• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo Switch 2 will have the best upscaling technology of any consoles

Stake out your position

  • I stand with OP

  • OP is talking crazy


Results are only viewable after voting.

Buggy Loop

Gold Member
Boy I do hope that people understand that for DLSS to work decent you need at least good internal resolution with adequate stability and with very few temporal effects.

Even on CNN model it performed way better than FSR.



Transformer model is more stable, less ghosting, faster. That lower latency is exactly the most impact on chipsets with low tensor core count such as a 2050.
 
Last edited:
what does that have to do with better upscaling technology?


again this thread is just full of salty fanboys not even even talking about upscaling tech.
Upscaling doesn't do much if the game itself already looks and performs rubbish, i.e. a polished turd is still a turd.

I fail to see how he's being salty as he's not even making an argument against DLSS, more so he's stating one example of which DLSS's benefit will be extremely limited.
 
The enhanced DLSS upscaler has even less latency than previous CNN model of DLSS. It gets better performances.

Even TURING will benefit from this

No need for new hardware, no new tensor cores. It's the trained model that has changed.
What's changed? So my 3060ti will benefit? if so when and how?
 

K' Dash

Member
Yeah that massive bandwidth and raster performance of a 60W 8nm 2013 era hardware is surely going to have tons of beefy headroom for state of the art upscaling similar to a $2000 GPU

Holding Back Jim Carrey GIF by 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment

is that your face when Grandpa Yamauchi bends you over?
 

FireFly

Member
What’s so hard for you to understand that a 2013 piece of hardware is going to look like dogshit and will not have the headroom to implement DLSS equally as a 2025 $2000 gpu?

You’re the same guy that said 8nm wasn’t confirmed. So much for your “tech knowledge”. Derp
8nm still isn't confirmed for Switch 2. And Ampere isn't from 2013.

(Yes, it remains to be seen how well the new model will scale down to lower end hardware).
 
Last edited:

Buggy Loop

Gold Member
what does that have to do with better upscaling technology?


again this thread is just full of salty fanboys not even even talking about upscaling tech.

Yup

Peoples are like wow, It still won't look as good as Naughty Dog Intergalactic or GTA 6!

hugh laurie facepalm GIF


No shit!

Look at # of crossgen titles though. Having base PS4 baseline with much much much much better upscaling and architecture than 2012 GCN (James is cute to refer to 2013 tech for Switch 2, he's so adorable, he thinks TFlops is a reference of "tech" dating). Ampere cache improvements wipe the floor with AMD's GCN. Let's not even go into Jaguar CPUs lol. Also Switch 2 has modern I/O and SSD, which PS4 had not.

It'll punch way above its weight. Even with baseline PS4 1.84 TFlops.

Horizon Forbidden west from PS5 to PS4 is not even dramatic.

Even asset for asset if its not as good, the UPSCALING is what we're talking about here. You could upscale a Gamecube game for all I care, how is it upscaling and how stable is it.

How can we ever live with better than PS4 baseline, THE HORROR

1_zajqmjM.jpg



It's not even a limitation of hardware anymore for Nintendo, 95% of developers don't even have the skills or budget to push like Sony did on PS4. But having this hardware baseline as being terrible in handheld is comical.
 
Last edited:

RoboFu

One of the green rats
Upscaling doesn't do much if the game itself already looks and performs rubbish, i.e. a polished turd is still a turd.

I fail to see how he's being salty as he's not even making an argument against DLSS, more so he's stating one example of which DLSS's benefit will be extremely limited.

sp ps4 games look and run like rubbish? :messenger_tears_of_joy:

so-salty-salt-bae.gif
 

amigastar

Gold Member
Is there a performance hit with New Transformer Resolution compared to the old CNN Resolution or is it the same? I mean it looks much better.
 

clem84

Gold Member
OMG, holy shit, WTF, I cannot imagine how sharper those few pixels will be when I play either looking at a 7" screen in handheld, or sitting a few meters away from the TV!

this changes everything GIF by The Next Step


I really hate this DF timeline.
There's a lot we don't know yet but I always imagined this is the way Nintendo should go with a system like the Switch. To have modest graphical capabilities in handheld mode, and extra hardware being used in docked mode to produce stable frame rates and higher resolutions. This could take the form of higher clock speeds when in docked mode, which I believe was what the Switch was doing, or extra hardware on the dock for scaling and better performance.

But yeah, obviously in handheld mode this tech is more or less useless.
 

daclynk

Member
The announcement from last night, the move to change from old DLSS Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to transformer model is applicable for all RTX hardware

qvjQZ3s.jpeg


Even Switch 2 with rumoured old ass Ampere will have the best upscaling tech of console world

Serious The Four GIF by Diddy


Next gen, if a console manufacturer goes with AMD, the other should go with Nvidia, the one with the deeper pockets. It's getting ridiculous how good Nvidia is getting at AI.

stop GIF
 
Last edited:

Cyberpunkd

Member
There's a lot we don't know yet but I always imagined this is the way Nintendo should go with a system like the Switch. To have modest graphical capabilities in handheld mode, and extra hardware being used in docked mode to produce stable frame rates and higher resolutions. This could take the form of higher clock speeds when in docked mode, which I believe was what the Switch was doing, or extra hardware on the dock for scaling and better performance.

But yeah, obviously in handheld mode this tech is more or less useless.
This coupled with extra cost for the dock (not included) would be pretty good idea to keep the handheld-only SKU at a lower price. My worry is Nintendo will think this will be super confusing for people, especially if you call it Switch 2. So many will assume the TV functionalities are the same as with OG Switch.
 

FireFly

Member
DF says it’s basically a lock for 8nm based on leaks

And the overall power they estimate at base ps4 levels (2013 hardware)
They think it's likely but not certain that it will use 8nm. But they also thought it was likely but not certain that PS5 Pro was using 6nm. So their informed speculation doesn't count as confirmation of anything. The reason for thinking that Nintendo will use a newer Samsung process is due to the T239 being too large to be reasonably clocked down on 8nm, based on current Orin parts. DF think that Samsung/Nvidia will have redesigned the process/architecture to be more power efficient on 8nm, making it viable. But unless they have actual insider knowledge, that's just speculation.

And yes, the overall power should be at PS4 levels, but that doesn't tell us whether the 48 Tensor cores (which don't exist on the PS4) are capable of running the new DLSS model.
 
Last edited:
This coupled with extra cost for the dock (not included) would be pretty good idea to keep the handheld-only SKU at a lower price. My worry is Nintendo will think this will be super confusing for people, especially if you call it Switch 2. So many will assume the TV functionalities are the same as with OG Switch.

It'd be funny after all this speculation of added stuff to the dock to boost performance with DLSS etc, if the Switch 2 just ends up using the OG Switch dock
 

Cyberpunkd

Member
It'd be funny after all this speculation of added stuff to the dock to boost performance with DLSS etc, if the Switch 2 just ends up using the OG Switch dock
I think they already confirmed the power socket is different. Nintendo would never pass the chance to sell you more plastic, if it comes down to it there will be no performance boost but they will sell the dock separately.
 

Robb

Gold Member
Knowing Nintendo, they will stick with FSR1 just to spite everyone
The sound of millions of Nintendo fans knees hitting the ground in disappointment simultaneously will sweep around the globe if that turns out to be the case.
tHl8Gs.gif
 
Last edited:

poppabk

Cheeks Spread for Digital Only Future
What’s so hard for you to understand that a 2013 piece of hardware is going to look like dogshit and will not have the headroom to implement DLSS equally as a 2025 $2000 gpu?

You’re the same guy that said 8nm wasn’t confirmed. So much for your “tech knowledge”. Derp
Plenty of frametime available at 30fps.
 

BennyBlanco

aka IMurRIVAL69
OP is of course 100% right, DLSS is the best upscaling tech and continues getting better. Just depends on how it’s implemented.

The problem is Nintendo wants to ship a $400 console and make money on hardware, and Nvidia isn’t giving them any deals because they don’t care. Jensen didn’t even mention them last night and was giving shout outs to EV brands that probably sold less than 100,000 cars.
 

ShaiKhulud1989

Gold Member
Old Jedi Survivor on base PS5 with FSR and RT. Good luck with RT on Switch 2. This was pre-patch resolution he's using. After the patch that removed RT the internal resolution was 1080p then upscaled.
Plus JE has an overall issue with IQ even on PC with Ultra and DLSS quality. Not an example you wanna bring up in good faith.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom