• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Wkd Box Office 07•17-19•15 - Ant-Man opens bigger than Antz! lol Schumer rides rails

Status
Not open for further replies.

mreddie

Member
Maybe it really is.....The Pratt Factor
post-51150-Burt-Macklin-you-son-of-a-bitc-0XeG.gif
 
Worldwide Updates:

Magic Mike XXL - $90M
Terminator Genisys - $277M
Spy - $227M
Pitch Perfect 2 - $280M
Ted 2 - $143M
Jurassic World - $1.513B
Minions - $626M
Age of Ultron - $1.394B
Inside Out - $490M

Jurassic World will pass Avengers to become the third highest grossing film of all time in the couple of days.

Can anyone explain to me why Ted 2 so heavily underperformed?

While I thought it was funny in parts I didn't find it as funny or enjoyable as the first was.

I can't quite put my finger on it but it's hard not to look at Ted 2 as a huge disappointment.

I can't imagine Universal being happy with these numbers, but then again consdering the monster year they're having I don't think care too much.

Are people getting tired of Seth McFarlane's shtick?
 

xaosslug

Member
Marvel will continue to make money but with DC looking to be getting things going right and Xmen and Star Wars on the horizon they certainly have competition. Ant-Man shows us that any random Marvel IP isn't guaranteed massive numbers.

this veritable no-name superhero that only warranted a Falcon cameo made almost $60 million domestic opening weekend... I think Marvel's good. LOL
 

kswiston

Member
Avengers grossed 51M after this point. I think JW is still pulling ahead on most days when directly compared. However competition from MI5 and Pixels is coming.

Jurassic World has actually been falling behind in the weekly gross the past two weeks. Jurassic World may win this week since Avengers had a pretty hefty weekend drop, but after that Avengers had two really great drops (21% and 19%) that Jurassic World is unlikely to match given competition. I expect Avengers to have better late legs than Jurassic World based on what we have been seeing.
 
Can anyone explain to me why Ted 2 so heavily underperformed?

While I thought it was funny in parts I didn't find it as funny or enjoyable as the first was.

I can't quite put my finger on it but it's hard not to look at Ted 2 as a huge disappointment.

I can't imagine Universal being happy with these numbers, but then again consdering the monster year they're having I don't think care too much.

Are people getting tired of Seth McFarlane's shtick?

I think people had enough of a foul mouth talking bear with one movie. Even though the first did well and was well liked I'm not so sure how necessary a sequel was. Maybe the novelty wore off?
 

Currygan

at last, for christ's sake
Ant-Man
Domestic: $58,040,000
Foreign: $56,400,000

$114,440,000


not bad, but it's gonna be needin' legs to reach 400+. Personally think it will stop at 380
 

anaron

Member
this veritable no-name superhero that only warranted a Falcon cameo made almost $60 million domestic opening weekend... I think Marvel's good. LOL
haha, exactly. I don't understand how a new franchise launch doing almost 60 mil with an A cinemascore is considered anything but good.
 

Cooter

Lacks the power of instantaneous movement
this veritable no-name superhero that only warranted a Falcon cameo made almost $60 million domestic opening weekend... I think Marvel's good. LOL
Like I said, they're making money. My point is each character has limits and the Marvel name alone doesn't ensure 600+ WW.
 

kswiston

Member
Wait - is Genisys gonna cross 100 mil domestic before its pulled?

I think this weekend killed its chances at $100M. Next week's openers are going to need 15k+ screens combined, and I would imagine that a decent number of those are going to be pulled from Terminator.
 
haha, exactly. I don't understand how a new franchise launch doing almost 60 mil with an A cinemascore is considered anything but good.

Ant Man isn't a new franchise. It's just another entry in the franchise that is Marvel. That's how that company works. They just have the one series of films, and they all tie into each other.

I think this weekend killed its chances at $100M. Next week's openers are going to need 15k+ screens combined, and I would imagine that a decent number of those are going to be pulled from Terminator.

Yeah, that's what prompted me to ask. I saw that it was at 80 and I was like "it might make it" and then I noticed how many theaters it'd already lost, and was like "wait a min.."
 

Abounder

Banned
I think Ant-Man was also one of the cheaper MCU films, nearly half as much as Guardians, or $50 million less than Thor 2. Which probably shows how much Marvel expected from Ant-Man. Guardians even has its own animated show if that means anything
 

Exotoro

Member
I think this weekend killed its chances at $100M. Next week's openers are going to need 15k+ screens combined, and I would imagine that a decent number of those are going to be pulled from Terminator.
What are next week's openers?
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
It made just below expectations (sadly), but at least Ant-Man was #1. Though positive word-of-mouth is likely gonna carry the film through the rest of the summer. More so since, besides Trainwreck (which came out alongside Ant-Man), I can't name any hyped-up movies coming later this summer of the top of my head.
If I did miss any, please let me know.
 

kswiston

Member
Ant-Man
Domestic: $58,040,000
Foreign: $56,400,000

$114,440,000


not bad, but it's gonna be needin' legs to reach 400+. Personally think it will stop at 380

Ant-Man still has about 30 territories to open in, including China, South Korea, and a decent chunk of Europe. It will have no problem reaching $400M.
 

