• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Releasing games on Xbox Game Pass hurts sales by upwards of 80%, according to Christopher Dring

Taur007

Gold Member
The reason it makes sense for netflix, etc to use this model is because they are able to crank out cheap reality shows at a crazy pace to pad out their release schedules along with older big budget stuff. You can put a movie from 2006 on Netflix and people will watch it. You can’t put a game from 2006 on gamepass as it exists because it would need work to run on modern hardware and people likely won’t play it anyway.

Also the most popular modern games are GaaS. A person who is super into CoD or Fortnite doesn’t care about having access to 100 games of varying quality. They just wanna crank through their battle pass and buy a Goku skin or whatever.

They should’ve pulled the plug on gamepass a while ago but they are weirdly committed to it. I don’t think it was a terrible idea and I probably would’ve loved it as a broke teenager but it’s basically killed their console business at this point.
GP hasn't killed a thing, MS themselves "killed" Xbox with their weak decision making and non existent marketing for GP and their games itself. I'm still running into plenty of people at work that don't even know wtf a "gamepass" is... even though its been around since 2017, that is a huge problem.

They're trash at marketing their ip, I don't see any commercials for any Xbox games the small moments I might watch some tv. Don't they have a surface deal with the NFL? Where are the playoff commercials? Superbowl ads? The last commercial I seen was for Starfield all the way back in 2023 and it sucked, showed absolutely NO gameplay, if I wasn't a gamer I wouldn't even have known wtf to think of it

They're too scared to flex their muscle too busy trying to befriend Sony meanwhile there's no type of reciprocation on Sony's end. If you ask me...everything NOT named call of duty should've been exclusive, same way Sony would have played it. Yes it may hurt sales tremendously up front but I think they would've been fine long term, they could've had a "ps3 esque" recovery all they had to do was keep their heads down and keep releasing great games but it's like they quit before they even got started even though I think this is more Satya than Phil's doing.

I still don't think Xbox is ever really dead though considering every gen starts at zero and they own the biggest ip in the world. All it takes is one exclusive COD at console launch to turn the tide but we know they won't have the heart to do that😂😂if they were smart and really wanted to get around the FTC just have one of the studios (preferably sledgehammer) make a game called "Duty of Call" and make that one exclusive😂
 

IntentionalPun

Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
I still buy MS’s games on PC and don’t subscribe to GPU or PCG.

I’m pretty selective so it’s just not a great value to me as a PC gamer.

If I was an actual Xbox console gamer that might change though since I’d already be paying for online access I guess.
 
GP hasn't killed a thing
it literally killed games sales on Xbox.
E Agora GIF by Musicasa

What are we even doing here?
 

OctopusBox

Neo Member
No one takes journalists seriously. That's not what I'm talking about. And most of those sales are in China where they aren't reading IGN.

Is your position that near unanimous shit talking about this game on youtube, and forums doesn't impact sales negatively at all? GP probably saved Hellblade 2. I'm sure some people were willing to pay for a month of GP to try it but not $50 with all the people talking shit about it.
How many people were going to buy this game in the first place? I don’t see anything about this game before release that enticed me to buy it. It just doesn’t look or sound like a game with mass appeal. Every showing looked boring af.
 

WoJ

Member
People saying "duh" in this thread but roll back a few years and you had those slightly fishy industry insiders suggesting it doesn't canabalise sales

This right here. It wasn't that long ago those of us with any critical thinking skills said game pass was hurting sales and therefore developers. The pushback we got by people parroting "best deal in gaming" was insane.

Now Xbox is just.....sad.
 

Elios83

Member
This is well known to Microsoft as well.
Their goal was to have a big investement phase to create a 80-100m userbase in a few years. After that the whole thing would become sustainable.
The big issue is that they miscalculated the appeal of a subscription service in the gaming market since games cannot be consumed like movies or music.
They're stuck with a 30m userbase no matter how many billions they have invested to add contents on it (including COD) and have lost actual full priced sales. In this way the whole thing will never be sustainable.
They're far too deep in the hole to fully backtrack so the only way going forward will be to constantly raise the price of the tiers with day one big games.
This generation has been a whole strategic debacle for MS.
 
Last edited:

xanaum

Member
So, the future of Game Pass is gonna be just experimental indies?

With movie streaming, it’s kinda similar, but games are way more expensive than most movies nowadays.

Can you imagine how much money Disney would’ve lost if they launched Inside Out 2 or Deadpool vs. Wolverine directly on their service?

Or how much Sony would’ve lost if Spider-Man 2 dropped straight to PS Plus?
 

lh032

I cry about Xbox and hate PlayStation.
Well obviously subscriptions hurt individual sales. I don’t buy movies anymore, I watch them on my streaming services.

The real question is how much money the game made by being on Game Pass versus not. It was my understanding that Microsoft will subsidize game development costs for games slated to be Day Ones on game pass. Do the devs get more money based off of how many people play their game on GP?
If you think about it, these subscription deals are probably trap for most devs

Imagine nobody plays your game on gamepass. And Microsoft offering lower price for the sequel .

Now the dev is stuck with lower deal offering from Microsoft, and if they go for traditional game sales route, nobody would care
 
If you think about it, these subscription deals are probably trap for most devs

Imagine nobody plays your game on gamepass. And Microsoft offering lower price for the sequel .

Now the dev is stuck with lower deal offering from Microsoft, and if they go for traditional game sales route, nobody would care

If your game launched on GamePass and no one played it and yet it was still successful enough for this sequel you’re talking about, then the game either sold very well despite GamePass, or that GamePass check was massive.

Developers are routinely coming back to these sub services. They are either getting satisfied with the monetary return, or we as gamers are failing them and they have no other option. I mean we see it a lot in the GamePass threads themselves, if the game isn’t a blockbuster AAA title then the replies are all “trash month” etc etc.

Most of these games aren’t games people are rushing out to buy in droves. And that’s the best part of the service imho.
 

FunkMiller

Member
Sherlock No Shit GIF by Holmes & Watson


...and, much like the streaming revolution, the more companies chase the subscription model, the more we're headed for a massive and cathartic collapse of the whole shit show. Yay.
 

Det

Member
I'm sure Microsoft expected to go down as well, but they sure as hell didn't expect Game Pass to plateau at 25 million subscribers.

Nadella was about to close Xbox, and he had already closed studios. Phill came up with the idea of "look at how successful Netflix is, let's make a Netflix of video games?"

The idea of whoever created the gamepass was not to work, it was to keep their job for as long as possible.

Phill did it, he will make it to retirement
 

Det

Member
Indiana Jones got name-dropped along with Hellblade 2 here, which means it didn't sell on Xbox either.

And we know it didn't sell on Steam either.

It's not looking good for that one.
My prediction for all of this, all of the Xbox, Activision, Bethesda... The more than 100 billion in subsidies and purchases poured into the Xbox will become nothing.
Little by little everything they bought wears out, an example is Bethesda from Skyrim to Starfield.

There were so many years of fake hype with Phill Spencer saying that "the best of our E3 is what we're going to present next year" that people started to ignore the Xbox.
It's the same as you believing a liar several times, when he tells the truth you simply ignore him.

In the real world, the Xbox is the worst a brand could be: NOTHING
 
Last edited:

laynelane

Member
This is the main reason why Game Pass will never be on Sony and Nintendo systems. I still remember all the talk about how it was inevitable, but it never made financial sense (just like how Game Pass increases sales never made sense).
 
So, the future of Game Pass is gonna be just experimental indies?

With movie streaming, it’s kinda similar, but games are way more expensive than most movies nowadays.

Can you imagine how much money Disney would’ve lost if they launched Inside Out 2 or Deadpool vs. Wolverine directly on their service?

Or how much Sony would’ve lost if Spider-Man 2 dropped straight to PS Plus?

That’s a bold claim. Making a game can be expensive or affordable, as movies. There are indie movies with a laughable budget that have made millions (The Blair Witch Project) while movies with millionaire budget have failed in the box office worldwide.

Also, Disney has already debuted movies on D+ that haven’t been screened at cinemas, plus Netflix and Amazon Prime Video movies and shows have been released only on their streaming platforms, missing cinemas and retail releases.

So, I disagree with that statement, streaming and subscription platforms are here to stay, as they are profitable
 
Last edited:
Yes it reduced sales for xbox games.

Who are getting all the GP revenue.

They must’ve done the math to see if its worth it or not.

I mean, I play all xbox stuff on gamepass. Even if its cheaper to buy it. Gamepass is what I associate xbox with now.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Yes it reduced sales for xbox games.

Who are getting all the GP revenue.

They must’ve done the math to see if its worth it or not.

I mean, I play all xbox stuff on gamepass. Even if its cheaper to buy it. Gamepass is what I associate xbox with now.
If they had done the math, they wouldn't be crying about:

"how the Xbox business is not strong enough", and
"increasing Game Pass price multiple times", and
"removing day one games from the $15 tier", and
"significantly reducing the number of games joining Game Pass", and
"releasing their exclusives games on PlaySTation for money."

They obviously didn't do the math correctly, which is why they are struggling and running around like a headless chicken now.
 
Last edited:
If they had done the math, they wouldn't be crying about:

"how the Xbox business is not strong enough", and
"increasing Game Pass price multiple times", and
"removing day one games from the $15 tier", and
"significantly reducing the number of games joining Game Pass", and
"releasing their exclusives games on PlaySTation for money."

They obviously didn't do the math correctly, which is why they are struggling and running around like a headless chicken now.

Finding faults in a 15 billion revenue company accounting, while not being privy to any info whatsoever.

I2He56z.gif


I'm sure they did, but the math was about undercutting everyone to have 100 million subs by now which didn't really pan out. Seeing all their recent moves, I don't think they ever accounted for the situation they currently find themselves in.

They have increased prices recently. That should adjust it for a lower subscriber count.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
This is not accounting work lol.

They can surely figure out how much they are investing in developing games, and how much they should charge to cover it from gamepass subscribers.

Not sure how is that related to the chart you posted.
Who's talking about "accounting" here? lol

We're talking about the business viability of the model. You said "they would have done their math". That "math" doesn't only mean accounting. It also includes business forecasting. And the chart I posted shows that they missed their forecasted goals.

So obviously whatever numbers they ran turned out to be useless.
 

YeulEmeralda

Linux User
Well obviously subscriptions hurt individual sales. I don’t buy movies anymore, I watch them on my streaming services.

The real question is how much money the game made by being on Game Pass versus not. It was my understanding that Microsoft will subsidize game development costs for games slated to be Day Ones on game pass. Do the devs get more money based off of how many people play their game on GP?
Streaming only works because Netflix makes their own content.
 

MayauMiao

Member
Why would I spend $70-$80 for a game that I could finish in a day or two, while binge other games when I can do it on the cheap with just a month pass?

I don't even need to continue monthly subscription after that and if I like to replay the game I would just purchase rent it someday on Steam when its dirt cheap.
 

Kokoloko85

Member
How did stinky people on forums know better than suits and “experts” that spread lies to there discord and have it trickle down to the masses via shills and idiot fans….
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Starfield too lol.
Yes, but at least Starfield sold somewhat okay on Steam. People bought the game before they realized how crap it is.

With Hellblade 2 and Indiana Jones, folks didn't even buy the game on either platform. They just straight-up bombed. And from what I hear, Indiana Jones is actually a good game. But it suffered nevertheless.
 
Finding faults in a 15 billion revenue company accounting, while not being privy to any info whatsoever.

I2He56z.gif

Especially funny when almost all of that stuff he’s whining about are things that all sub services do. Change the service, increase price, etc. It’s done every single time. Did he really expect GamePass to be any different?

He’s also talking out of his ass about “significantly less games”, but what else is new. Now he’s claiming “apparently Indy is a good game” but before launch he was claiming the short review embargo before launch confirms the game would be a rushed buggy mess 🤭🤭
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom