The fuck is this shit? What are you, 12?
I might be. Dont be a pedo
Ok for DLSS 3 but with DLSS 4, the better stability and FGx4 it just wipes out PSSR for now. I'm pretty sure PSSR will be amazing on PS6 because Sony is learning faster than AMD and they were very smart to put PSSR on the Pro for "beta testing" it, to get the best possible version ready for the PS6. I'm really curious to see what they have in stock on the GPU side.
For real, the sooner you accept it the better
Do you consider Steam Deck to be a 2013 piece of hardware?
It's got a fan this time so the dock is definitely different.
Now that nVidia is catching up with stability in movement, huh?
He’s right.
Yeah that massive bandwidth and raster performance of a 60W 8nm 2013 era hardware is surely going to have tons of beefy headroom for state of the art upscaling similar to a $2000 GPU
I grant you that Nintendo is cheap, but they would be stupid if, to save a few cents by asking Nvidia to remove the AI cores, they lost the ability to use the best upscaling and ray tracing technology available today, something Sony would already love to have on their PS5
I mean, we have to be realistic here. PSSR is good for what it is and it can only get better and better. But it's nowhere close to DLSS. FSR is shit and should be totally reworked for a true hardware implementation (which is happening apparently? wait and see I guess). I really hope Sony and Microsoft go with Nvidia because (unfortunately) AMD is struggling a lot. They can't even catch up with the 4000 series that's really sad.
I hope someone, Intel or AMD, can do something about that monopoly Nvidia is having, because it's never a good thing.
Edit: Unless Sony is doing some heavily customized GPU for the PS6, they have very talented engineer so why not go all out with a big fat GPU with custom tech and secret sauce.
Seems you are more interested in hypotheticals and your own reality than anything.Yea i don't expect much from you guys and tech knowledge, really not much, like a tiny little spoon, that's what you don't get. The training MODEL has changed. It runs on ALL RTX tensor cores, all the way back to Turing, and performs better with lower ms of rendering.
Very hard concepts I know
whAt iS mL? Aiii?
175 millions sellsYup
Peoples are like wow, It still won't look as good as Naughty Dog Intergalactic or GTA 6!
No shit!
Look at # of crossgen titles though. Having base PS4 baseline with much much much much better upscaling and architecture than 2012 GCN (James is cute to refer to 2013 tech for Switch 2, he's so adorable, he thinks TFlops is a reference of "tech" dating). Ampere cache improvements wipe the floor with AMD's GCN. Let's not even go into Jaguar CPUs lol. Also Switch 2 has modern I/O and SSD, which PS4 had not.
It'll punch way above its weight. Even with baseline PS4 1.84 TFlops.
Horizon Forbidden west from PS5 to PS4 is not even dramatic.
Even asset for asset if its not as good, the UPSCALING is what we're talking about here. You could upscale a Gamecube game for all I care, how is it upscaling and how stable is it.
How can we ever live with better than PS4 baseline, THE HORROR
It's not even a limitation of hardware anymore for Nintendo, 95% of developers don't even have the skills or budget to push like Sony did on PS4. But having this hardware baseline as being terrible in handheld is comical.
Series X has 48 anemic TOPS (8-bit). PS5PRO has 300. A 5070 has 988. I’m calling the Switch 2 about 100 TOPS max.
If we go by the DF prediction of 10TOPs per 5W you get 120TOPS absolute max docked. Whats more damning for Switch 2 is the fact that the cost of DLSS at 60fps becomes too high a percentage of the frametime to the point that DLSS Ultra Performance would be the only sane choice at 30fps. No matter how great the upscaling tech the overall image quality isn't going to be great at 4K Upscale if this is the case so would look worse than games using other upscalers with higher native res. I have a feeling DLSS4 is even more costly and would take a higher percentage on older cards. If that's the case it would also explain the lack of fps graphs in the slides.
Nvidia is driving the technical wonders, not Nintendo. Seeing what Nvidia presented yesterday, the Switch 2 should be a pretty interesting piece of hardware.
It’s not going to be DLSS4. It’ll be 3 and it’ll be fine because compared with the original Switch this is a true generational gap, those we don’t really have in the high end. But those expecting a handheld chip for Nintendo to have AI on par with what was demoed in 500wats cards are in for a surprise.
It was just a little fun gif nothing more. I'm not young either btw and I totally get your point. Unfortunately, the future is AI related rather we like it or not. Thankfully we still have lots of game that don't need all this shit. I recently bought Brotato and it's awesome, one of the best game I played in 2024 and it looks like crap (I like the artstyle but other than that it's nothing special).
Good point for the retro compatibility! But at some point they must be able to brute force the emulation no? Maybe PS3 era can be a bit tricky with it's CPU but other than that they should be good.
I don't completely disagree with you (specially agree on the part about Zelda) but come on, you are exaggerating a little bit there.
Same, the games will always be the main attraction. But even so I feel like the hardware definitely decreased my enjoyment of their games towards the end of Switch’s lifespan.
