• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

SFV R. Mika default costume was deemed too revealing by ESPN

Neoxon

Junior Member
I legit thought it was just a joke when I first heard about it. Largely because, as someone who doesn't watch a lot of US TV nowadays, I had just assumed the bar for sexual content could only drop lower as time goes on, thus it wouldn't have been an issue. i.e. I remember the Sable era of WWE way back (a show on a different network with probably an older TV-rating compared to Evo, but with youngsters watching nonetheless).

But if it means Evo can be televised again, then I'd be all for doing whatever it takes to be in compliance (whether that means modifying existing costumes or just adding more conservative ones). For once, SF in America is on a stage no other fighting game has ever been on; if they want to stay there they can no longer have their (cheese)cake & eat it too.
If the modifications to the defaults are too severe, they can just add more conservative costumes. For example, Rainbow Mika can get her Alpha costume as her Nostalgic Costume, while Cammy's CPT costume can easily be used as her more conservative outfit
 

Yukinari

Member
I bought the fucking game. I avoid playing online because of shits like this.
I will not even by gunpoint buy the laura story mode outfit, but I can't make people who I play online choose which costume or character they are playing. So this DOES hurt my gaming time.

no-fun.jpg
 

Reverend Funk

Comfy Penetration
I enjoy smut as much as the next guy but its obvious that if capcom really wants to attract a wider more casual audience they need to tone down some of the designs.
 

JP_

Banned
Mika is a wrestler. Beyond the super big boobs (which are too big for her costume), her look fits right in with the rest of those pictures posted earlier. Costumes meant to show off muscles and have good visual appeal. Her costume isn't the greatest (Story 1 is better of course) but I think that's probably because Capcom chose to inflate everyone's chest by 200% =P Besides, your expression of nudity and another person's "cheap sex appeal" and "pandering."
I mean here, it seems like you basically agree -- the costume might be inspired by flashy wrestling costumes but it's on another level in terms of physics-defying cuts. It's almost like the difference between a bikini bottom and a g-string -- it's just weird when people pretend or even honestly can't see the difference.

See, I was with you until now. First, if you're calling SFV "softcore porn," your criticisms will fall on deaf ears. Because its not that. Do you even know what that is? Cheesecake is not softcore porn. If so, ESPN themselves would be selling softcore porn magazines themselves.
I called DoA softcore porn, but I didn't call SFV softcore porn -- but SFV is certainly borrowing elements from games that are primarily about sex appeal, like DoA. And you can argue semantics about what constitutes "softcore porn" but it's pretty undeniable that DoA's main feature is the sex appeal. I agree with you later when you say SFV is trying to have it both ways. I don't really think it works.

Second, you assume SFV wants to be taken seriously beyond its niche. Does it? If it does, its design of EVERY SINGLE CHARACTER would be different. Completely. Also, SF as a GAME would have to redesigned completely to be enjoyed by a much wider audience in 2016+ Was this Capcom's intent? Well, if so, it failed since it's barely, maybe, managed to hit 2 million sales by now? That's not very wide.
Again, you're misreading what I said. I said SFV presumably wants to be taken seriously beyond the softcore porn niche, which I do not consider that to be SF's niche -- SF was never DoA. Capcom has also signaled, on multiple occasions, through both actions (the "censorship" people throw fits over) and very clear statements, that they do want to reach a larger audience. It's also worth pointing out -- that's different than making a game that appeals to everyone, so try not to conflate those two.

Third, I think people react the way they do towards criticism is how the criticism is done. There is a right way (a way that does not insult its fanbase or those who enjoy the game but concentrates on the game and design itself) and the wrong way (calling it softcore porn, 14 year old mentality, insulting its fans and so on).
I'm not convinced that pointing out that comical boob bouncing and excessive panty shots exemplify 14 year old sensibilities is an insult.

For example, SFV on ESPN2. All last night, this forum and Twitter was ablaze of people who made fun of gamers who watched this on ESPN and even ESPN 2 for showing the game to begin with. These people insulted and criticized both the network and gamers alike for wasting their time or enjoying the game. Of course, gamers shot back and said "ACCEPT IT" and so on and looked at this as a sort of victory. Now the dust settles and we find that ESPN objected to an aspect of the game and some were like "Whoa now, wait a minute...you show questionable stuff too, how it this so bad?" and round and round it goes.
I think this is a very tribalistic way of looking at things. I don't think it's healthy to look at it like two opposing teams. I'm 100% for esports being shown on sports networks. I think video games do have, to some degree, an unfair stigma. But I think it's still important to be critical of things I like. Part of that negative stigma is unfair, but part of it is earned. Games are not infallible and I don't think it's smart to jump to the defense of games unconditionally. An important part of combating that negative stigma is to improve the games themselves. We can't stubbornly refuse to grow up as an industry.

Personally, I think SFV and Capcom are trying to have their cheesecake and eat it too. Both sexes in this game flaunt their bare chests, boobs, legs, arms muscle power and asses. Capcom did this knowingly. They put out costumes that continue to do this. In the same breath, they made changes to certain things they thought might make people uncomfortable or offended. Some people, like yourself, say that Capcom has to make changes to be taken seriously. You also ignore that these characters and the game and all the cheap sex appeal that comes with them, has brought the game and EVO to ESPN to begin with. The community the game was made for accepted all of it and it has gotten this big. So, now what? What do we do now? Do they change everything to make it acceptable to the masses...while being a game that was NOT accepted by the masses to begin with? What would make it acceptable to the masses? Who do you please?
I think it's fallacious to assume SF has risen to this point because of the fanservice. I think it's much more reasonable to assume, instead, that it has risen in spite of it. This isn't the first time ESPN has shown a video game on TV -- fighting games are actually lagging behind other genres and I think their art direction has definitely held them back.
 

Raging Spaniard

If they are Dutch, upright and breathing they are more racist than your favorite player
Again, it's not the boobs. It's the butt. Mika's butt goes from nearly uncovered to completely covered with a change to her Story outfit.

Thats up to you. The butt looks like a swimsuit, but the boobs are out there, man
 

Platy

Member
How are these kind of sweeping generalizations allowed?

Would be better to say "these developers made breasts who does not work like breasts and women who does not wear stuff that women who have big breasts wear while doing physical activity showing that they either did not made any research about how breasts work or did not care about what they show so much to care about" ?


Or you can read like "capcom could make a switch to enable or disable certain costumes so that everyone have fun"

But the best course would be SHOW SOME FUCKING DIVERSITY WHILE CREATING FEMALE CHARACTERS then everyone will get fun since diversity DOES MEAN sexy characters.
 
I bought the fucking game. I avoid playing online because of shits like this.
I will not even by gunpoint buy the laura story mode outfit, but I can't make people who I play online choose which costume or character they are playing. So this DOES hurt my gaming time.
Aren't you a Poison fan? What makes Laura's story mode outfit so much more unacceptable for you than Poison's default?
 

Akronis

Member
...

I called DoA softcore porn, but I didn't call SFV softcore porn -- but SFV is certainly borrowing elements from games that are primarily about sex appeal, like DoA. And you can argue semantics about what constitutes "softcore porn" but it's pretty undeniable that DoA's main feature is the sex appeal. I agree with you later when you say SFV is trying to have it both ways. I don't really think it works.

...

You really think the reason people buy DoA is the sex appeal? The fuck are you talking about?

DoA Extreme sure, but normal DoA is your bog standard fighting game.

EDIT: I'm wrong about the above

Most fighting games have ridiculously exaggerated character models.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Again, it's not the boobs. It's the butt. Mika's butt goes from nearly uncovered to completely covered with a change to her Story outfit.

For an example...

I present to you, how it usually looks watching Women's Beach Volleyball ESPN shows/broadcasts. Most of these shots are from the 2012 Olympics as well.


And yes, they focus the shots on the butts every chance they get, and ground angle more often than not, instead of more above like Tennis. Especially when they are picking wedgies out.
 

Mik317

Member
why do people try so hard to place realism on a game in which peeps throw fireballs and shit. No shit it's not realistic. Its not supposed to be

so yeah Mika's tits are huge as fuck and probably should pop out...is that really where you draw the line in the sand at?

what a pointless thing to bring up.
 

Htown

STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
You really think the reason people buy DoA is the sex appeal? The fuck are you talking about?

DoA Extreme sure, but normal DoA is your bog standard fighting game.

Most fighting games have ridiculously exaggerated character models.

The whole series has sold itself on the sex appeal of its characters. The big selling point for the very first game was the ridiculous breast physics.
 

AgeEighty

Member
I just want to know how the center part of her story outfit stays pinned between her breasts. Did she design her outfit with a rigid piece specifically to mold to her chest?
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
why do people try so hard to place realism on a game in which peeps throw fireballs and shit. No shit it's not realistic. Its not supposed to be

so yeah Mika's tits are huge as fuck and probably should pop out...is that really where you draw the line in the sand at?

what a pointless thing to bring up.
There's a difference. People poin out the lack of believability. Ryu throwing Hadokens is believable in context. The majority of women dressing up in skimpy outfits that would result in them constantly having to pop heir breasts back in and are clearly designed for NOTHING other than cheap sexual objectification are not not. Another thing to consider is that Ru throwing a fireball has nothing to do with the fact that he's a man, the women being designed that way, absolutely is. The males are often designed in a way that resembles caricatures and because they're supposed to "look cool," not for sexualization, (even more proof of this is that Capcom was surprised at the way that the fans reacted to Ryu shirtless."), it's usually the opposite situation for the female characters, these leads to the game feeling less inclusive. Excuse like "it's fiction1!!1" are actually insulting to artists, because it implies that no thought needs to go into making things believable.
 
I did not like how Capcom decided to make everything more revealing and sexualised from SFIV to SFV. If they are really pushing for esports then they have to make some sacrifices.
 

ishibear

is a goddamn bear
Heh it's really weird to see DOA used to defend SF when for the longest time, nobody would claim DOA because of its content.
 
I bought the fucking game. I avoid playing online because of shits like this.
I will not even by gunpoint buy the laura story mode outfit, but I can't make people who I play online choose which costume or character they are playing. So this DOES hurt my gaming time.

Wait, you avoid playing online because you don't want to see "sexy" characters. Is that right?
 

JP_

Banned
For an example...

I present to you, how it usually looks watching Women's Beach Volleyball ESPN shows/broadcasts. Most of these shots are from the 2012 Olympics as well.



And yes, they focus the shots on the butts every chance they get, and ground angle more often than not, instead of more above like Tennis. Especially when they are picking wedgies out.

I'm not convinced you've watched more than a sexy highlight reel of beach volleyball.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPcCHbI03sE
 

Palculator

Unconfirmed Member
The whole series has sold itself on the sex appeal of its characters. The big selling point for the very first game was the ridiculous breast physics.
But if that was the only appeal the sales for the Xtreme spin offs, which only focus on titillation (or at least mostly), should be just as high as those for the base game, which they aren't. To say the DOA games' only appeal or purchasing incentive is jiggle is reductive. They wouldn't even feature male characters (like they do in the Xtreme series) if that was the only thing they're going for.
 

Platy

Member
Aren't you a Poison fan? What makes Laura's story mode outfit so much more unacceptable for you than Poison's default?

Poison is one of the 9 trans characters ever. (this is NOT a random number)
In an ideal world, trans characters would not be as sexualized, but with just 9 trans characters you can't choose =P

And if they made Laura trans it would make MUCH more sense, because "brazil is full of trans women" (to not say the extremaly offensive wording "brazilian shemale") is a MUCH more true stereotype than minuscule tops without bra and those types of panties that I don't even know the name in english because I never saw a single women using this in brazil

And yes, Poison uses a bra and her top is closer to a sports bra so SOME support she has
 

The Hermit

Member
There's a difference. People poin out the lack of believability. Ryu throwing Hadokens is believable in context. The majority of women dressing up in skimpy outfits that would result in them constantly having to pop heir breasts back in and are clearly designed for NOTHING other than cheap sexual objectification are not not.

What?!

😂😂

Its just a costume. I would understand if Mika was very sensual, like Juri, but she's just silly.
 
Poison is one of the 9 trans characters ever. (this is NOT a random number)
In an ideal world, trans characters would not be as sexualized, but with just 9 trans characters you can't choose =P

And if they made Laura trans it would make MUCH more sense, because "brazil is full of trans women" (to not say the extremaly offensive wording "brazilian shemale") is a MUCH more true stereotype than minuscule tops without bra and those types of panties that I don't even know the name in english because I never saw a single women using this in brazil

And yes, Poison uses a bra and her top is closer to a sports bra so SOME support she has

Haha

poisongif.gif
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
I'm not convinced you've watched more than a sexy highlight reel of beach volleyball.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPcCHbI03sE

You are showing the Olympics broadcast. I am talking about ESPN's beach volleyball coverage. Totally different animals, and watch their Olympic 'highlight reals' of them when you get the chance, pay close attention this year.

I posted a page or two back about how they view it with a Page 2 article written to men, about 'babes on the beach, and don't waste money in the strip clubs, instead come spend it during the beach volleyball tournaments where the girls are guaranteed to impress more sexually'.

ESPN knows what they are doing with that. I am not the only one to mention it in here. There was an entire sub-culture created off of their women's beach volleyball broadcasts, lol.
 

AgeEighty

Member
The context of it being a video game and not real life.

Even works of fiction have rules.

It's like that new Ghostbusters movie. In context, proton packs and ghosts make sense. One ghostbuster diving into a portal to save another, and falling what looks like a half a mile to catch her, all while tethered to the winch off a vehicle above that can't be longer than fifty feet, and then pulling them both back up, doesn't make sense and made everybody I was with roll their eyes.
 

Kinyou

Member
But if that was the only appeal the sales for the Xtreme spin offs, which only focus on titillation (or at least mostly), should be just as high as those for the base game, which they aren't. To say the DOA games' only appeal or purchasing incentive is jiggle is reductive. They wouldn't even feature male characters (like they do in the Xtreme series) if that was the only thing they're going for.
It's like Mortal Kombat and the violence. It's certainly a draw, but far from the only one the game offers.
 
Using the story costume instead of the default one made no difference in terms of the presentation being visually underwhelming.

To people like you, it may not make a difference, but to people like me who like seeing sexy Mika fight, it does.
 

Kintaro

Worships the porcelain goddess
I mean here, it seems like you basically agree -- the costume might be inspired by flashy wrestling costumes but it's on another level in terms of physics-defying cuts. It's almost like the difference between a bikini bottom and a g-string -- it's just weird when people pretend or even honestly can't see the difference.

I think her boobs are too big. That's about it.

I called DoA softcore porn, but I didn't call SFV softcore porn -- but SFV is certainly borrowing elements from games that are primarily about sex appeal, like DoA. And you can argue semantics about what constitutes "softcore porn" but it's pretty undeniable that DoA's main feature is the sex appeal. I agree with you later when you say SFV is trying to have it both ways. I don't really think it works.

"Softcore porn" has truly become a catch all buzzword nowadays.

Again, you're misreading what I said. I said SFV presumably wants to be taken seriously beyond the softcore porn niche, which I do not consider that to be SF's niche -- SF was never DoA. Capcom has also signaled, on multiple occasions, through both actions (the "censorship" people throw fits over) and very clear statements, that they do want to reach a larger audience. It's also worth pointing out -- that's different than making a game that appeals to everyone, so try not to conflate those two.

Alright, so what is the mythical larger audience they are trying to capture? Because the days of SF2 are over. If you're going to hit up the CoD crowd, GTA crowd or any other "big" audience, Street Fighter will have to change genres completely. =P Larger audience is just another buzz word. It's meaningless unless you can tell me what it means. It already reach a large enough audience to be shown on ESPN.

I'm not convinced that pointing out that comical boob bouncing and excessive panty shots exemplify 14 year old sensibilities is an insult.

Well, it is probably insulting to a great deal of 14 year olds. So, you're generalizing.

I think this is a very tribalistic way of looking at things. I don't think it's healthy to look at it like two opposing teams. I'm 100% for esports being shown on sports networks. I think video games do have, to some degree, an unfair stigma. But I think it's still important to be critical of things I like. Part of that negative stigma is unfair, but part of it is earned. Games are not infallible and I don't think it's smart to jump to the defense of games unconditionally. An important part of combating that negative stigma is to improve the games themselves. We can't stubbornly refuse to grow up as an industry.

The industry is growing up and growing out. Certainly growing out in how to take you money. Now, you say its tribalistic? I say thats exactly what happened. You had non gamers tuning in to ESPN and going "WTF is this shit?" on social media and then you had Gamers going "Suck it!" in defense. Like, that actually occured. So back and look. I sadly see the shit happen every single day in my store for the past decade. People who view games as a complete waste of time vs. those who don't and love it and defend it. The stigma was not against SFV, it was against games and gamers itself.


I think it's fallacious to assume SF has risen to this point because of the fanservice. I think it's much more reasonable to assume, instead, that it has risen in spite of it. This isn't the first time ESPN has shown a video game on TV -- fighting games are actually lagging behind other genres and I think their art direction has definitely held them back.

No, but the fanservice was always there since SF2. You are blind to deny it. The community since then has grown with it and accepted it. It's a part of what makes the entire SF experience. If it didn't want it, I would like to think it would have made that message clear in the 20+ years of Street Fighter.

Art direction didn't hold them back. The numbers did. Period. MOBAs, FPS and such had the numbers in terms of viewers to make it worth showing on TV. For the first time, with the support of Sony, Capcom and the biggest tournament in the world, they had the numbers.

Now, do you think ESPN Will be showing the rest of the CPT? I doubt it. Why? Money and numbers.
 

Palculator

Unconfirmed Member
come on guys. DOA3 advertisment was she kicks high.

lets be real here
It's clear that sex appeal is a huge part of DOA (even more so now with Hayashi at the helm, it seems), I just think it's weird to say it's the only thing the games have to offer. Not like you can sell a game on sex appeal alone, otherwise the Xtreme series or games with even less gameplay like the Sexy Beach series should outsell mainline DOA games. Even games like Senran Kagura are only really successful now because they offer decent gameplay alongside the lewds.
It's like with Mortal Kombat and the violence. It's certainly a draw, but far from the only one the game offers.
Yup!
 
The context of it being a video game and not real life.

Well, energy-based projectiles provide a key mechanic that's been present in the series since the beginning. I mean, maybe it should be jettisoned in favor of realism such that characters can only execute combat moves real people can do, but you'd fundamentally be changing the core experience. The outfits are just aesthetic choices. Mind you, some may argue that they're integral to the experience, but I think it's harder to justify that.

I'm not saying that I'm right and you're wrong or that I deserve to speak for the FGC fanbase (I don't), but I just personally feel like "it's not a realistic series!" is a less convincing justification for fanservice costumes than it is for core gameplay mechanics like characters throwing fireballs around. Altering Mika to show less skin doesn't fundamentally change the game.

There's still a lot of time left to see how this pans out, but like I said from my first post here I think this is a really good example of the crossroads we are at in terms of the dialogue the industry is having.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Well, energy-based projectiles provide a key mechanic that's been present in the series since the beginning. I mean, maybe it should be jettisoned in favor of realism such that characters can only execute combat moves real people can do, but you'd fundamentally be changing the core experience. The outfits are just aesthetic choices. Mind you, some may argue that they're integral to the experience, but I think it's harder to justify that.

I'm not saying that I'm right and you're wrong or that I deserve to speak for the FGC fanbase (I don't), but I just personally feel like "it's not a realistic series!" is a less convincing justification for fanservice costumes than it is for core gameplay mechanics like characters throwing fireballs around. Altering Mika to show less skin doesn't fundamentally change the game.

There's still a lot of time left to see how this pans out, but like I said from my first post here I think this is a really good example of the crossroads we are at in terms of the dialogue the industry is having.

I for one would like to hear their take on it in contrast with their other programming/article choices.
 

Platy

Member
What bra? What support? Her breasts hang loose on a flimsy rag of a shirt that barely fits her.

ultra-sf4-newscreen10.jpg


Saying this is okay but Laura isn't is just hypocrytical.

ghZYpop.png


IEIVu90.png


Under her breast you can see the straps firmly atached, meaning that it does give SOME support.

Never said it was ok ... on the contrary, if you read my posts you can read that I like Poison because representation matters, not because of her design.

That said, her breasts does have MUCH more support than a character who would make more sense to fight topless because that is what would happen 5 seconds of someone doing an actual cosplay of that without any tape
 

yurinka

Member
I find censorship, lack of freedom of speech and creative freedom a very important issue.

To reject this for beeing "too revealing" is not that different than to mandate them to wear certain types of clothes, like a burka.

Even more worrying when violence is ok for them and is coming from a channel with a MMA show (with all my respect to MMA, it shouldn't be an issue to have a show like that if the fighters do it because they want).
 

AtticuSMT

Banned
I bought the fucking game. I avoid playing online because of shits like this.
I will not even by gunpoint buy the laura story mode outfit, but I can't make people who I play online choose which costume or character they are playing. So this DOES hurt my gaming time.

This has to be a joke. I have a hard time believing someone thinks this way seriously.

Your saying that someone using a costume you hate is hurting your gaming time and you defend that point with "I purchased the game". Just easily someone else can use that exact same argument as to why they should be allowed to use a costume you don't like. I think the Phoenix outfit for mika is stupid looking... But I don't parade around saying "this HURTS my precious gaming time" because guess what, nothing changed, I'm still playing street fighter, the game is still the same.

I can't believe that someone legitimately is making this argument...
 

kirblar

Member
Mika is a stereotype turned to 11 and is hilarious, buts it's one non Japanese audiences have no context for.

Poison in SFIV was the one exception, and thats because it's her whole gimmick.
 
Top Bottom