PezDispenser
Banned
His argument was that the main engine never changes which is quite silly and I was just giving an example closest to home. Lets take Nintendo most successful series that continues to be so, Super Mario Bros. Are the physics still the same as they were in 1985? No, because people would get tired of that. In fact people say they are getting tired of the NSMB games and that Nintendo should spruce things up. Change can be good and stagnation isn't.
Like I said earlier, the true test it to see where Nintendo takes the next Smash Bros. They obviously thought they were doing the right thing with Brawl but for a section of the fanbase what they did was wrong. This all stems back to the comment that Nintendo won't do what the fans want, but we can't tell until we see the next game.
Wow, you picked what is quite possibly the worst example to support your case. It would be hard to argue against the idea that the Super Mario games have changed very little over the past 25 years and still make shit tons of cash. Are they exactly the same in every way? No. But they are incredibly, remarkably similar to the point that if you brought a Mario fan from 1985 into the present day with a time machine, he'd feel pretty much right at home with NSMBU. The formula was a winner, they kept it largely intact, and it sold buttloads over the course of decades.
And apparently you read it all wrong because I never said it was just to do with a formula but general business practises. You're the one who keeps bringing it back to games.
You're right, sorry I keep sidetracking the conversation in a way that makes it relevant to the topic. You realize that videogame companies are businesses, right?
I just said companies make changes and it's understandable why because if they didn't adapt they could risk failing. And when did I say it was 100% correct, I just said it wasn't my wording.
It's one thing to change your business strategy to adapt to a changing marketplace. It's another thing entirely to make sweeping changes to an already successful product formula under the pretense that you will somehow risk failure if you don't.
And I can't link to a text book.
Aww... =(