposed to the world. If they didn’t have nukes they’d be annihilated in weeks.
Yup. I bet most of his nukes won’t even launch 🤣
 

IDKFA

I am Become Bilbo Baggins
It’s nuclear war or nothing, and nuclear war is suicide. The only real questions are how suicidal is Putin and who will stand up to him if he tries it.

I'd like to think that the people in Putin's inner circle will see the insanity of nuclear war and put an end to him.
 
D

Deleted member 1159

Unconfirmed Member
Yup. I bet most of his nukes won’t even launch 🤣
A small percentage of thousands would be enough…
I'd like to think that the people in Putin's inner circle will see the insanity of nuclear war and put an end to him.
Honestly, we can only hope this is the case…which isn’t great when being wrong means a nuclear holocaust
 

MastaKiiLA

Member
A small percentage of thousands would be enough…

Honestly, we can only hope this is the case…which isn’t great when being wrong means a nuclear holocaust
All of Russia would be turned to radioactive glass by every other nuclear power in the world. It would be an all against one scenario. The reality is that for all the saber rattling, these people are complete cowards who do not want to die. Nuclear war means Russia is erased from the map, and the rest of the world picks up the pieces ala Japan post-WW2. There is zero chance of a nuclear war IMO. Just doesn't make any logical sense outside of the entire Russian leadership becoming suicidal.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 1159

Unconfirmed Member
All of Russia would be turned to radioactive glass by every other nuclear power in the world. It would be an all against one scenario. The reality is that for all the saber rattling, these people are complete cowards who do not want to die. Nuclear war means Russia is erased from the map, and the rest of the world picks up the pieces ala Japan post-WW2. There is zero chance of a nuclear war IMO. Just doesn't make any logical sense outside of the entire Russian leadership becoming suicidal.
I don’t think nuclear war is likely at all, but even if it’s a 1% chance it’s nothing to scoff at
 

sinnergy

Member
A small percentage of thousands would be enough…

Honestly, we can only hope this is the case…which isn’t great when being wrong means a nuclear holocaust
Doesn’t matter , no one is ever using them . After what happened in Japan.
 
Last edited:

Sakura

Member
All of Russia would be turned to radioactive glass by every other nuclear power in the world.
Only a handful of countries have nuclear weapons, and probably 90%+ of said nuclear weapons are possessed by just the USA and Russia.
I do agree though that there will not be any nuclear war.
 

GymWolf

Member
All of Russia would be turned to radioactive glass by every other nuclear power in the world. It would be an all against one scenario. The reality is that for all the saber rattling, these people are complete cowards who do not want to die. Nuclear war means Russia is erased from the map, and the rest of the world picks up the pieces ala Japan post-WW2. There is zero chance of a nuclear war IMO. Just doesn't make any logical sense outside of the entire Russian leadership becoming suicidal.
Just an ignorant question, can they actually bombard russia with nukes without hurting the close innocent regions?

I mean, it's not like they can put a shield around russia to contain all the radioactive stuff...

It has to be a logistic disaster trying to ONLY hit russia when it comes to nuclear weapons, right?
 
Last edited:

Durien

Member
Just an ignorant question, can they actually bombard russia with nukes without hurting the close innocent regions?

I mean, it's not like they can put a shield around russia to contain all the radioactive stuff...

It has to be a logistic disaster trying to ONLY hit russia when it comes to nuclear weapons, right?
It wouldn't matter at that point. The winds just don't stop blowing. I watched a Ted talk on what would happen if just Pakistan and India went at it and it was pretty much game over.
 

niilokin

Member
out of curiosity would USA (and NATO) actually have enough conventional firepower to not even need to resort to nukes if they would have to retaliate?
 
out of curiosity would USA (and NATO) actually have enough conventional firepower to not even need to resort to nukes if they would have to retaliate?
I'd assume if they don't already have large stock piles of conventional weapons, the US especially would very easily be able to ramp up production of anything needed. Just look at the tonnage of material they created and shipped across the Atlantic during ww2
 
Last edited:

Wildebeest

Member
According to militar specialists, the number of artillery received by Ukraine could filll up to 7 battalions. So this denotes that their original artillery was completely wiped out by Russia. I am not sure about that tough, doesn’t seem easy to find more concrete information.
I don't know anything for sure, which is why I can speak freely about it, naturally. The reports I hear say that one reason why Ukraine needs so much NATO artillery is that NATO does not stock or manufacture the old soviet rounds used by their artillery, and they only have so much in stock.
 

Rat Rage

Member
It’s nuclear war or nothing, and nuclear war is suicide. The only real questions are how suicidal is Putin and who will stand up to him if he tries it.

A nuclear war doesn't make sense at all. Putin is a narcissistic sociopath with a huge power fetish and some paranoid tendencies. Like most megalomaniac dictators, he's deeply concerned about his legacy.
Will he be remembered as a victorious russian leader that "made russia great again", or as one that tried, but ultimately failed because the villainous democracies around the world were simply too strong, or will he go down as the biggest retard in russian history, who was responsible for literally destroying russia forever, because he started a nonsensical nuclear war?
 
D

Deleted member 1159

Unconfirmed Member
A nuclear war doesn't make sense at all. Putin is a narcissistic sociopath with a huge power fetish and some paranoid tendencies. Like most megalomaniac dictators, he's deeply concerned about his legacy.
Will he be remembered as a victorious russian leader that "made russia great again", or as one that tried, but ultimately failed because the villainous democracies around the world were simply too strong, or will he go down as the biggest retard in russian history, who was responsible for literally destroying russia forever, because he started a nonsensical nuclear war?
I don’t think any war with the west makes sense, much less nuclear war. That’s why I said it was suicide…Putin basically is toothless against the west unless he wants to use nukes, and that would mean killing himself. So the basic point I was making was he’s not going to do shit
 

Bitmap Frogs

Mr. Community
I know I've had a hard-on for Kherson and I know it's unrealistic, but UKR is inching closer. Today there were reports of actual fighting at Chernobaivka and UKR launched missile strikes against military targets inside Kherson.

If they manage to take the city and save the bridge I would be very happy.
 

Lord Panda

The Sea is Always Right
Those worried about nuclear war:

Putin started this conflict threatening that if NATO helps Ukraine, he will go nuclear.

NATO is now piling more and more heavy weaponry into Ukraine every day. Why hasn’t he gone nuclear yet?

Because he would then have to say bye to his superyachts, his palaces, and all that sweet gravy he and his cronies have been swimming in at the expense of everyone else.
 

dotnotbot

Member
Those worried about nuclear war:

Putin started this conflict threatening that if NATO helps Ukraine, he will go nuclear.

NATO is now piling more and more heavy weaponry into Ukraine every day. Why hasn’t he gone nuclear yet?

Today he repeated that threat and it seems like:
- he only means direct help? doesn't seem to care too much about supplying weapons which is still a puzzle to me
- everyone thought that 'consequences we have never seen in our history' (not a direct quote but something like that) mean using nuclear weapons but today he stated he would use something that no one else has? what could that be?
- the response will be instantenous so we definitely didn't earn it yet

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom