• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

AMD RDNA 4 and RX 9000 Series Reveal Event |OT| February 28th | 5am PST/8am EST (9070 XT $599 USD / 9070 $549 USD - Availability Starting Mar 6)

FireFly

Member
I think PSSR and FSR4 are separate entities. FSR4 is much newer and designed around RDNA4 hardware, PSSR started life in 2020/2021 when Cerny designed Pro hardware.

My prediction is that Sony will drop PSSR and use FSR4/5 on PS6 (FSR4 looks to have better quality than PSSR already).
Right, FSR 4 has been in development for like 1.5 years.


Also AMD said that FSR 4 requires 779 TOPS, compared with the 300 TOPS that PSSR uses. And finally in the presentation, AMD seemed to be claiming that the Performance (not Quality) mode delivered similar image quality to native. If true, that would put it closer to DLSS 4 than PSSR.
 
Last edited:
I'm gonna try and snag one if PT performance is good and sell my 4080. I can't lie but Nvidia has really lost me with their behavior
Selling the RTX4080 just to buy the RX 9070 XT doesnt make any sese. You will see no performance gains, but most likely performance regression in the most demanding PT games (especially Black Myth Wukong because this game in PT mode relies on OMM engine). The FSR4 image reconstruction and FSR frame generation will probably also not work as good as DLSS technology.

9070 XT make sense only for people who want to upgrade from much older and weaker cards that are vram limited now (pascal, turing or RDNA1).
 
Last edited:

Soodanim

Member
Selling the RTX4080 just to buy the RX 9070 XT doesnt make any sese. You will see no performance gains, but most likely performance regression in the most demanding PT games (especially Black Myth Wukong because this game in PT mode relies on OMM engine). The FSR4 image reconstruction and FSR frame generation will probably also not work as good as DLSS technology.

9070 XT make sense only for people who want to upgrade from much older and weaker cards that are vram limited now (pascal, turing or RDNA1).

Animated GIF

(Not for me, I'm on Turing)
 
Last edited:
RIP RTX 5070Ti


Now lets see if consumers are actually clever and the 9070XT sells well, because this is exactly what we have been asking for.
Actual competition.

By all accounts the 9070XT should be the better buy especially when looking at actual prices of cards on the market.....a better buy by a long shot actually.
LMAO they were going to sell out no matter what

If you have 10 of something, and you sell those 10 things for $20 instead of $200 knowing it will sell out no matter what, who's the retard? That's right, it's you

AMD could have priced it for $699 and still sold them all. So I'm not sure what their plan is here, unless they can dramatically increase supply and actually grab market share, from the standpoint of maximizing profit selling for anything less than what the market will bear is stupid as shit

Also people acting like Nvidia has written their prices on stone tablets is hilarious, if Nvidia actually felt any pressure from AMD in market share they could lower their prices lol
 
Last edited:

TVexperto

Member
Ive been nvidia customer but I am wanting to switch is there an table showing what would be the simliar nvidia gpu currently for their whole lineup?
 

Crayon

Member
LMAO they were going to sell out no matter what

If you have 10 of something, and you sell those 10 things for $20 instead of $200 knowing it will sell out no matter what, who's the retard? That's right, it's you

AMD could have priced it for $699 and still sold them all. So I'm not sure what their plan is here, unless they can dramatically increase supply and actually grab market share, from the standpoint of maximizing profit selling for anything less than what the market will bear is stupid as shit

Also people acting like Nvidia has written their prices on stone tablets is hilarious, if Nvidia actually felt any pressure from AMD in market share they could lower their prices lol

You're asking them to do exactly what destroyed their reputation.
 
some FPS numbers from AMD

Interesting where they test it
65b59f187a280039124cf43381835c39.png




Better ask who have AMD cards and use it. I don't have AMD card for now
Why are you showing AMD's 4K performance up against nVidia's 4K | Raytraced Performance? This is apples to Oranges. What is the point you are trying to make? When you turn off Raytracing, the game changes in nVidia's favor.

IF you look here, the 5070TI is pushing 158fps @ 4k whereas AMD is hitting 144fps @ 4K. I'd love to see apples to apples raytracing performance, but I doubt AMD will publish that till benchmarks come out.

I'm on pcie5 lol

I just realized I was looking at old data.
 
Last edited:
Animated GIF

(Not for me, I'm on Turing)
Yes, it's about money, otherwise you wouldnt care that much about the price difference. Nvidia cards are objectively better, that's why most PC gamers were buying geforce cards for the last couple of years. At best that radeon 9070 XT will offer similar performance as the two years old RTX4080 and worse upscaling features (after seeing that PT tech demo running on the 9070 XT I dont think FSR4 is even as good as DLSS3, the amount of nose and ghosting was insane).

If I had a very limited budget and wanted to buy a good GPU right now, I would probably choose the AMD 9070 XT, but with my salary I would rather buy the 5070ti, even though AMD card offers better performance per dollar, because playing games without DLSS features would not be the same experience. If I'm going to buy a new card, I want to be happy with the experience. I would not compromise my gaming experience just to send a message.
 
Last edited:

CrustyBritches

Gold Member
So, dumb this down for me.

What perfomance ballpark are we looking to compared to Nvidia and at what price?
AMDs benchmarks vs 5070 Ti = -2% on standard models, +2% on premium OC models.

Keep in mind companies will do their best to make their product look good, so we'll have to wait for 3rd-party reviews. Then we have to wait to see real-world availability and retail pricing. For example, 5070 Ti has a MSRP of $750, but real-world average shelf price of $928 with no availability. I have no doubt 9070 XT is going to trounce it in bang-for-buck. Going by both MSRP and actual shelf price. 9070 XT = $599 MSRP.


 
Last edited:
AMDs benchmarks vs 5070 Ti = -2% on standard models, +2% on premium OC models.

Keep in mind companies will do their best to make their product look good, so we'll have to wait for 3rd-party reviews. Then we have to wait to see real-world availability and retail pricing. For example, 5070 Ti has a MSRP of $750, but real-world average shelf price of $928 with no availability. I have no doubt 9070 XT is going to trounce it in bang-for-buck. Going by both MSRP and actual shelf price. 9070 XT = $599 MSRP.
I'll wait for the real benches.
 

demigod

Member
LMAO they were going to sell out no matter what

If you have 10 of something, and you sell those 10 things for $20 instead of $200 knowing it will sell out no matter what, who's the retard? That's right, it's you

AMD could have priced it for $699 and still sold them all. So I'm not sure what their plan is here, unless they can dramatically increase supply and actually grab market share, from the standpoint of maximizing profit selling for anything less than what the market will bear is stupid as shit

Also people acting like Nvidia has written their prices on stone tablets is hilarious, if Nvidia actually felt any pressure from AMD in market share they could lower their prices lol
A profit of $20 is better than $0. $50 discount for inferior tech was not worth going AMD.
 

lachesis

Member
I hope AMD would bring RTX HDR type of SDR to HDR enhancement to streaming sdr videos soon.
As I'm using my pc as streaming + gaming... and it does seem to cover gaming pretty well, but I really enjoy the video enhancements on RTX cards on my main rig...
 

Soodanim

Member
Yes, it's about money, otherwise you wouldnt care that much about the price difference. Nvidia cards are objectively better, that's why most PC gamers were buying geforce cards for the last couple of years. At best that radeon 9070 XT will offer similar performance as the two years old RTX4080 and worse upscaling features (after seeing that PT tech demo running on the 9070 XT I dont think FSR4 is even as good as DLSS3, the amount of nose and ghosting was insane).

If I had a very limited budget and wanted to buy a good GPU right now, I would probably choose the AMD 9070 XT, but with my salary I would rather buy the 5070ti (or even the 5080), even though AMD offers better performance per dollar, because playing games without DLSS features would not be the same experience. If I'm going to buy a new card, I want to be happy with the experience, not compromise and be unhappy with my gaming experience just to send a message.
Not sure if you accidentally quoted my gif or Puscifer's identical gif
 

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
LMAO they were going to sell out no matter what

If you have 10 of something, and you sell those 10 things for $20 instead of $200 knowing it will sell out no matter what, who's the retard? That's right, it's you

AMD could have priced it for $699 and still sold them all. So I'm not sure what their plan is here, unless they can dramatically increase supply and actually grab market share, from the standpoint of maximizing profit selling for anything less than what the market will bear is stupid as shit

Also people acting like Nvidia has written their prices on stone tablets is hilarious, if Nvidia actually felt any pressure from AMD in market share they could lower their prices lol

You are betting the 9070XT sells out?

Ill take that bet.
See you a month after launch we check prices and see if supply/demand pushes the price up anywhere near whats happened with the 5070Ti.
 

SolidQ

Member
I'll be damned
Also notes from them
  1. RX-1182: Testing done by AMD performance labs February 2025, on a test system configured with Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU, 32 GB DDR5-6000 Memory, Windows 11 Pro and Radeon RX 9070 XT & RX 9070 (Driver 25.3.1) demonstrating gaming performance at 4K in the following applications: God of War: Ragnarok (DX12, Ultra), Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered (DX12, Maxed), Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 (DX12, Extreme), Dragon Age: The Veilguard (DX12, Ultra), Resident Evil 4 (DX12, Max RT), DOOM Eternal (Vulkan, Ultra Nightmare RT). System manufacturers may vary configurations, yielding different results.
 
So is this going to be a good, quality card? For 550/600 USD? Or it also means I can get whatever was right before this significantly cheaper? I'm using a 1080 ti right now and I want a significant upgrade, but not a significant cost. :messenger_grinning_sweat: :messenger_loudly_crying:
 
Last edited:

Astray

Member
6800 XT: $650 2022
7800 XT: $500 2023
9070 XT: $600 2025

Still too much for me, but

3070ti: $600 2021
4070ti: $800 2023
5070ti: $750 2025

that's why the clapping.
The correct comparison is the 7700xt (given the 7), so not sure why you're comparing to a past higher-end card than the actual product coding implies.

Watch as they normalize this pricing for their following gen "midrange" cards and then add new "halo products" on top for an eye-watering Nvidia-like premium.

AMD has successfully hoodwinked the pc market this gen.
 

StereoVsn

Gold Member
I really want to see real benches now, OC options and cooler comparisons.

Got a 3080Ti and while I don’t NEED to upgrade, I kind of want to for better performance at 4K, and better RT and frame Gen (fingers crossed).
 

SKYF@ll

Member
Also AMD said that FSR 4 requires 779 TOPS, compared with the 300 TOPS that PSSR uses. And finally in the presentation, AMD seemed to be claiming that the Performance (not Quality) mode delivered similar image quality to native. If true, that would put it closer to DLSS 4 than PSSR.
RX9700XT: INT8 778.5 TOPS(with Sparsity)
RX9700: INT8 582.5 TOPS(with Sparsity)
PS5 Pro: INT 8 300 TOPS(w/o Sparsity?)

FSR4 seems to work with at least 582.5 TOPS.
 

Jinxed

Member
So is this going to be a good, quality card? For 550/600 USD? Or it also means I can get whatever was right before this significantly cheaper? I'm using a 1080 ti right now and I want a significant upgrade, but not a significant cost. :messenger_grinning_sweat: :messenger_loudly_crying:
If you can get one at msrp, this is a great value card. People can bitch about AMD all they want, I got a founder 6800xt directly from AMD in 2021 and it's been serving me well for 4 years and a half. It's still handling great every game I throw at it
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom