It's comical the lengths people will go to to defend something they like as "one of the good ones" despite all evidence to the contrary.
The original Kingdom Come marketed itself as a painstakingly researched historical piece. So much so that it was later used as a basis for Czech university courses. Vavra took a hard line approach in 2018 by insisting that "There were no black people in medieval Bohemia. Period", therefore there were none featured in the game, and that ended up being the big point of contention with woke people in 2018. Fast forward to 2025 and suddenly Vavra
did manage to find the only person of color in all the land! Bit strange to have such a pivot on a detail explicitly stated as being 100% factual back then, don't you think?
What's also interesting, from a perspective of "woke vs anti-woke", is comparing the reception of Musa in KC2 to Yasuke in Assassin's Creed Shadows.
Yasuke seems to be an extremely contentious figure, even on this forum, with many insisting his presence in the game is woke. He
was based on a historical figure however, so in fact he even has more of a footing in reality than Musa does, ie. a black man was literally in Japan in servitude of Nobunaga in the 1500s, in some capacity or another. The developers at Ubisoft nowadays admit that they made some embellishments to him, re: was he a samurai, for the sake of the story to work. But at least they are being upfront about that now (even if
their own folly was not doing that from day one).
Musa on the other hand is a completely fictional amalgamation of various historical characters, such as Ibn Battuta (who never set foot in Bohemia). He is a black character who shouldn't even be there according to Vavra circa 2018, and is fictitious enough to have given Vavra artistic license to create whatever the hell kind of character he wanted. Not only did Vavra reverse course about Musa's plausibility, he's also using the character to insert one of the most progressive storytelling stereotypes there is: the smug, enlightened foreigner who knows more than Europeans do, because of course Europeans are all uneducated, treat their women like shit and rob people on highways. Woke storytelling at its finest.
I would bet that Assassin's Creed Shadows, the "woke" game out of the two according to this forum, will not even be so heavy handed in its approach to a foreigner interacting with his Japanese hosts.
The question arises: why the heel turn on what was stated to be historical fact by Vavra 2018? For a forum which also likes a little bit of DEI sleuthing when it comes to Sweet Baby Inc etc, suddenly it's
so annoying to point out that the game is published by Deep Silver, whose parent company Embracer Group is balls deep in ESG and accepted $1 billion from a Saudi investment fund. I'd posit that Vavra accepted whatever terms were thrown at him ("put a Muslim black guy in there") to get his baby funded and across the finish line. Understandable really, but he's now facing one of two realities:
1) everything he fervently said in 2018 was not true and he admits the woke crowd were correct all along, and as one of the converted that's the reason why Musa is now in the game (after all, he says it was "exactly what I wanted it to be")
2) if Vavra stands by what he said in 2018, he is now wilfully pushing an ahistorical interpretation of medievil Bohemia going against his 'top historian' sources - possibly to appease his publisher and/or certain corners of the internet
Either way, he's been caught out on his contradiction and is either dishonest, a pussy or just painfully stupid.
Based on how easily he walked into this, perhaps the latter:
In any case, it's clear that KC2 is no longer the maximally historically accurate game that KC1 marketed itself as, and people have every right to decide not to part with their money for that reason.