3N16MA

Banned
Jurassic World has actually been falling behind in the weekly gross the past two weeks. Jurassic World may win this week since Avengers had a pretty hefty weekend drop, but after that Avengers had two really great drops (21% and 19%) that Jurassic World is unlikely to match given competition. I expect Avengers to have better late legs than Jurassic World based on what we have been seeing.

Doesn't one of those weeks include Memorial Day?
 

Wanderer5

Member
It made just below expectations (sadly), but at least Ant-Man was #1. Though positive word-of-mouth is likely gonna carry the film through the rest of the summer. More so since, besides Trainwreck (which came out alongside Ant-Man), I can't name any hyped-up movies coming later this summer of the top of my head.
If I did miss any, please let me know.

Mission Impossible, probably Pixels and Fantastic 4.
 

xaosslug

Member
Like I said, they're making money. My point is each character has limits and the Marvel name alone doesn't ensure 600+ WW.

you said it doesn't guarantee massive numbers, and I think $60m is a pretty massive number for an obscure/jokey comic book character's first film.

this is an impressive opening by any measure, unless you are someone trying to take the wind out of Marvel's sail w/ your ridiculous, ever-changing standards of 'success'...
 

kswiston

Member
Doesn't one of those weeks include Memorial Day?

The weeks where Avengers was ahead or the weeks to come? Memorial Day fell in Avengers 4th weekend. The next two weeks weren't holiday weeks. Just a couple of weeks where competition was light.

What are next week's openers?

Pixels, South Paw, and Paper Towns. Regardless of what they gross, that's still a 3500+ venue film, a 2750 venue film, and a 3100 venue film. Pixels will also get multiple screens in multiplexes. Those screens need to come from somewhere.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Mission Impossible, probably Pixels and Fantastic 4.
I wouldn't call that hyped-up. Some may see it to find out if it's a train-wreck, but F4 will have to get reviews on-par with Guardians to see success at this rate (more so with the negative stigma surrounding it).

I don't have any knowledge of the Mission Impossible franchise's success, so I'd appreciate it if someone filled in the blanks for me so I can give a more informed opinion in that regard (I just know that they historically do pretty well). As for Pixels, I'm 50/50 on that one, more so since Adam Sandler isn't exactly the biggest star in Hollywood as of recently.
 

mreddie

Member
I think Ant-Man was also one of the cheaper MCU films, nearly half as much as Guardians, or $50 million less than Thor 2. Which probably shows how much Marvel expected from Ant-Man. Guardians even has its own animated show if that means anything

But that animated show came after the success. Again, I think no one thought Guardians was gonna bust down the doors as it did. Yeah, the trailers helped but I think no one thought it was gonna be a mega smash.
 

Cooter

Lacks the power of instantaneous movement
you said it doesn't guarantee massive numbers, and I think $60m is a pretty massive number for an obscure/jokey comic book character's first film.

this is an impressive opening by any measure, unless you are someone trying to take the wind out of Marvel's sail w/ your ridiculous, ever-changing standards of 'success'...
60 isn't massive. It is very solid. You can downplay the IP and call it jokey to differentiate it from the greater MCU but it is part of it and it is the lowest grossing film of the group in quite a while.
 

kswiston

Member
Thor finished at 449, Cap did indeed end at 370

I'm doubting its legs tho, but I guess we'll see

Legs won't matter if China and South Korea gross $90-100M combined (which is entirely reasonable, and well behind what many recent superhero films have grossed there)

Eventual Domestic gross + what it has already grossed overseas is already half of your $200M.
 

3N16MA

Banned
The weeks where Avengers was ahead or the weeks to come? Memorial Day fell in Avengers 4th weekend. The next two weeks weren't holiday weeks. Just a couple of weeks where competition was light.



Pixels, South Paw, and Paper Towns. Regardless of what they gross, that's still a 3500+ venue film, a 2750 venue film, and a 3100 venue film. Pixels will also get multiple screens in multiplexes. Those screens need to come from somewhere.

I was only looking at the last 7 days in which JW has been ahead of Avengers day to day and Memorial day gave Avengers a boost in its 4th week which JW did not have. However you're right in that Avengers beat it day to day the weekend after Memorial Day.

Also I agree that competition is going to take away screens as they're big openers.
 

mreddie

Member
60 isn't massive. It is very solid. You can downplay the IP and call it jokey to differentiate it from the greater MCU but it is part of it and it is the lowest grossing film of the group in quite a while.

Nah, that honor still goes to 2008 Hulk.
 

Wanderer5

Member
I wouldn't call that hyped-up. Some may see it to find out if it's a train-wreck, but F4 will have to get reviews on-par with Guardians to see success at this rate (more so with the negative stigma surrounding it).

I don't have any knowledge of the Mission Impossible franchise's success, so I'd appreciate it if someone filled in the blanks for me so I can give a more informed opinion in that regard (I just know that they historically do pretty well). As for Pixels, I'm 50/50 on that one, more so since Adam Sandler isn't exactly the biggest star in Hollywood as of recently.

Hm Mission: Impossible series seem like the types that might not bring in big opening but have had some decent legs. Ghost Protocol had the lowest opening here with $29 million, but was able to be the second behind MI2 in the long run for domestic, and became the highest worldwide with almost $700 million.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom